nep-cta New Economics Papers
on Contract Theory and Applications
Issue of 2018‒10‒15
four papers chosen by
Guillem Roig
University of Melbourne

  1. Permanent contracts and job satisfaction in academia: Evidence from European countries By Fulvio Castellacci; Clara Viñas-Bardolet
  2. A revisit of the Borch rule for the Principal-Agent Risk-Sharing problem By Jessica Martin; Anthony Réveillac
  3. Raising Capital from Heterogeneous Investors By Marina Halac; Ilan Kremer; Eyal Winter
  4. Farmland rental values in GM soybean areas of Argentina : do contractual arrangements matter ? By Pascale Phelinas; Johanna Choumert

  1. By: Fulvio Castellacci (TIK Centre, University of Oslo); Clara Viñas-Bardolet (TIK Centre, University of Oslo)
    Abstract: Temporary contracts are increasingly used in academia. This is a major concern for non-tenured researchers, since weak job security may hamper job satisfaction. In spite of the relevance of this topic, scholarly research on the theme is scant. This paper presents an empirical analysis of the role of academic tenure for job satisfaction of researchers in European countries. The work uses data from the MORE2 survey, a recent large-scale representative survey of researchers in all European countries. The results show that, ceteris paribus, academics with a permanent contract are on average more satisfied with their job than those that are employed on a temporary basis. We also show that academic tenure is a relatively more important factor of job satisfaction for researchers at an intermediate stage of the career. Finally, we point out some important differences in the working of the model among European countries. Our hypotheses receive significant empirical support for the groups of Continental EU and Nordic economies, which combine high job satisfaction and good working conditions, on the one hand, with relatively weak job security for younger academics, on the other.
    Date: 2018–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tik:inowpp:20181008&r=cta
  2. By: Jessica Martin (INSA Toulouse - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, IMT - Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse UMR5219 - UT1 - Université Toulouse 1 Capitole - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UPS - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées - PRES Université de Toulouse - INSA Toulouse - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique); Anthony Réveillac (INSA Toulouse - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, IMT - Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse UMR5219 - UT1 - Université Toulouse 1 Capitole - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UPS - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées - PRES Université de Toulouse - INSA Toulouse - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
    Abstract: In this paper we provide a new approach to tackle the Principal-Agent Risk-Sharing problem using optimal stochastic control technics. Our analysis relies on an optimal decomposition of the expected utility of the Principal in terms of the reservation utility of the Agent. In particular, this allows us to derive the Borch rule as a necessary optimality condition for this decomposition to hold, which sheds a new light on this economic concept. As a by-product, this approach provides a class of risk-sharing plans that satisfy the Borch rule; class to which the optimal plan belongs.
    Keywords: Principal Agent problem,Risk-Sharing,Borch rule,Reverse Hölder inequality,Optimal Contracting Theory
    Date: 2018–09–14
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01874707&r=cta
  3. By: Marina Halac; Ilan Kremer; Eyal Winter
    Abstract: A rm raises capital from multiple investors to fund a project. The project succeeds only if the capital raised exceeds a stochastic threshold, and the rm offers payments contingent on success. We study the rm's optimal unique-implementation scheme, namely the scheme that guarantees the rm the maximum payoff. This scheme pays investors differential net returns (per unit of capital) depending on the size of their investments. We show that if the distribution of the investment threshold is log-concave, larger investors receive higher net returns than smaller investors. Moreover, higher dispersion in investor size increases the rm's payoff. Our analysis highlights strategic risk as an important potential driver of inequality.
    Keywords: mechanism design, contracting with externalities, collective action problem, strategic complementarities, unique implementation
    JEL: D86 G24 L24
    Date: 2018
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lan:wpaper:245773051&r=cta
  4. By: Pascale Phelinas (CESSMA UMRD 245 - Centre d'études en sciences sociales sur les mondes africains, américains et asiatiques - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Inalco - Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales - UPD7 - Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7); Johanna Choumert (EDI - Economic Development Initiatives - Economic Development Initiatives [EDI])
    Date: 2018–09–17
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:ird-01875351&r=cta

This nep-cta issue is ©2018 by Guillem Roig. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.