nep-dcm New Economics Papers
on Discrete Choice Models
Issue of 2022‒08‒15
fifteen papers chosen by
Edoardo Marcucci
Università degli studi Roma Tre

  1. Willingness to pay for bundled agricultural insurance products – results from a discrete choice experiment in Bihar, India By Mitra, Archisman; Bouwer, Roy; Balasubramanya, Soumya; Taron, Avinandan
  2. Does Date Label Matter for Aquacultural Food Product Waste? Evidence from a Best-Worst Discrete Choice Experiment By Nian, Yefan; Cruz, Julio C.; Asselt, Joanna Van; Gao, Zhifeng; Morgan, Stephen N.
  3. Consumer willingness to pay for products derived from diversified forests: the case of tree syrups By Khan, Muhammad Jawad; Atallah, Shadi S.; Kalaitzandonakes, Maria H.; Ellison, Brenna
  4. Consumers Preferences for Eco-Labels and the Impact of Information: A Choice Experiment on Aquatic Food Products in China By Shi, Longzhong; Chen, Xuan; Qiu, Jingran; Li, Li
  5. Are German farmers ready for ‘warm restructuring’ of the pig sector? By Thiermann, Insa; Schroeer, Daniel; Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe
  6. Willingness to pay for improvements in recreational fish and seagrass abundance in Florida’s Nature Coast By Hilsenroth, Jana; Grogan, Kelly A.; Savchenko, Olesya; Botta, Robert; Koeneke, Roberto F.; Court, Christa D.
  7. Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias in Estimating Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Best Management Practice Labels By Uddin, Md Azhar; Gao, Zhifeng; Farnsworth, Derek; Borisova, Tatiana; Bolques, Alejandro
  8. The Impacts of Covid-19 on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Information Transparency at Casual and Fine Dining Restaurants By Nguyen, Ly; Gao, Zhifeng; Anderson, James L.; House, Lisa A.
  9. Implications of halo effects in the U.S. alcohol market: An open-ended choice experiment with beer and hard seltzer By Staples, Aaron J.; Caputo, Vincenzina; Ellison, Brenna; Malone, Trey
  10. Valuation of Ecosystem Services Associated with Soil Health Improvement in Nebraska: A Choice Experiment on the Role of Information Nudging By Mavroutsikos, Charalampos; Schoengold, Karina; Banerjee, Simanti; Yiannaka, Amalia; Giannakas, Konstantinos; Awada, Tala
  11. Working in the shadow: Survey techniques for measuring and explaining undeclared work By Burgstaller, Lilith; Feld, Lars P.; Pfeil, Katharina
  12. Tracing the Trends in Consumer Preferences for Eco-labeled Food: A Text Mining and Topic Modeling Approach By Duan, Dinglin; Gao, Zhifeng; Uddin, Md Azhar; Nian, Yefan; Nguyen, Ly
  13. Learning own preferences through consumption By Marek Kapera
  14. The Eurovision Song Contest: Voting Rules, Biases and Rationality By Victor Ginsburgh; Juan D. Moreno-Ternero
  15. Unbiased estimation of the OLS covariance matrix when the errors are clustered By Tom Boot; Gianmaria Niccodemi; Tom Wansbeek

