nep-cta New Economics Papers
on Contract Theory and Applications
Issue of 2017‒02‒26
four papers chosen by
Guillem Roig
University of Melbourne

  1. Sticking Points: Common-Agency Problems and Contracting in the U.S. Healthcare System By Brigham Frandsen; Michael Powell; James B. Rebitzer
  2. Dynamic contracting: an irrelevance theorem By Péter Eső; Balázs Szentes
  3. Public vs Nonprofit Incarceration: The Case of The Netherlands By Mattheus Wassenaar; Raymond Gradus; Toon Molleman
  4. Optimal Design for a Partially Informed Auctioneer Abstract: This paper studies a competitive environment with an informed third party. A considerable number of people are employed to buy things for organizations. However, no satisfactory rationale for them is found in the standard mechanism. In the model, each seller has an additional information dimension that is not associated with a contractible action. The non-contractibility makes a contract incomplete in a direct mechanism with sellers. The solution is to hire a better informed auctioneer and construct an informational hierarchical structure by characterizing his incentives. The optimal compensation for the auctioneer highlights a new role for reserve prices as a revelation device. In addition, we design a practical auction format to implement the optimal mechanism. By Seung Han Yoo

  1. By: Brigham Frandsen; Michael Powell; James B. Rebitzer
    Abstract: We propose a "common-agency" model for explaining inefficient contracting in the U.S. healthcare system. In our setting, common-agency problems arise when multiple payers seek to motivate a shared provider to invest in improved care coordination. Our approach differs from other common-agency models in that we analyze "sticking points," that is, equilibria in which payers coordinate around Pareto-dominated contracts that do not offer providers incentives to implement efficient investments. These sticking points offer a straightforward explanation for three long observed but hard to explain features of the U.S. healthcare system: the ubiquity of fee-for-service contracting arrangements outside of Medicare; problematic care coordination; and the historic reliance on small, single specialty practices rather than larger multi-specialty group practices to deliver care. The common-agency model also provides insights on the effects of policies, such as Accountable Care Organizations, that aim to promote more efficient forms of contracting between payers and providers.
    JEL: D8 I10 I18
    Date: 2017–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23177&r=cta
  2. By: Péter Eső; Balázs Szentes
    Abstract: This paper generalizes a conceptual insight in dynamic contracting with quasilinear payoffs: the principal does not need to pay any information rents for extracting the agent's “new” private information obtained after signing the contract. This is shown in a general model in which the agent's type stochastically evolves over time, and her payoff (which is linear in transfers) depends on the entire history of private and any contractible information, contractible decisions, and her hidden actions. The contract is offered by the principal in the presence of initial informational asymmetry. The model can be transformed into an equivalent one where the agent's subsequent information is independent in each period (type orthogonalization). We show that for any fixed decision–action rule implemented by a mechanism, the agent's rents (as well as the principal's maximal revenue) are the same as if the principal could observe and contract on the agent's orthogonalized types after the initial period. We also show that any monotonic decision–action rule can be implemented in a Markovian environment satisfying certain regularity conditions, and we provide a simple “recipe” for solving such dynamic contracting problems.
    JEL: D82 D83 D86
    Date: 2017–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:69403&r=cta
  3. By: Mattheus Wassenaar (VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands); Raymond Gradus (VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands); Toon Molleman (Custodial Institutions Agency, The Netherlands)
    Abstract: Outsourcing of detention is a complex public task, due to quality risks from incomplete contracts, the public responsibility for sentencing and execution, and related social opinions. In the Netherlands, the debate about the outsourcing of prison services to the private profit sector has recently restarted. At the same time, in the Netherlands there is extensive experience of outsourcing prison services – in particular for juvenile detention and internal forensic psychiatric care – to nonprofit organizations. In the Dutch experience, we have not found differences between public and nonprofit execution, with respect to the type of contract with the prisons, costs and quality. The Dutch experience shows that outsourcing to nonprofit entrepreneurs in civil society can be an alternative to outsourcing to the private market.
    Keywords: nonprofit organizations; contracting out; prison services
    JEL: H40 L31
    Date: 2017–02–20
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tin:wpaper:20170023&r=cta
  4. By: Seung Han Yoo (Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea)
    Keywords: Two types of information, Auction, Information structure
    JEL: C72
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iek:wpaper:1702&r=cta

This nep-cta issue is ©2017 by Guillem Roig. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.