nep-dem New Economics Papers
on Demographic Economics
Issue of 2022‒01‒24
five papers chosen by
Héctor Pifarré i Arolas
Universitat Pompeu Fabra

  1. Health and Labor Market Impacts of Twin Birth : Evidence from a Swedish IVF Policy Mandate By Bhalotra, Sonia; Clarke, Damian; Mühlrad, Hanna; Palme, Mårten
  2. Marriage before children?. First family formation among the children of immigrants in Norway By Jennifer A. Holland; Kenneth Aa. Wiik
  3. Motherhood and flexible jobs By Inés Berniell; Lucila Berniell; Dolores de la Mata; María Edo; Mariana Marchionni
  4. Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections By Gordon B. Dahl; Runjing Lu; William Mullins
  5. The Effect of Labor Market Shocks across the Life Cycle By Kjell G. Salvanes; Barton Willage; Alexander L.P. Willén

  1. By: Bhalotra, Sonia (Department of Economics, University of Warwick, CEPR, IEA, IZA, CAGE); Clarke, Damian (Department of Economics, University of Chile and IZA); Mühlrad, Hanna (Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU)); Palme, Mårten (Department of Economics, Stockholm University)
    Abstract: IVF allows women to delay birth and pursue careers, but IVF massively increases the risk of twin birth. There is limited evidence of how having twins influences women’s post-birth careers. We investigate this, leveraging a single embryo transfer (SET) mandate implemented in Sweden in 2003, following which the share of twin births showed a precipitous drop of 70%. Linking birth registers to hospitalization and earnings registers, we identify substantial improvements in maternal and child health and women’s earnings following IVF birth, alongside an increase in subsequent fertility. We provide the first comprehensive evaluation of SET, relevant given the secular rise in IVF births and growing concerns over twin birth risk. We contribute new estimates of the child penalty imposed by twin as opposed to singleton birth, relevant to the secular rise in the global twin birth rate.
    Keywords: twins ; IVF ; single embryo transfer ; career costs of children ; child penalty ; gender wage gap ; fertility ; maternal health ; neonatal health ; gender JEL Classification: J13 ; I11 ; I12 ; I38 ; J24
    Date: 2021
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wrk:warwec:1391&r=
  2. By: Jennifer A. Holland; Kenneth Aa. Wiik (Statistics Norway)
    Abstract: Differences in the timing and pathway into family life provide insights into the social distance between majority and immigrant-background groups. Increasing similarity in these processes across immigrant generations may indicate blurring of group distinctions. We situate our study in Norway, a country on the forefront of family change with an increasingly diverse population. Using administrative register data and discrete-time event history models, we demonstrate differential timings and propensities to form families via marriage or a nonmarital first birth among the majority population and the children of immigrants from ten countries of (parental) origin in Europe, the Middle East, East Africa, South Asia, South-East Asia and Latin America. Results demonstrated a generational shift toward the Nordic late marriage pattern among women and men originating from Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Iraq, Iran and Vietnam and men with origins in Turkey. We find limited evidence of generational shifts in the propensity to form a family via a nonmarital first birth, however, in some context, those who form families via this pathway also follow the majority timing pattern, regardless of background or generation. Findings suggest that jointly investigating the timing of family formation and distinct pathways into family life provides new insights into the gradations in and the context of adaptation and diminishing social distance between groups in diverse societies.
    Keywords: Children of immigrants; Second generation; Family formation; Marriage; Parenthood; Norway
    JEL: J10 J12 J15 Y8
    Date: 2021–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ssb:dispap:973&r=
  3. By: Inés Berniell (CEDLAS/UNLP); Lucila Berniell (CAF); Dolores de la Mata (CAF); María Edo (Universidad de San Andrés); Mariana Marchionni (CEDLAS/CONICET)
    Abstract: We study the causal effect of motherhood on labour market outcomes in Latin America. We adopt an event study approach around the birth of the first child based on panel data from national household surveys for Chile, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay. Our main contributions are: (i)providing new and comparable evidence on the effects of motherhood on labour outcomes in developing countries; (ii) exploring the possible mechanisms driving these outcomes; (iii) discussing the potential links between these outcomes and the prevailing gender norms and family policies in the region. We find that motherhood reduces women’s labour supply in the extensive and intensive margins and influences female occupational structure towards flexible occupations— part-time work, self-employment, and informal jobs—needed for family–work balance. Furthermore, countries with more conservative gender norms and less generous family policies are associated with larger differences between mothers’ and non-mothers’ labour market outcomes.
    Keywords: child penalty, event study, female labour supply, self-employment, labour informality, developing countries, Latin America
    JEL: J13 J16 J22 J46
    Date: 2021–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:aoz:wpaper:93&r=
  4. By: Gordon B. Dahl; Runjing Lu; William Mullins
    Abstract: Changes in political leadership drive sharp changes in public policy and partisan beliefs about the future. We exploit the surprise 2016 election of Trump to identify the effects of a shift in political power on one of the most consequential household decisions: whether to have a child. Republican-leaning counties experience a sharp and persistent increase in fertility relative to Democratic counties, a shift amounting to 1.2 to 2.2% of the national fertility rate. In addition, Hispanics see fertility fall relative to non-Hispanics, especially compared to rural or evangelical whites.
    Keywords: fertility, partisanship, elections
    JEL: J13 D72
    Date: 2021
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9488&r=
  5. By: Kjell G. Salvanes; Barton Willage; Alexander L.P. Willén
    Abstract: Adverse economic shocks occur frequently and may cause individuals to reevaluate key life decisions in ways that have lasting consequences for themselves and the economy. These life decisions are fundamentally tied to specific periods of an individual’s career, and economic shocks may therefore have substantially different impacts on individuals – and the broader economy - depending on when they occur. We exploit mass layoffs and establishment closures to examine the impact of adverse shocks across the life cycle on labor market outcomes and major life decisions: human capital investment, mobility, family structure, and retirement. Our results reveal substantial heterogeneity on labor market effects and life decisions in response to economic shocks across the life cycle. Individuals at the beginning of their careers invest in human capital and relocate to new labor markets, individuals in the middle of their careers reduce fertility and adjust family formation decisions, and individuals at the end of their careers permanently exit the workforce and retire. As a consequence of the differential interactions between economic shocks and life decisions, the very long-term career implications of labor shocks vary considerably depending on when the shock occurs. We conclude that effects of adverse labor shocks are both more varied and more extensive than has previously been recognized, and that focusing on average effects among workers across the life cycle misses a great deal.
    Keywords: labor supply, human capital, education, fertility, family formation, mobility, retirement, disability, economic shocks, job displacement
    JEL: I20 J63
    Date: 2021
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9491&r=

This nep-dem issue is ©2022 by Héctor Pifarré i Arolas. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.