nep-cse New Economics Papers
on Economics of Strategic Management
Issue of 2012‒09‒22
thirteen papers chosen by
Joao Jose de Matos Ferreira
University of the Beira Interior

  1. Innovation and Technology Transfer across Countries By Neil Foster
  2. Regional innovation performance in Europe By Marta Foddi; Stefano Usai
  3. Innovation and performance in KIBS: The moderating role of standard and modular services By Anna Cabigiosu; Diego Campagnolo
  4. Entrepreneurial employees: Are they different from independent entrepreneurs? By Nyström, Kristina
  5. Balancing customization and standardization in knowledge intensive business services: The use of modular service architectures By Anna Cabigiosu; Diego Campagnolo; Andrea Furlan; Giovanni Costa
  6. Innovation at the Firm Level across Countries with Different Economic and Technological Capacity By Andreas Reinstaller; Fabian Unterlass
  7. R&D Determinants: accounting for the differences between research and development By Barge-Gil, Andrés; López, Alberto
  8. An "extended" knowledge production function approach to the genesis of innovation in the European regions By Sylvie Charlot; Riccardo Crescenzi; Antonio Musolesi
  9. Prevalence and Longitudinal Trends of Early Internationalisation Patterns among Canadian SMEs By Sui, Sui; Yu, Zhihao; Baum , Matthias
  10. Globalization and Regional Innovation in China By Hein Roelfsema; Yi Zhang
  11. Fostering innovation in Russian companies in the post-crisis period: Opportunities and constraints By Simachev, Yuri; Kuzyk, Mikhail; Ivanov , Denis
  12. The performance of trading firms in the services sectors – Comparable evidence from four EU countries By Jože Damijan; Stefanie A. Haller; Ville Kaitila; Mika Maliranta; Emmanuel Milet; Matija Rojec; Daniel Mirza
  13. Competitive Effects of Merger Remedies in Europe's High-Tech Industry By Petar Angelov; Stephanie Rosenkranz; Hans Schenk

  1. By: Neil Foster (The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw)
    Abstract: Innovation is considered to be an important determinant of performance at the firm, industry and country level. This view is supported by empirical evidence showing the importance of innovative activities on firm and industry performance and country growth rates. The majority of the world’s R&D is concentrated in a handful of countries however, meaning that domestic innovation is of little importance for most countries. Such countries can benefit from innovation conducted elsewhere however, if knowledge and technology is diffused across borders. In this paper we survey existing literature on innovation and technology diffusion and discuss descriptive statistics on the extent of innovation and technology diffusion across countries to provide insights into the likely developments in innovation and diffusion.
    Keywords: Innovation, technology diffusion, R&D internationalization
    JEL: O3
    Date: 2012–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wii:rpaper:rr:380&r=cse
  2. By: Marta Foddi; Stefano Usai
    Abstract: Europe 2020 strategy and the initiative “Innovation Union” call for a particular attention at the territorial dimension of innovation and knowledge creation. The heterogeneity across regions in their capacity to create knowledge and innovation, but also in their abilities to exploit ideas and technologies available across the European territory, motivates in-depth analyses of the territorial dimension of the knowledge economy. This paper investigates the nature of knowledge production and diffusion among regions in 29 EU countries and tries to assess its effectiveness. The analysis follows a two-step analytical route. Firstly, as a preliminary analysis, we estimate a knowledge production function (Griliches, 1979 and many others) with the usual parametric methods, in order to find out which are the main determinants of knowledge production at the regional level in Europe. Secondly, based on these findings, we apply DEA to assess the degree of efficiency of European regions in their use of internal and external inputs for the production of new knowledge and ideas. This allows to provide a ranking of the innovative performance of EU regions for two points in time, the beginning of the current century and the second part of this decade. Such rankings will be evaluated thanks to the Malmquist productivity index in order to assess the relative importance of its main components. According to the Data Envelopment Analysis, we found further evidence of a dualistic (centre vs periphery) pattern in the regional innovation activities, with the highest efficient territories located in the most central or economically strategic areas of the continent. On the contrary, the application of the Malmquist productivity index shows that productivity dynamics has been extremely differentiated across regions in terms of both magnitude and intrinsic features. We, again, observe important differences between the core and periphery of Europe and most specifically between the countries which are rich and industrialized and form the so called “Old Europe” and those which are relatively poor and have entered the European Union quite recently.
