|
on Contract Theory and Applications |
| By: | Leandro Arozamena; Juan José Ganuza; Federico Weinschelbaum |
| Abstract: | A sponsor –e.g. a government agency– uses a procurement auction to select a supplier who will be in charge of the execution of a contract. That contract is incomplete: it may be renegotiated once the auction's winner has been chosen. We examine a setting where one firm may bribe the agent in charge of monitoring contract execution so that the former is treated preferentially if renegotiation actually occurs. If a bribe is accepted, the corrupt firm will be more aggressive at the initial auction and thus win with a larger probability. We show that the equilibrium probability of corruption is larger when the initial contract is less complete, when the corrupt firm's cost is more likely to be similar to her rivals', and when it faces fewer competitors. |
| Keywords: | Auctions , procurement , corruption , renegotiation , cost overruns |
| JEL: | C72 D44 D82 |
| Date: | 2025–05 |
| URL: | https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:upf:upfgen:1906 |
| By: | Mariann Ollár; Antonio Penta |
| Abstract: | We study a framework for robust mechanism design that can accommodate various degrees of robustness with respect to agents’ beliefs, which encompasses both the belief-free and Bayesian settings as special cases. For general belief restrictions, we characterize the set of incentive compatible direct mechanisms in general environments with interdependent values. Our main results, which we obtain based on a first-order approach, inform the design of transfers via ‘belief-based’ terms to attain incentive compatibility. In environments that satisfy a property of generalized independence, our results imply a robust version of revenue equivalence in non-Bayesian settings. Instead, under a notion of comovement between types and beliefs, which extends the idea of correlated information to non-Bayesian settings, we show that any allocation rule can be implemented, even if standard single-crossing and monotonicity conditions do not hold. Yet, unless the environment is Bayesian, information rents typically remain, and they decrease monotonically as the robustness requirements are weakened. |
| Keywords: | incentive compatibility , moment conditions , interdependent values , belif restrictions , robust mechanism design |
| JEL: | D62 D82 D83 |
| Date: | 2025–09 |
| URL: | https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:upf:upfgen:1918 |
| By: | Nathan Hancart |
| Abstract: | I provide a sufficient condition under which a principal does not benefit from committing to a mechanism in economic models represented by a maximisation problem under constraints. These problems include mechanism design, principal-agent models or sender-receiver games. In principal-agent problems, this condition holds if the agent has a finite strategy space and the principal's value function is continuous in the mechanism. |
| Date: | 2025–10 |
| URL: | https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2510.07994 |