nep-cta New Economics Papers
on Contract Theory and Applications
Issue of 2012‒06‒25
ten papers chosen by
Simona Fabrizi
Massey University, Albany

  1. Public firm incentives under asymmetric information and prospect of deregulation and privatization By Huric Larsen, J.F.
  2. Information Acquisition under (Im)perfect Data Privacy By Simeon Schudy; Verena Utikal
  3. The SURE Program: An Investigation of Moral Hazard Opportunities and Adverse Selection Effects By Bekkerman, Anton; Smith, Vincent H.; Watts, Myles J.
  4. How to Design Infrastructure Contracts in a Warming World? A Critical Appraisal of Public-Private Partnerships By Martimort, David; Straub, Stéphane
  5. How to Design Infrastructure Contracts in a Warming World? A Critical Appraisal of Public-Private Partnerships By Martimort, David; Straub, Stéphane
  6. Who Participates in Risk Transfer Markets? The Role of Transaction Costs and Counterparty Risk By Stephens, Eric; Thompson, James
  7. Corruption and the Public Display of Wealth By Simona Fabrizi; Steffen Lippert
  8. Stock Market Tournaments By Ozdenoren, Emre; Yuan, Kathy
  9. Fat-tail Climate Risks, Mechanism design, and Reputation* By Banerjee, Prasenjit; Shogren, Jason F.
  10. A Numerical Approach to the Contract Theory: the Case of Moral Hazard By Hideo Hashimoto; Kojun Hamada; Nobuhiro Hosoe

