nep-dem New Economics Papers
on Demographic Economics
Issue of 2026–10–26
four papers chosen by
Héctor Pifarré i Arolas, University of Wisconsin


  1. Female Jobs and Fertility: Long-term Experimental Evidence from Ethiopian Factories By Kotsadam, Andreas; Pieters, Janneke; Rossi, Pauline; Villanger, Espen; Zipfel, Céline; Getahun, Tigabu
  2. The Impact of the Great Recession on Mortality: A Dynamic Factor Analysis By Amy Finkelstein; Matthew J. Notowidigdo; Enzo Profili
  3. Age at menarche and timing of first birth: the moderating role of female education in the Global South By D. Susie Lee; Andreas Backhaus; Ewa Batyra; Zafer Büyükkeçeci; Martin Flatø; Kelsey Q. Wright
  4. Do Pension Reforms Affect Migrants Differently? Evidence from Germany and Spain By Emre Kurt; Hao Wei

  1. By: Kotsadam, Andreas (Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research); Pieters, Janneke (Wageningen University); Rossi, Pauline (CREST-École Polytechnique); Villanger, Espen (Chr. Michelsen Institute); Zipfel, Céline (House of Sustainable Society (HoSS)); Getahun, Tigabu (EconInsight Center for Development Research)
    Abstract: We conducted an experiment with multiple factories in Ethiopia to test the widespread hypothesis that formal employment among women reduces fertility. Tracking respondents over eight years, we find that women who were randomly offered a job had more children than the control group. The effect on fertility emerged once the effect on wage employment faded away, around three years after baseline. There are clear effects on household income and savings, but not on bargaining power or marriage. These patterns are consistent with a Beckerian model in which the income effect dominates the substitution effect and households are credit constrained.
    Keywords: Female employment; fertility; industrialization; sub-Saharan Africa
    JEL: J13 J16 J22 O15 O55
    Date: 2026–10–08
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:hamisu:2026_006
  2. By: Amy Finkelstein; Matthew J. Notowidigdo; Enzo Profili
    Abstract: We use a dynamic factor time series model to estimate the national mortality impact of the Great Recession. In aggregate, the Great Recession reduced the average annual, age-adjusted mortality rate by about 2 percent, with effects persisting for at least a decade. In a calibrated model of the welfare effects of the estimated impacts of the Great Recession on consumption and mortality, we find that the welfare gain from the estimated mortality decline is quantitatively significant relative to the welfare loss from the estimated consumption decline. The estimated mortality decline is also quantitatively close to prior mortality estimates using cross-sectional variation in the severity of the Great Recession, implying limited general equilibrium effects of the Great Recession on mortality. More broadly, our findings suggest that prior evidence from local labor markets that recessions are good for health can be extrapolated to the likely mortality consequences of nationwide recessions.
    JEL: C32 E3 I1
    Date: 2026–10
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35914
  3. By: D. Susie Lee (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany); Andreas Backhaus; Ewa Batyra (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany); Zafer Büyükkeçeci (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany); Martin Flatø; Kelsey Q. Wright (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany)
    JEL: J1 Z0
    Date: 2026
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dem:wpaper:wp-2026-042
  4. By: Emre Kurt (University of Insubria); Hao Wei (Friedrich Schiller University Jena)
    Abstract: This paper examines whether migrants and native-born workers respond differently to pension reforms that encourage longer working lives. Using longitudinal data from SHARE Waves 4–9 for Germany and Spain, we construct individual reform exposure based on country-specific reform timing, birth-cohort eligibility, and proximity to retirement age, and estimate models with individual and survey-wave fixed effects. Reform exposure is associated with a lower probability of retirement, with suggestive evidence of an additional decline among migrants. This migrant differential is particularly pronounced in Spain, while the corresponding estimate is small and statistically insignificant in Germany, although formal cross-country tests do not establish a statistically significant difference between the two countries. Complementary analyses indicate that adjustment is concentrated around retirement ages rather than reflecting a broad increase in employment, while evidence for effects on mental health and generalized trust is limited. Overall, the findings suggest that migrants may respond differently to pension reform, but that these differences are concentrated at specific retirement margins and depend on the institutional context
    Keywords: Migration, Retirement, Mental Health, Generalized Trust, SHARE
    JEL: J14 J15 J26 H55
    Date: 2026–10–13
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2026-013

This nep-dem issue is ©2026 by Héctor Pifarré i Arolas. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the Griffith Business School of Griffith University in Australia.