nep-cul New Economics Papers
on Cultural Economics
Issue of 2005‒11‒19
two papers chosen by
Roberto Zanola
Universita degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale

  1. Dynamic analysis of an institutional conflict within the music industry By Oleg V. Pavlov
  2. Financing of Media Firms: Does Competition Matter? By Hans Jarle Kind; Tore Nilssen; Lars Sørgard

  1. By: Oleg V. Pavlov (Social Science and Policy Studies WPI)
    Abstract: Peer-to-peer technology has made massive music piracy possible, which, in turn, has arguably had a significant economic impact on the recording industry. Record labels have responded to online piracy with litigation and are also considering self-help measures. It is currently not obvious whether or not these counter-piracy strategies will ultimately stifle online file sharing in the long term. With this paper we attempt to add to our understanding of the conflict within the institution that is the commercial music industry. We conduct an institutional analysis of the industry in transition and extend the traditional pattern modeling methodology with a formal resource-based model of a representative online music network. The model accounts for complex causal interactions between resources, private provision of common goods, free riding and membership dynamics. The numerical implementation of the model is the basis of a decision support system, which is used in a series of computer experiments that emulate anti-piracy scenarios. We show that a peer-to-peer system may be quite resilient to outside disturbances. The experiments also demonstrate that policies rank differently in their effectiveness based on a selected yardstick.
    Keywords: Peer-to-peer (P2P) networks; Online File Sharing; Copyright; Simulation
    JEL: K40 H40 C60
    Date: 2005–11–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sce:scecf5:233&r=cul
  2. By: Hans Jarle Kind (Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration); Tore Nilssen (University of Oslo); Lars Sørgard (Norwegian Competition Authority)
    Abstract: This paper analyses how competition between media firms influences the way they are financed. In a setting where monopoly media firms choose to be completely financed by consumer payments, competition may lead the media firms to be financed by advertising as well. The closer substitutes the media firms’ products are, the less they rely on consumer payment and the more they rely on advertising revenues. If media firms can invest in programming, they invest more the less differentiated the media products are perceived to be.
    Keywords: media; advertising; two-sided markets
    JEL: L22 L82 L86 M37
    Date: 2005–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:kud:kuieci:2005-08&r=cul

This nep-cul issue is ©2005 by Roberto Zanola. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.