  1. By: Mitra, Archisman; Bouwer, Roy; Balasubramanya, Soumya; Taron, Avinandan
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Environmental Economics and Policy, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322159&r=
  2. By: Nian, Yefan; Cruz, Julio C.; Asselt, Joanna Van; Gao, Zhifeng; Morgan, Stephen N.
    Keywords: Marketing, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Consumer/Household Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322495&r=
  3. By: Khan, Muhammad Jawad; Atallah, Shadi S.; Kalaitzandonakes, Maria H.; Ellison, Brenna
    Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Environmental Economics and Policy, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322464&r=
  4. By: Shi, Longzhong; Chen, Xuan; Qiu, Jingran; Li, Li
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Marketing, Institutional and Behavioral Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322209&r=
  5. By: Thiermann, Insa; Schroeer, Daniel; Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe
    Abstract: Recent statutory changes have increased the pressure on the German livestock sector to adapt. This paper aimed to ascertain whether German pig farmers would be willing to join a pig farming exit scheme similar to the Dutch ‘warm restructuring’ programme. The analysis was based on a discrete choice experiment with 346 pig farmers. The results indicated great interest of the respondents in a government-run decommissioning scheme. Differences in the perception of scheme attributes (compensation offered, demolition requirements, restrictions on future barn construction and slurry intake) and uncertainty among participants were highlighted by the results of a scale-adjusted latent-class estimation.
    Keywords: Livestock Production/Industries, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aesc22:321201&r=
  6. By: Hilsenroth, Jana; Grogan, Kelly A.; Savchenko, Olesya; Botta, Robert; Koeneke, Roberto F.; Court, Christa D.
    Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy, Resource/Energy Economics and Policy, Teaching, Communication, and Extension
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322282&r=
  7. By: Uddin, Md Azhar; Gao, Zhifeng; Farnsworth, Derek; Borisova, Tatiana; Bolques, Alejandro
    Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Environmental Economics and Policy, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322431&r=
  8. By: Nguyen, Ly; Gao, Zhifeng; Anderson, James L.; House, Lisa A.
    Keywords: Institutional and Behavioral Economics, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322463&r=
  9. By: Staples, Aaron J.; Caputo, Vincenzina; Ellison, Brenna; Malone, Trey
    Keywords: Health Economics and Policy, Institutional and Behavioral Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322507&r=
  10. By: Mavroutsikos, Charalampos; Schoengold, Karina; Banerjee, Simanti; Yiannaka, Amalia; Giannakas, Konstantinos; Awada, Tala
    Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Resource/Energy Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322559&r=
  11. By: Burgstaller, Lilith; Feld, Lars P.; Pfeil, Katharina
    Abstract: Little is known about the size and determinants of undeclared work. While approaches to measure the shadow economy have been extensively discussed, conventional surveys dominate research on undeclared work. We review and extend this literature by first referring to the most recent survey data on undeclared work in Germany and, second, by discussing four experimental survey techniques as well as their few applications to questions of undeclared work. We argue that the randomized response technique and list experiments would validate and improve prevalence estimates of undeclared work, whereas careful design of information provision experiments and discrete choice experiments would fill the gap on determinants that causally affect decisions to supply and demand undeclared work.
    Keywords: Undeclared Work,Experimental Survey,Survey Data
    JEL: H26 E26 O17 D91
    Date: 2022
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:aluord:2207&r=
  12. By: Duan, Dinglin; Gao, Zhifeng; Uddin, Md Azhar; Nian, Yefan; Nguyen, Ly
    Keywords: Marketing, Agribusiness, Resource/Energy Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322419&r=
  13. By: Marek Kapera
    Abstract: This paper provides theoretical foundations for preference discovery theory. We propose to relax the assumption that the consumer has perfect knowledge of their own preferences, so that the consumer knows only the subjective probability of those alternatives being in any given relation, which is conditional on the information available to the consumer. To achieve that, we construct probabilistic measures on the space of all permissible preference relations and consider the consumer to be equipped with one such measure, instead of a preference relation. These measures are intrinsically linked by construction to the information structure available to the consumer and allow for indirect learning. We visualize how these measures correspond to the choices of the consumer, we consider three distinct decision procedures. These procedures formalize how under different assumptions regarding the underlying probability measure, the consumer guesses their own tastes. Finally, we use these measures to define the value of the information provided by the consumption of a chosen alternative and study the properties of the preference ranking induced by it.
    Keywords: Taste uncertainty, Preference discovery, Learning through consumption, Conditional preferences, Experimental preferences
    JEL: D11 D83 D91
    Date: 2022–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sgh:kaewps:2022074&r=
  14. By: Victor Ginsburgh (ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium and CORE, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium); Juan D. Moreno-Ternero (Department of Economics, Universidad Pablo de Olavide;)
    Abstract: We analyze and evaluate the rules and results at the 2021 Eurovision Song Contest. We first concentrate on the various voting procedures, and explore several alternatives (inspired by classical contributions in social choice and game theory) that could make a difference for the results. We also discuss other important issues, such as simplicity, contrast effects and whether experts are better judges than tele-voters. Our findings raise the question of whether the voting procedures used by the Eurovision Song Contest authorities are fail-safe. We endorse instead the use of the so-called Shapley voting procedure for judges as well as tele-voters.
    Keywords: Eurovision Song Contest, Voting, Borda, Shapley Method, Biases
    JEL: I10 I14
    Date: 2022
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pab:wpaper:22.09&r=
  15. By: Tom Boot; Gianmaria Niccodemi; Tom Wansbeek
    Abstract: When data are clustered, common practice has become to do OLS and use an estimator of the covariance matrix of the OLS estimator that comes close to unbiasedness. In this paper we derive an estimator that is unbiased when the random-effects model holds. We do the same for two more general structures. We study the usefulness of these estimators against others by simulation, the size of the $t$-test being the criterion. Our findings suggest that the choice of estimator hardly matters when the regressor has the same distribution over the clusters. But when the regressor is a cluster-specific treatment variable, the choice does matter and the unbiased estimator we propose for the random-effects model shows excellent performance, even when the clusters are highly unbalanced.
    Date: 2022–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2206.09644&r=

This nep-dcm issue is ©2022 by Edoardo Marcucci. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.