nep-cta New Economics Papers
on Contract Theory and Applications
Issue of 2018‒01‒15
three papers chosen by
Guillem Roig
University of Melbourne

  1. Vertical Foreclosure and Multi-Segment Competition By Jullien, Bruno; Reisinger, Markus; Rey, Patrick
  2. Screening procrastinators with automatiic-renewal contracts By JOHNEN Johannes
  3. Input price discrimination with secret linear contracting By Ioannis N. Pinopoulos

  1. By: Jullien, Bruno; Reisinger, Markus; Rey, Patrick
    Abstract: This paper analyzes a supplier's incentives to foreclose downstream entry when entrants have stronger positions in different market segments, thus bringing added value as well as competition. We first consider the case where wholesale contracts take the form of linear tariffs, and characterize the conditions under which the competition-intensifying effect dominates, thereby leading to foreclosure. We then show that foreclosure can still occur with non-linear tari¤s, even coupled with additional provisions such as resale price maintenance.
    Keywords: Foreclosure; Vertical Contracting; Customer Segments; Downstream Competition
    JEL: D43 K21 L12 L42
    Date: 2017–12–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tse:wpaper:32305&r=cta
  2. By: JOHNEN Johannes (CORE, Université catholique de Louvain)
    Abstract: Automatic contract renewals are a common feature in consumer markets and a frequent concern among policy makers. They can be used to exploit consumer inertia when consumers forgo benefits from switching to better alternatives. I consider two sources for th
    Keywords: Limited Attention, Automatic Contract Renewal, Price Discrimination, Present Bias, Naiveté
    JEL: D03 D18 D41 D42 D82
    Date: 2017–11–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cor:louvco:2017030&r=cta
  3. By: Ioannis N. Pinopoulos (Department of Economics, University of Macedonia)
    Abstract: We study the welfare effects of input price discrimination when an unconstrained upstream supplier uses linear contracts that are unobservable by downstream firms. With homogeneous final goods, we show that banning input price discrimination decreases welfare. This finding is in contrast to that in the existing literature that considers observable linear contracts. When final goods are sufficiently differentiated, it is shown that banning input price discrimination increases welfare. This result is in contrast to that in the existing literature that considers unobservable two-part tariff contracts..
    Keywords: Input price discrimination; linear contracts; welfare.
    JEL: D43 L11 L42
    Date: 2018–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mcd:mcddps:2018_01&r=cta

This nep-cta issue is ©2018 by Guillem Roig. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.