nep-dem New Economics Papers
on Demographic Economics
Issue of 2021‒10‒18
four papers chosen by
Héctor Pifarré i Arolas
Universitat Pompeu Fabra

  1. Gene-Environment Effects on Female Fertility By Nicola Barban; Elisabetta De Cao; Marco Francesconi
  2. Migration as a Vector of Economic Losses from Disaster-Affected Areas in the United States By Catalina Anampa Castro; Katherine Curtis; Jack DeWaard; Elizabeth Fussell; Kathryn McConnell; Kobie Price; Michael Soto; Stephan Whitaker
  3. Does education matter? Tests from extensions of compulsory schooling in England and Wales 1919-21, 1947 and 1972 By Clark, Gregory; Cummins, Neil
  4. Life-cycle living standards of intact and disrupted English working families, 1260-1850 By Horrell, Sara; Humphries, Jane; Weisdorf, Jacob

  1. By: Nicola Barban; Elisabetta De Cao; Marco Francesconi
    Abstract: Fertility has a strong biological component generally ignored by economists. Using the UK Biobank, we analyze the extent to which genes, proxied by polygenic scores, and the environment, proxied by early exposure to the contraceptive pill diffusion, affect age at first sexual intercourse, age at first birth, completed family size, and childlessness. Both genes and environment exert substantial influences on all outcomes. The anticipation of sexual debut and the postponement of motherhood led by the diffusion of the pill are magnified by gene-environment interactions, while the decline in family size and the rise in childlessness associated with female emancipation are attenuated by gene-environment effects. The nature-nurture interplay becomes stronger in more egalitarian environments that empower women, allowing genes to express themselves more fully. These conclusions are confirmed by heterogenous effects across the distributions of genetic susceptibilities and exposure to environmental risks, sister fixed effects models, mother-daughter comparisons, and counterfactual simulations.
    Keywords: fertility, genetics, polygenic score, contraceptive pill, nature versus nurture, social norms
    JEL: D10 I14 I15 J01 J13 J16
    Date: 2021
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_9337&r=
  2. By: Catalina Anampa Castro; Katherine Curtis; Jack DeWaard; Elizabeth Fussell; Kathryn McConnell; Kobie Price; Michael Soto; Stephan Whitaker
    Abstract: In this paper, we infuse consideration of migration into research on economic losses from extreme weather disasters. Taking a comparative case study approach and using data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York/Equifax Consumer Credit Panel, we document the size of economic losses via migration from 23 disaster-affected areas in the United States after the most damaging hurricanes, tornadoes, and wildfires on record. We then employ demographic standardization and decomposition to determine if these losses primarily reflect changes in out-migration or changes in the economic resources that migrants take with them (greater economic losses per migrant). Finally, we consider the implications of these losses for changing spatial inequality in the United States. While disaster-affected areas and those living in them differ in their experiences of and responses to extreme weather disasters, we generally find that, relative to the year before an extreme weather disaster, economic losses via migration from disaster-affected areas increase the year of and after the disaster, that these changes primarily reflect changes in out-migration (vs. the economic resources that migrants take with them), and that these losses briefly disrupt the status quo by temporarily reducing spatial inequality.
    Keywords: Natural Disaster; Migration; Consumer Credit; Decomposition; Spatial Inequality
    JEL: R23 Q54 D12 J60
    Date: 2021–10–13
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fip:fedcwq:93161&r=
  3. By: Clark, Gregory; Cummins, Neil
    Abstract: Schooling and social outcomes correlate strongly. But are these connections causal? Previous papers for England using compulsory schooling to identify causal effects have produced conflicting results. Some found significant effects of schooling on adult longevity and on earnings, others found no effects. Here we measure the consequence of extending compulsory schooling in England to ages 14, 15 and 16 in the years 1919-22, 1947 and 1972. From administrative data these increases in compulsory schooling added 0.43, 0.60 and 0.43 years of education to the affected cohorts. We estimate the effects of these increases in schooling for each cohort on measures of adult longevity, on dwelling values in 1999 (an index of lifetime incomes), and on the the social characteristics of the places where the affected cohorts died. Since we have access to all the vital registration records, and a nearly complete sample of the 1999 electoral register, we find with high precision that all the schooling extensions failed to increase adult longevity (as had been found previously for the 1947 and 1972 extensions), dwelling values, or the social status of the communities people die in. Compulsory schooling ages 14-16 had no effect, at the cohort level, on social outcomes in England.
    JEL: N0
    Date: 2020–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:wpaper:107910&r=
  4. By: Horrell, Sara; Humphries, Jane; Weisdorf, Jacob
    Abstract: We provide a framework for considering the living standards among intact and disrupted working-class families of various sizes in historical England. We estimate family incomes without resort to the usual male day wages and ahistorical assumptions about men’s labour inputs, instead using approximations of their annual earnings. We incorporate women and children’s wages and labour inputs and use a family life-cycle approach which accommodates consumption smoothing through saving. The analysis extends to families with often overlooked but historically common structures: widows with their children, deserted wives, and families which include husbands/fathers but ones unable or unwilling to work. Our framework suggests living standards varied considerably over time and by family structure and dependency ratio. Small and intact families enjoyed high and rising living standards after 1700. Large, broken, and disrupted families depended on child labour and poor relief up until 1830.
    Keywords: child labour; consumption soothing; costs-of-living; dependency ratio; life cycle; living standards; poor relief; prices; wages
    JEL: J22 N13 O10
    Date: 2020–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:wpaper:106986&r=

This nep-dem issue is ©2021 by Héctor Pifarré i Arolas. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.