    Keywords: innovation; human capital; spatial spillovers; European regions; DEA
    JEL: C13 C61 O33 R11
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cns:cnscwp:201221&r=cse
  3. By: Anna Cabigiosu (Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia); Diego Campagnolo (Department of Economics and Management, Università di Padova)
    Abstract: In this paper we study the relationship between service innovation and firm's performances in the KIBS domain. In line with previous works, we maintain that service innovation positively impacts firm's performances but we also claim that this relationship is likely to be moderated by how the service firm conceives its service configuration. Particularly, we point out that service configurations based on standard and modular services positively moderate the positive relationship between innovation and performance. Using a sample of 239 Italian KIBS firms, we empirically test our model. Results confirm that service innovation is positively associated with firmÕs performances both as market size and, albeit weakly, as ROI growth. Results also confirm the positive moderating role of standard services while the moderating role of modular services is only marginal. Overall, we contribute to the existing literature of KIBS and service innovation showing that service innovation and service customization should be considered as separate and that KIBS firms can experience increasing returns if they are able to combine service innovation and service standardization.
    Keywords: Services, Innovation, Performance, Standard services, Modular services
    JEL: O32 O33
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:vnm:wpdman:23&r=cse
  4. By: Nyström, Kristina (CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Royal Institute of Technology)
    Abstract: This paper uses individual-level data from the Swedish 2011 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) to investigate differences with respect to individual characteristics associated with independent entrepreneurs (nascent entrepreneurship and new business ownership) and entrepreneurial employees. Are there any differences with respect to gender, age, income and education associated with these different forms of entrepreneurship? Furthermore, it can be argued that an entrepreneurial employee differs with respect to attitudes and perceptions about entrepreneurship. Do attitudes and perceptions about entrepreneurship, for example, perceiving entrepreneurship as good career choice, or the fear of failure differ between entrepreneurial employees and independent entrepreneurs? Our empirical findings shows what differs between entrepreneurial employees and independent entrepreneurs are their perceptions about opportunities and capabilities. Moreover, the probability of becoming an entrepreneurial employee increases with the level of education.
    Keywords: Entrepreneurial employees; Global Entrepreneurship monitor; Sweden
    JEL: D20 J24 L26
    Date: 2012–09–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0281&r=cse
  5. By: Anna Cabigiosu (Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia); Diego Campagnolo (Department of Economics and Management, Università di Padova); Andrea Furlan (Department of Economics and Management, Università di Padova); Giovanni Costa (Department of Economics and Management, Università di Padova)
    Abstract: While the mainstream literature on knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) has long emphasized their customized nature and their role in exploring new knowledge to satisfy each client's needs, recent research has argued that competition is inducing KIBS firms to standardize their offer. In this paper, we concentrate on a particular type of KIBS firms, third-party logistic service providers (TPLs), and analyze how two TPLs face the customization-standardization trade-off by using service architectures. We find that TPLs do not trade off customization for standardization, instead they manage to pursue both simultaneously relying on modular services, which constitutive elements are standard procedures. Service modularity enables the TPL to exploit its existing knowledge base while only some knowledgeable clients prompt TPLs to explore new procedures. Overall, our results suggest that service customization and knowledge exploration can be separated. TPLs should manage their customer relationships using a portfolio approach, balancing supply relationships in which they replicate existing services with partnership-based relationships with competent customers in which they develop new procedures. Managing the temporal separation between exploration and exploitation consequently becomes a core competence.
    Keywords: Services, Innovation, Performance, Standard services, Modular services
    JEL: O32 O33
    Date: 2012–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:vnm:wpdman:24&r=cse
  6. By: Andreas Reinstaller (WIFO); Fabian Unterlass (WIFO)
    Abstract: This paper presents an analysis of innovation behaviour at the firm level across countries with different levels of technological capabilities and economic development. Using data from the Community Innovation Survey for 20 European countries the paper shows that the impact of total innovation expenditures – including next to R&D also outlays for technology transfer, the market introduction of innovations or new designs – increases monotonically across countries with their level of technological capabilities. R&D investments instead have a significant impact on the generation of innovations only for firms located in countries with higher levels of technological capabilities. Firm specific competencies to suggest or contribute to innovation projects have a more significant effect on the innovation output the higher the level of economic development of the countries in which firms are located. Finally, the paper presents also evidence that R&D does not generally increase the absorptive capabilities of firms.
