nep-dem New Economics Papers
on Demographic Economics
Issue of 2024‒09‒02
two papers chosen by
Héctor Pifarré i Arolas, University of Wisconsin


  1. Early Life Health Conditions and Racial Gaps in Education By Briana Ballis
  2. A welfare analysis of universal childcare: Lessons from a Canadian reform By Montpetit, Sébastien; Beaureard, Pierre-Loup; Carrer, Luisa

  1. By: Briana Ballis (University of California, Merced)
    Abstract: Racial disparities in infant health conditions have persisted for decades. However, there is surprisingly limited evidence regarding the long-term consequences of these disparities. Using novel linked administrative data from Texas and the shift to Medicaid Managed Care (MMC), I show that MMC-driven declines in infant health worsened cognitive and noncognitive outcomes for Black children, while MMC-driven enhancements in infant health improved noncognitive outcomes and educational attainment for Hispanics. Effects concentrate in low-value added districts for either demographic, suggesting that the long run impacts of changes to early life health conditions are more pronounced in less effective schools for one’s demographic.
    Keywords: racial disparities, infant health, Medicaid, Medicaid Managed Care, MMC, early life health
    JEL: I14 I21 I24 I32 I38 J13 J15 J24
    Date: 2024–08
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hka:wpaper:2024-016
  2. By: Montpetit, Sébastien; Beaureard, Pierre-Loup; Carrer, Luisa
    Abstract: Leveraging the introduction of universal low-fee daycare in Québec in 1997, we assess the welfare effect of universal childcare provision. First, using novel data on local daycare coverage and a difference-in-differences design, we show that positive impacts on maternal labor supply and childcare use are greater in areas with larger daycare expansion, suggesting that childcare availability, not just affordability, drives these responses. We then estimate the policy's Marginal Value of Public Funds (MVPF), defined as the ratio of beneficiaries' utility gains to net governmental costs. Unlike the standard sufficient-statistics metric, which assumes a marginal change in fiscal policy, we quantify the beneficiaries' utility gains through a model of maternal labor supply and childcare choices. This allows us to relax the common marginal-policy assumption and to incorporate non-pecuniary benefits for parents. Our results indicate substantial welfare gains from universal policies, with approximately $3.5 of benefits per dollar of net government spending - over twice the amount captured by the sufficient-statistics metric. Counterfactual simulations suggest that allocating more resources to increasing availability, rather than improving affordability, could yield even larger social returns.
    Keywords: universal childcare, daycare coverage, social welfare, sufficient statistics
    JEL: H43 J13 J22
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:clefwp:300866

This nep-dem issue is ©2024 by Héctor Pifarré i Arolas. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.