| By: | Amat Adarov (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Vasily Astrov (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Serkan Çiçek (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Rumen Dobrinsky (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Vladimir Gligorov (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Doris Hanzl-Weiss (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Peter Havlik (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Mario Holzner (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Gabor Hunya (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Sebastian Leitner (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Isilda Mara (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Olga Pindyuk (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Leon Podkaminer (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Sandor Richter (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw); 
Hermine Vidovic (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw) | 
| Abstract: | Growth in the CESEE region will follow the unimpressive pattern displayed by 
the euro area. The longer-term convergence of income levels in the CESEE 
countries can no longer be expected to be as rapid as was assumed a decade or 
so ago. Growth in the period 2015-2017 is not going to deviate substantially 
from the pace recorded in 2014. For the new EU Member States growth is 
expected to remain slightly below 3% in the years to come. This implies an 
average growth differential of about 1.5 percentage points as compared to the 
euro area – about half of what it was before the global financial crisis. On 
the other hand, most of the countries in the region are also expected to evade 
the dangers of runaway inflation, fiscal deficits or excessive foreign 
borrowing that often plagued them in the past. These are the main results of 
the newly released medium-term growth forecast for the region by the Vienna 
Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw). Depressed aggregate 
domestic demand has been the major factor behind anaemic growth. This is 
evidenced by disinflation (or even mildly deflationary tendencies) across much 
of the region, as well as the persistence of fairly high unemployment. There 
is some evidence of a ‘race to the bottom’ in terms of wage setting. While 
wage moderation strengthens profitability and external competitiveness, it 
also weakens disposable household incomes and thus slows down growth in 
domestic demand. Apparently, there is a trade-off between improvements in the 
trade balance and more rapid growth in domestic demand. Overall, GDP growth is 
being held ‘on a short leash’. Growth in public investment may be supporting 
economic growth, especially in those new EU Member States (NMS) that have 
access to EU funds. However, a proper rebound in private-sector investment is 
still lacking. Weak private-sector investment cannot be attributed to a 
‘profit squeeze’ in the corporate sector. On the contrary, the corporate 
sector has been doing very well, at least in those NMS for which relevant data 
are available. The corporate sector as a whole still tends to lend rather than 
borrow. The means available to the corporate sector appear to be plentiful at 
present – but the sector still prefers to lick its wounds inflicted by former 
excessive borrowing or extend loans (primarily to the public sector) rather 
than to invest productively. Loans are stagnant even in those instances where 
interest rates are relatively low. With a few exceptions (largely on the 
region’s periphery) the stocks of loans to the non-financial corporate sector 
increased marginally at best in 2014. This may reflect firms’ pessimistic 
assessment of future growth in demand, increased ‘liquidity preference’ or the 
relative abundance of the means at their disposal. Non-performing loans are 
linked to a high share of borrowing in foreign currencies. The recent 
strengthening of the Swiss franc will bear some negative consequences for 
those firms and households that borrowed heavily in that currency in the past. 
New evidence supports the claim that the countries with floating exchange 
rates fare better in the medium to long term. They tend to avoid irreversible 
currency overvaluation, whereas the countries with fixed exchange rates do not 
quite avert it. It is argued, however, that despite the rigidity of the 
exchange rates, overvaluation can be avoided – at least in the medium term. 
All the CESEE countries are running up fiscal deficits. Current account 
deficits are still depressed. Net national lending in the NMS tends to be 
positive. This is a consequence of current savings in the private sector in 
the NMS generally running ahead of gross fixed capital formation in that 
sector. On average, output growth across the NMS will become more uniform in 
2015 – albeit not any faster. Average growth will remain at 2.7% in 2015. Some 
acceleration in marginal growth is to be expected in the biennium 2016-2017. 
Unemployment in the NMS will recede only gradually. Low inflation will prevail 
in 2015, but it will gradually return to more normal levels in 2016. Under 
sustained – albeit rather anaemic – growth, the current account balances will 
deteriorate (although they will still remain comparatively low). Growth is 
hardly accelerating in the (current and potential) EU candidate countries 
either. Output in those countries is not expected to grow faster than in the 
NMS. Turkey, Macedonia and Kosovo may fare slightly better than the rest of 
the group, with growth rates of above 3% in 2015. However, with the exception 
of Turkey, those countries seem to have put high inflation behind them. 
Nonetheless, their unemployment figures continue to be dismal (less so only in 
Turkey). They will also run high (or even very high) current account deficits. 
Most of the successor states to the Soviet Union will perform rather badly in 
2015. Ukraine’s output will continue its free fall as many of the country’s 
industrial centres have become battlefields. A drop of 5% in economic growth 
is expected for 2015. The decline in world market prices for energy carriers 
will negatively affect both Kazakhstan and Russia, with real output in the 
latter country dropping sharply by almost 4% in 2015. A similar fate will 
befall Belarus a country that relies heavily on exports to Russia and Ukraine. 
However, assuming a peaceful resolution to the Ukrainian conflict in 2015, it 
is expected that all the successor states will resume moderate growth in 2016 
or 2017. | 
| Keywords: | Central and East European new EU Member States, Southeast Europe, Balkans, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Turkey, economic forecasts, secular stagnation, functional distribution of income, wage-led growth, investment, deflation, sectoral financial balances, deleveraging, exchange rates, beta convergence | 
| JEL: | C33 C50 E12 E20 E29 E65 E66 F02 F34 G01 G18 O52 P24 P27 P33 P52 | 
| Date: | 2015–03 | 
| URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wii:fpaper:fc:spring2015&r=cwa |