    Keywords: Innovation decision, Catching up, Technological capabilities, R&D
    Date: 2012–09–14
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wfo:wpaper:y:2012:i:436&r=cse
  7. By: Barge-Gil, Andrés; López, Alberto
    Abstract: The determinants of R&D are an important topic of industrial economics. The classical Schumpeterian hypotheses about the influence of size and market power have been complemented with the role played by industry determinants, such as demand pull, technological opportunity and appropriability, in determining R&D investments. However, R&D has always been considered as a whole, even though research and development are different activities with different purposes, knowledge bases, people involved and management styles. We take advantage of a new panel database of innovative Spanish firms (PITEC) to distinguish between research and development efforts of firms. We analyze the role jointly played by traditional R&D determinants in driving research and development, accounting for the differences between both activities. Results show that demand pull and appropriability have a higher effect on development, while technological opportunity is more influential for research. Differences are statistically significant, important in magnitude, and robust to the use of different indicators for demand pull, technological opportunity and appropriability and to several robustness checks.
    Keywords: R&D Determinants; Schumpeterian hypotheses; Demand pull; Technological opportunity; Appropriability
    JEL: O3
    Date: 2012–09–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:41270&r=cse
  8. By: Sylvie Charlot; Riccardo Crescenzi; Antonio Musolesi
    Abstract: The paper looks at the genesis of innovation in the EU regions in order to shed light on the link between innovative inputs (R&D and Human Capital) and the genesis of economically valuable knowledge. The "traditional" regional Knowledge Production Function (KPF) is innovatively developed in three complementary directions. First, the KPF is "augmented" in order to control for all possible "unobservable" and "immeasurable" time varying factors that influence the genesis of innovation (i.e. localised institutional and relational factors, regional innovation policies). Second, a semi-parametric approach that relaxes any arbitrary assumption on the "shape" of the KPF is adopted. Finally, the assumption of homogeneity in the impact of R&D and Human Capital is relaxed by explicitly accounting for the differences between "core" and "peripheral" regions. The econometric results confirm the importance of accounting for time varying unobserved heterogeneity through the adoption of a "random growth" specification: R&D efforts exert a significant influence on innovation only after controlling for regional specific time varying unobserved factors. In addition the semi-parametric approach uncovers significant threshold effects for both R&D expenditure and Human Capital and highlights a strong complementary between these two factors. However, "core" regions benefit from a persistent advantage in terms of the "productivity" of their innovation inputs. This has important implications for the EU innovation policies at the regional level.
    Keywords: Innovation, Regions, Knowledge production function, Europe, Semi-parametric models
    JEL: O32 R11 C14 C23
    Date: 2012–09–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ceo:wpaper:39&r=cse
  9. By: Sui, Sui; Yu, Zhihao; Baum , Matthias
    Abstract: Purpose: Recently, studies call for a more nuanced perspective on different internationalization patterns pursued by early internationalizers. These studies argue that most Born Global firms turn out to be Born Regional and that the proportion of true Born Global firms would be overestimated. Moreover, literature claims that the proportion of Born Global firms increases over time due to macroeconomic trends. We investigate these assumptions by providing a dynamic perspective on the prevalence of different types of internationalization patterns among Canadian small and medium-sized exporters (SMEs). Design/methodology/approach: To empirically examine the ideas above, we constructed a unique large-scale longitudinal (1997–2004) dataset. A multinomial logit model is employed to estimate a firm’s predicted probability, ceteris paribus, of choosing different internationalization patterns: Born Global, Born Regional, and Gradual Internationalization. Findings: We find that Born Global firms indeed account for a smaller proportion than Born Regional firms (16% vs. 27%). However, we find evidence that Born Globals and Born Regionals are increasingly established over time and that macroeconomic factors seem to account for this development at least partially. Originality/value Combining a rigorous empirical analysis with a unique large scale longitudinal dataset, we address two fundamental research questions in the international entrepreneurship (IE) literature a) which internationalization pattern prevails and b) if the Born Global pattern is increasingly established over time. We therewith theoretically contribute by comparing the predictive value of different internationalization frameworks international new venture (INV) framework, stage-models and regionalization hypothesis), toward which there is considerable current debate.
