nep-des New Economics Papers
on Economic Design
Issue of 2023‒10‒16
three papers chosen by
Guillaume Haeringer, Baruch College and


  1. Monetary policy rules: model uncertainty meets design limits By Dück, Alexander; Verona, Fabio
  2. Designing the report card content for healthcare payment reduction By Takahara, Tsuyoshi; Kanda, Yutaka
  3. How Automated Market Makers Approach the Thin Market Problem in Cryptoeocnomic Systems By Daniel Kirste; Niclas Kannengie{\ss}er; Ricky Lamberty; Ali Sunyaev

  1. By: Dück, Alexander; Verona, Fabio
    Abstract: Optimal monetary policy studies typically rely on a single structural model and identification of model-specific rules that minimize the unconditional volatilities of inflation and real activity. In our proposed approach, we take a large set of structural models and look for the model-robust rules that minimize the volatilities at those frequencies that policymakers are most interested in stabilizing. Compared to the status quo approach, our results suggest that policymakers should be more restrained in their inflation responses when their aim is to stabilize inflation and output growth at specific frequencies. Additional caution is called for due to model uncertainty.
    Keywords: monetary policy rules, policy evaluation, model comparison, model uncertainty, frequency domain, design limits, DSGE models
    JEL: C49 E32 E37 E52 E58
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:bofrdp:122023&r=des
  2. By: Takahara, Tsuyoshi; Kanda, Yutaka
    Abstract: This study analyzes the effect of the content of report cards on the optimal incentivized payment for physicians. Our analysis assumes that report card disclosure builds a reputation regarding physicians' ability among patients who do not have the expertise to know better. Furthermore, we assume that the insurer designs a payment scheme that designates high-ability physicians to provide advanced treatment and low-ability physicians to provide a conventional treatment. We compare the benchmark (no disclosure) with two disclosure policies: detailed, where patients can recognize what service was provided and the outcome of the advanced treatment for all physicians, and limited, where patients can distinguish only physicians who provided the advanced treatment successfully. Our analysis shows that detailed disclosure requires a higher expected payment than the benchmark, and the insurer can save it by limiting the informativeness of the report. Intuitively, detailed disclosure conveys physician type more precisely, and the insurer must pay an additional wage for the conventional treatment provided by low-ability physicians. Our result implies that incentivization by non-monetary method (report card) and monetary method (pay-for-performance) may work in both complement and substitute.
    Keywords: Principal-agent model, Reputation concern, Asymmetric information
    JEL: D23 D86 I18
    Date: 2023–09–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:118529&r=des
  3. By: Daniel Kirste; Niclas Kannengie{\ss}er; Ricky Lamberty; Ali Sunyaev
    Abstract: The proper design of automated market makers (AMMs) is crucial to enable the continuous trading of assets represented as digital tokens on markets of cryptoeconomic systems. Improperly designed AMMs can make such markets suffer from the thin market problem (TMP), which can cause cryptoeconomic systems to fail their purposes. We developed an AMM taxonomy that showcases AMM design characteristics. Based on the AMM taxonomy, we devised AMM archetypes implementing principal solution approaches for the TMP. The main purpose of this article is to support practitioners and researchers in tackling the TMP through proper AMM designs.
    Date: 2023–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2309.12818&r=des

This nep-des issue is ©2023 by Guillaume Haeringer and . It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.