nep-cta New Economics Papers
on Contract Theory and Applications
Issue of 2020‒10‒19
two papers chosen by
Guillem Roig
University of Melbourne

  1. Incomplete Political Contracts with Secret Ballots: Reciprocity as a Force to Enforce Sustainable Clientelistic Relationships By Kenju Kamei
  2. Worker Empowerment and Subjective Evaluation: On Building an Effective Conflict Culture By W. Bentley MacLeod; Victoria Valle Lara; Christian Zehnder

  1. By: Kenju Kamei (Durham University Business School)
    Abstract: Clientelism is frequently observed in our societies. Various mechanisms that help sustain incomplete political contracts (e.g., monitoring and punishment) have been studied in the literature to date. However, do such contracts emerge in elections with secret ballots when the interactions are one-shot? How does repetition affect the evolution of incomplete political contracts? Using an incentivized experiment, this paper finds that even during one-shot interactions where monitoring is not possible, candidates form incomplete contracts through vote buying and promise-making. The candidates’ clientelistic behaviors are heterogeneous: some target swing voters, whereas others offer the most to loyal voters, or even opposition voters. These tactics distort voting behaviors as well as election outcomes. Repeated interactions significantly magnify candidates’ offers and deepen clientelistic relationships. These results underscore the possibility that clientelism evolves due to people’s strategic behaviors and interdependent preferences, without relying on alternative mechanism
    Keywords: experiment, cooperation, vote buying, election, clientelism
    JEL: C92 D72
    Date: 2020–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dur:durham:2020_04&r=all
  2. By: W. Bentley MacLeod; Victoria Valle Lara; Christian Zehnder
    Abstract: Although conflicts typically lead to a waste of resources, organizations may still benefit from a corporate culture that tolerates or even encourages conflicts. The reason is that coordinated conflicts may help to enforce informal contracts and foster cooperation. In this paper we report results of a series of laboratory experiments designed to explore whether and under what conditions an efficiency-enhancing conflict culture can emerge. Using a principal-worker setup with subjective performance evaluation, we show that establishing a functional conflict culture is a delicate matter. If conflicts are encouraged in a careless, hands-off manner, the destructive side of conflicts is likely to dominate. To be successful a conflict culture requires a careful management of fairness norms. In our experiment we find that conflicts have positive net effects on efficiency only if an explicit code of conduct is established and conflicts are institutionalized through a grievance process. Thus, providing workers with more power may be a necessary but not sufficient condition for improving productivity when performance evaluations are subjective.
    JEL: D02 D03 J33 J41 M5 M52
    Date: 2020–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27857&r=all

This nep-cta issue is ©2020 by Guillem Roig. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.