nep-cwa New Economics Papers
on Central and Western Asia
Issue of 2006‒12‒22
five papers chosen by
Nurdilek Hacialioglu
Open University

  1. Does Increased Access Increase Equality? Gender and Child Health Investments in India By Emily Oster
  2. ISE and Exchange Market Pressure By Mete Feridun
  3. How Far Can Domestic Credit Growth Explain Speculative Attacks? Empirical Evidence from Turkey By Mete Feridun
  4. Impact of Liquidity on Speculative Pressure in the Exchange Market By Mete Feridun
  5. Lowering Child Mortality in Poor Countries: The Power of Knowledgeable Parents By P Boone; Zhaoguo Zhan

  1. By: Emily Oster
    Abstract: Policymakers often argue that increasing access to health care is one crucial avenue for decreasing gender inequality in the developing world. Although this is generally true in the cross section, time series evidence does not always point to the same conclusion. This paper analyzes the relationship between access to child health investments and gender inequality in those health investments in India. A simple theory of gender-biased parental investment suggests that gender inequality may actually be non-monotonically related to access to health investments. At low levels of availability, investment in girls and boys is low but equal; as availability increases, boys get investments first, creating inequality. As availability increases further, girls also receive investments and equality is restored. I test this theory using data on the relationship between gender balance in vaccinations and the availability of "Health Camps" in India. I find support for a non-monotonic relationship. This result may shed light on the contrast between the cross-sectional and time-series evidence on gender and development, and may provide guidance for health policy in developing countries.
    JEL: I18 J13 J16 O12
    Date: 2006–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:12743&r=cwa
  2. By: Mete Feridun (Department of Economics, Loughborough University)
    Abstract: This article aims at investigating the long-run relationship between stock prices and speculative pressure in the Turkish exchange market through Granger-causality analysis for the period 1986:01-2006:11. For this purpose an Exchange Market Pressure Index is built using the weighted average of exchange rate changes, interest rate changes and foreign exchange reserve changes. This index is then used in pairwise causality analyses with Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) National-100 Index. Results of the ADF unit root tests suggest that the series are stationary. Hence, no-cointegration analysis was carried out before the Granger-causality tests. Results of Granger-causality indicates that there exists no long-run relationship between stock prices and the speculative pressure in the exchange market in Turkey.
    Keywords: currency crises; stock prices; co-integration; exchange market pressure.
    JEL: F3 E44
    Date: 2006–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lbo:lbowps:2006_22&r=cwa
  3. By: Mete Feridun (Department of Economics, Loughborough University)
    Abstract: Economies are susceptible to speculative attacks regardless of whether they use fixed or floating exchange rates. Turkish experience in the last two decades constitutes one of the most prominent examples proving this verdict. It is widely accepted that there is a link between domestic credit and speculative attacks on the currency. Nevertheless, the literature on currency crises clearly lacks a country-specific study that addresses the long-run relationship between this indicator and the speculative pressure in the exchange market. This article aims at filling this gap in the literature using monthly Turkish time series data spanning the period 1984:04- 2006:11. Results of the ADF unit root tests suggest that the series are stationary. Hence, no cointegration analysis was carried out before the Granger-causality tests. Granger causality tests fail to establish a causal relationship between domestic credit and exchange market pressure.
    Keywords: Speculative attacks; currency crises; domestic credit.
    JEL: F3 E44
    Date: 2006–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lbo:lbowps:2006_23&r=cwa
  4. By: Mete Feridun (Department of Economics, Loughborough University)
    Abstract: Economies are susceptible to speculative attacks regardless of whether they use fixed or floating exchange rates. Turkish experience in the last two decades constitutes one of the most prominent examples proving this verdict. It is widely accepted that narrow money (M1) is the most conventional measure of liquidity, excessive growth of which may fuel speculative attacks on the currency. The literature on currency crises clearly lacks a country-specific study that addresses the long-run relationship between this indicator and the speculative pressure in the exchange market. This article aims at filling this gap in the literature using monthly Turkish time series data spanning the period 1984:04- 2006:11. Results of the ADF unit root tests suggest that the series are stationary. Hence, no-cointegration analysis was carried out before the Granger-causality tests. Granger causality tests reveal strong evidence supporting univariate causality running from narrow money (M1) to exchange market pressure. This outcome lends empirical support to the Turkish policy makers’ current efforts to maintain a tight control of the money supply.
    Keywords: Speculative attacks; currency crises; domestic credit.
    JEL: F3 E44
    Date: 2006–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lbo:lbowps:2006_24&r=cwa
  5. By: P Boone; Zhaoguo Zhan
    Abstract: Why do over 20% of children die in some poor countries, while in others only 2% die? Weexamine this question using survey data covering 278,000 children in 45 low-income countries.We find that parents' education and a mother's propensity to seek out modern healthcare areempirically important when explaining child survival, while the prevalence of common diseases,along with infrastructure such as improved water and sanitation, are not. Using a GINIcoefficient we construct for treatment services, we find that public and private health systems are"equally unequal", that is, both tend to favor children in relatively well-off households, andneither appears superior at improving outcomes in very poor communities. These facts contrastwith a common view that a much-expanded public health sector is necessary to reduce childmortality. Instead, we believe the empirical evidence points to the essential role of parents asadvocates for their child's health. If we can provide better health knowledge and generaleducation to parents, a private healthcare sector can arise to meet demand. We provide evidencethat this alternative route to low mortality is indeed a reason behind the current success of manycountries with low child mortality, including Vietnam, Indonesia, Egypt, and the Indian state ofKerala. Finally, we calculate a realistic package of interventions that target education, healthknowledge and treatment seeking could reduce child mortality by 32%.
    JEL: I00 I1 I12 I18
    Date: 2006–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0751&r=cwa

This nep-cwa issue is ©2006 by Nurdilek Hacialioglu. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.