  1. By: Huric Larsen, J.F.
    Abstract: Governments dislike poorly performing public firms and often see deregulation and privatisation as a way to improve performance and social welfare. From a theoretical point of view poor performance may be due to information asymmetries between the informed public firm and the relatively uninformed regulator. The point of view in the paper is that the information asymmetries that makes the regulator unable to achieve first best during regulation, is also the cause of deregulation and privatization failure. The effect on public firm incentives from introducing deregulation as a consequence from choosing a specific regulation contract is analysed.
    Keywords: Regulation; public firms; incentives; optimal deregulation; asymmetric information; deregulation; privatization; contracts; public policy
    JEL: D21 D82 D01
    Date: 2012–03–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:39351&r=cta
  2. By: Simeon Schudy; Verena Utikal
    Abstract: We investigate the consequences of imperfect data privacy on information acquisition about personal health status. In a simplified game of persuasion players decide on whether or not to acquire information about their health status before searching for a matching partner (e.g. an insurance company). We contrast three institutional settings: automatic dissemination of certified test results, perfect data privacy and imperfect data privacy about certified test results (i.e. potentially involuntary dissemination). Assuming that the ex-ante expected payoff of a match with an unknown type is positive, we find that equilibria with complete information acquisition and complete information revelation exist only under perfect and imperfect data privacy whereas equilibria without any information acquisition exist under all institutional settings. We test our predictions in a laboratory experiment. Indeed, both imperfect and perfect data privacy yield almost perfect information acquisition. Automatic dissemination leads to incomplete information acquisition.
    Keywords: data privacy, endogenous information acquisition, health, experiment
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:twi:respas:0076&r=cta
  3. By: Bekkerman, Anton; Smith, Vincent H.; Watts, Myles J.
    Abstract: The Supplemental Revenue Assistance Payments (SURE) program, introduced in the 2008 Farm Bill, provides disaster aid payments to producers in counties eligible for disaster payments and individual producers with crop production losses that exceed 50% of their expected yields. We show that the program’s "rules of the game" create moral hazard and adverse selection incentives. Then, we empirically analyze possible moral hazard and adverse selection behavior in response to the SURE program by corn, soybean, and wheat producers. Results suggest that recent increases in crop insurance participation may be due to increased moral hazard and adverse selection incentives.
    Keywords: Risk and Uncertainty,
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea12:124178&r=cta
  4. By: Martimort, David; Straub, Stéphane
    Abstract: We analyze how uncertainty regarding future climate conditions affects the design of concession contracts, organizational forms and technological choices in a principal-agent context with dynamic moral hazard, limited liability and irreversibility constraints. The prospect of future, uncertain productivity shocks on the returns on the firm’s effort creates an option value of delaying efforts which exacerbates agency costs. Contracts and organizational forms are drafted to control this cost of delegated flexibility. Our analysis is relevant for infrastructure sectors that are sensitive to changing weather conditions and sheds a pessimistic light on the relevance of Public-Private Partnerships in this context.
    JEL: D82 L32 Q54
    Date: 2012–05–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tse:wpaper:25892&r=cta
  5. By: Martimort, David; Straub, Stéphane
    Abstract: We analyze how uncertainty regarding future climate conditions affects the design of concession contracts, organizational forms and technological choices in a principal-agent context with dynamic moral hazard, limited liability and irreversibility constraints. The prospect of future, uncertain productivity shocks on the returns on the firm’s effort creates an option value of delaying efforts which exacerbates agency costs. Contracts and organizational forms are drafted to control this cost of delegated flexibility. Our analysis is relevant for infrastructure sectors that are sensitive to changing weather conditions and sheds a pessimistic light on the relevance of Public-Private Partnerships in this context.
    JEL: D82 L32 Q54
    Date: 2012–05–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ide:wpaper:25890&r=cta
  6. By: Stephens, Eric (University of Alberta, Department of Economics); Thompson, James (University of Waterloo)
    Abstract: We analyze the role of transaction costs in risk transfer markets. For example, when these markets are in their infancy, they are characterized by few contracts and high transaction costs. In this case, we show that only highly risk-averse buyers (e.g., hedgers) exist in the market alongside high quality counterparties, and no asymmetric information can be present on either the quality of the risk being transferred or the quality of the counterparty to which the risk is ceded. With lower transaction costs, we show that less risk-averse buyers (e.g., speculators) will enter the market thereby increasing risk transfer; however, these buyers will choose to contract with less stable counterparties. When transaction costs are low, we show that asymmetric information on the quality of the risk being transferred and of the quality of the counterparties can exist in equilibrium. Finally, we analyze the effect of a transaction tax, which is viewed simply as an increase in transaction costs. Such a tax is shown to push relatively less risk-averse buyers out of the market, which tends to reduce the relative number of unstable counterparties. In addition, we show that it reduces the rents that can be extracted due to asymmetric information.
    Keywords: risk transfer; transaction costs; counterparty risk; transaction taxes
    JEL: G00 G14 G22
    Date: 2012–06–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ris:albaec:2012_012&r=cta
  7. By: Simona Fabrizi (School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, New Zealand); Steffen Lippert (Department of Economics, University of Otago, New Zealand)
    Abstract: We build a principal-agent-client model of corruption, allowing for heterogeneity in the value of public projects relative to the cost of monitoring their execution and for uncertainty of corruptors regarding the value of a project conducted. We derive the conditions under which officials with low-value projects have an incentive to signal their projects' type, and thereby facilitate their corruption, by means of public displays of wealth. While such public displays reduce the probability with which bribes are offered to officials conducting high-value projects, they increase the probability with which these officials accept bribes sufficiently to offset any positive effect.
    Keywords: Corruption, Incentives, Signaling, Public Displays of Wealth
    JEL: D73 D82
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:otg:wpaper:1202&r=cta
  8. By: Ozdenoren, Emre; Yuan, Kathy
    Abstract: We propose a new theory of suboptimal risk-taking based on contractual externalities. We examine an industry with a continuum of firms. Each firm's manager exerts costly hidden effort The productivity of effort is subject to systematic shocks. Firms' stock prices reflect their performance relative to the industry average. In this setting, stock-based incentives cause complementarities in managerial effort choices. Externalities arise because shareholders do not internalize the impact of their incentive provision on the average effort. During booms, they over-incentivise managers, triggering a rat-race in effort exertion, resulting in excessive risk relative to the second-best. The opposite occurs during busts.
    Keywords: Contractual Externalities; Excessive Risk-Taking; Insufficient Risk-Taking; Stock-Based Incentives
    JEL: D86 G01 G30
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9000&r=cta
  9. By: Banerjee, Prasenjit; Shogren, Jason F.
    Abstract: This paper investigates the interaction between consumers and producers in designing incentive mechanism for climate protection. Firms have material interests in building a moral reputation for those consumers who prefer buying from socially responsible firms. We examine optimal monetary transfer by addressing crowding out effect due to reputation. We find green reputation leads to overprotection and brown firms buy reputation if consumers have strong preference on green products. When consumers care less about firms’ reputation, firms do not have any incentive to buy reputation.
    Keywords: Asymmetric Information, Climate change, Crowding out, Mechanism Design, Reputation., Consumer/Household Economics, D02, D03, Q15, Q34, Q57,
    Date: 2012–06–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea12:124920&r=cta
  10. By: Hideo Hashimoto (Osaka University); Kojun Hamada (Niigata University); Nobuhiro Hosoe (National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies)
    Abstract: We develop a few numerical models to examine the moral hazard problems exemplified by Itoh (2003, Ch. 4), following our earlier study (Hashimoto et al. (2011)) on the adverse selection problems. To this end, we first model a risk averse or risk neutral entrepreneur who selects his action among two options (e.g., low efforts and high efforts). The results of the models, whose computer programs are explained in detail for novice modelers, numerically illustrate the essence of the contract theory analysis. Second, the similar models, applied to the case with three effort level options, are built with and without the assumptions often employed to simplify the theoretical analysis. Through these exercises the significance of such assumptions in the contract theory analysis would be understood clearly.
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ngi:dpaper:12-03&r=cta

This nep-cta issue is ©2012 by Simona Fabrizi. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.