    Keywords: International New Ventures; Born Globals; Born Regionals; Longitudinal Study; Regional Strategy; Internationalization Process
    JEL: F13 O51
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:41177&r=cse
  10. By: Hein Roelfsema; Yi Zhang
    Abstract: This paper explores the connection between the external opening of China and differences in innovation across Chinese regions. Controlling for locational advantages and fixed regional characteristics, for the period 1995-2010 overall we find that regions that have increased most the connections to the world market have become more innovative when compared to other regions. By interacting regional characteristics with openness, we find a U-shaped relation between regional income levels and innovation, where both the lower middle-income and the most advanced regions gain from globalization in terms of increased innovation and productivity. In relative terms, the higher middle-income regions gain less from globalization than the other regions. By examining the nature of international activities across regions, we conjecture that differences in the ownership structures of foreign investments and the nature of linkages between foreign and domestic firms are at the hart of this finding, as the higher middle-income regions have higher outsourcing levels and thus benefit less from foreign technology transfers.
    Keywords: Globalization, Innovation, Regional Development, China
    JEL: F14 F21 F23 O33 O53
    Date: 2012–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:use:tkiwps:1215&r=cse
  11. By: Simachev, Yuri; Kuzyk, Mikhail; Ivanov , Denis
    Abstract: In recent years the Russian innovation policy has made a significant progress that manifests in developing its ‘tool kit’, increasing resource base, etc. However it has not yet succeeded in improving business innovation activities that remain local thus not giving prerequisites to transform the general macroeconomic context. Basing on a survey of more than 600 Russian industrial enterprises the authors analyze key features of innovation in Russian companies under economic recovery, as well as stimuli and obstacles for innovation activities. In particular, the paper shows that lack of competition is the key factor discouraging innovation and that the most limiting constraints to business innovation activities are instable economic environment and intra-corporate bureaucratization. Significant attention is paid to the analysis of the use of various instruments of state support for innovation and their beneficiaries. One of the findings is that Russian innovation policy is "neutral" to the size of companies, but there is a lack of instruments engaging new companies in innovation activities. The authors also discuss two possible models of government support for innovation: the former relies on international innovation spillover and the latter on domestic innovation and import-substitution.
    Keywords: industrial innovation; research and development; innovation policy
    JEL: O38 O31
    Date: 2012–09–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:41284&r=cse
  12. By: Jože Damijan; Stefanie A. Haller; Ville Kaitila; Mika Maliranta; Emmanuel Milet; Matija Rojec; Daniel Mirza
    Abstract: We analyse common stylized facts of services firms engaged in trade in a comparative study across four EU member countries. We find that, though relatively less engaged in trade than manufacturing firms, services firms have similar traits. Services firms are more likely to import than to export. Their prevalent type of trade is trade in goods. The complexity of trade activities is increasing in firm size and productivity. Two-way traders outperform one-way traders. Services are more likely to be traded by firms already engaged in trade of goods. Changes in trading status by either adding another dimension of trade (imports, exports) or another type of product (goods, services) are infrequent and are associated with significant pre-switching premia. In contrast, learning effects from switching trading status are uncommon. This evidence points to significant fixed cost of being engaged in trade. Thus, the literature on heterogeneous firms is able to explain the sorting of firms into trading and non-trading firms in the services sectors as well.
    Keywords: services sectors, exports, imports, trade in goods and services, trade premia
    JEL: F14 F19 F23
    Date: 2012–09–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rif:dpaper:1284&r=cse
  13. By: Petar Angelov; Stephanie Rosenkranz; Hans Schenk
    Abstract: Using an event study methodology, this paper assesses the competitive effects of remedies implemented by the European Commission in 11 horizontal mergers in the ICT industry between 1990 and 2010. The estimates of merger announcement effects for both merging parties and competitors have predominantly insignificant residuals, suggesting that collusion and anti-competitive effects are not implied by the market reactions to merger announcements. Remedies, both behavioural and structural, appear to be largely ineffective in negating the competition concerns of the Commission, even if properly applied to anti-competitive mergers. Moreover, behavioural remedies appear to transfer rents from merging parties to competitors. These findings suggest that static economic models are ineffective in analysing dynamic markets, possibly as a result of inadequate market definitions.
    Keywords: Merger remedies; competition policy; industrial competitiveness; ICT; M&A; event study
    JEL: G34 L41 L43
    Date: 2012–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:use:tkiwps:1216&r=cse

This nep-cse issue is ©2012 by Joao Jose de Matos Ferreira. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.