nep-dcm New Economics Papers
on Discrete Choice Models
Issue of 2010‒11‒27
one paper chosen by
Philip Yu
Hong Kong University

  1. Is stated preference certainty individual-specific? - An empirical study By Swärdh, Jan-Erik

  1. By: Swärdh, Jan-Erik (VTI)
    Abstract: The somewhat ad-hoc method of certainty calibration, based on self-stated preference certainty follow-up questions, has been found to be a successful method of eliminating or reducing hypothetical bias in stated preference studies. But is the preference certainty really context dependent, or do some subjects tend to always state themselves as certain regardless of the context, i.e. is the preference certainty dependent on a systematic unobservable individual-specific effect? This question is empirically analyzed in this paper using data where a preference certainty question follows a hypothetical willingness to pay question, in two different contexts. Estimated bivariate probit models provide no evidence for systematic individual-specific answers to the preference certainty follow-up questions of different contexts. Since there is no support for a randomly self-stated preference certainty either, this result is deemed to increase the credibility of certainty calibration.
    Keywords: Certainty calibration; Preference certainty; Follow-up question; Hypothetical bias; Stated preferences; Bivariate ordered probit
    JEL: C20 C90 D80
    Date: 2010–11–17

This nep-dcm issue is ©2010 by Philip Yu. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.