nep-com New Economics Papers
on Industrial Competition
Issue of 2024‒09‒02
fifteen papers chosen by
Russell Pittman, United States Department of Justice


  1. Mandated data-sharing in hybrid marketplaces By Navarra, Federico; Pino, Flavio; Sandrini, Luca
  2. Concentration-Based Inference for Evaluating Horizontal Mergers By Paul S. Koh
  3. Mass customization with additive manufacturing: Blessing or curse for society? By Schwierzy, Julian; Wenzel, Tobias
  4. Who is in the driver's seat? Markups, markdowns, and profit sharing in the car industry By Hahn, Nadine
  5. Returns to Data: Evidence from Web Tracking By Hannes Ullrich; Jonas Hannane; Christian Peukert; Luis Aguiar; Tomaso Duso
  6. Industry Dynamics with Cartels: The Case of the Container Shipping Industry By Suguru Otani
  7. Circular Business Models: Product Design and Consumer Participation By Buehler, Stefan; Chen, Rachel R.; Halbheer, Daniel
  8. Production Contracts and Buyer Market Power in the U.S. Broiler Chicken Industry By Bolotova, Yuliya V.
  9. Nonparametric estimation of sponsored search auctions and impact of Ad quality on search revenue By Dongwoo Kim; Pallavi Pal
  10. Product differentiation and quality in production function estimation By Hahn, Nadine
  11. Selling Certification of Private and Market Information By Gorkem Celik; Roland Strausz
  12. Impact of Geographical Separation on Spectrum Sharing Markets By Kangle Mu; Zongyun Xie; Igor Kadota; Randall Berry
  13. Markups and Pass-through along the Supply Chains By KAWAKUBO Takafumi; SUZUKI Takafumi
  14. Monopoly Unveiled: Telecom Breakups in the US and Mexico By Fausto Hern\'andez Trillo; C. Vladimir Rodr\'iguez-Caballero; Daniel Ventosa-Santaul\`aria
  15. Market Definition: A Sensitivity Analysis By Paul S. Koh

  1. By: Navarra, Federico; Pino, Flavio; Sandrini, Luca
    Abstract: We study a hybrid marketplace where a vertically integrated platform competes with a seller in a horizontally differentiated downstream market. The platform has a data advantage and can price discriminate consumers, whereas the seller cannot. Our analysis shows that, by properly setting the per-unit transaction fee, the platform can always avoid head-to-head competition with the seller, regardless of the level of horizontal differentiation. Mandating data-sharing, which allows the seller to also price discriminate, does not seem to solve this problem and, in fact, aggravates it further, generally benefiting the platform. The seller is better off only if it is less efficient than the platform, whereas consumers are worse off. We propose that preventing the platform from adjusting the fee after the data-sharing mandate is not enough to reinstate competition in the downstream market. We then show that banning the hybrid business model and forbidding the use of data for price discrimination increase consumer surplus, even if the seller becomes a monopolist. In other words, we propose that the harm to competition comes from the platform's business model rather than from its information advantage.
    Keywords: hybrid platforms, data-sharing, vertical integration, price discrimination
    JEL: D42 L12 L41
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:zewdip:300680
  2. By: Paul S. Koh
    Abstract: Antitrust authorities routinely rely on concentration measures to evaluate the potential negative impacts of mergers. Using a first-order approximation argument with logit and CES demand, I show that the welfare effect of a merger on consumer surplus is proportional to the change in the Herfindahl-Hirschman index, where the proportionality coefficient depends on price responsiveness parameter, market size, and the distribution of merging firms' shares. This paper elucidates how HHI measures inform the market power effects of mergers.
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2407.12924
  3. By: Schwierzy, Julian; Wenzel, Tobias
    Abstract: Additive Manufacturing (AM) enables mass customization and has thereby the potential to revolutionize traditional manufacturing. In this paper, we examine how the adoption of AM affects competition and welfare in traditionally standardized product markets. Analyzing a game-theoretical model of spatial product differentiation, we find a decline in standardized product prices. In contrast, the price of customized products will exceed the price level of the initial market. These price changes are accompanied with a reduction in the number of traditional manufacturers. In terms of welfare, AM adoption increases total surplus. However, it can be detrimental for consumer surplus if the competitive advantage of AM technology is excessively large. Based on these findings, we discuss policy implications for the manufacturing industry. We recommend complementary measures of ensuring the competitive environment for firms with AM technology and subsidizing their fixed cost in order to realize benefits for both consumers and producers.
    Keywords: Technology adoption, Market structure, Welfare, Product differentiation, Industrial Additive Manufacturing
    JEL: L11 L22 L23 O33
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:zewdip:300674
  4. By: Hahn, Nadine
    Abstract: I develop a general framework for markup and markdown estimation that allows for profit sharing along value chains without making assumptions on conduct between vertically related firms. I derive the conditions under which the markup and markdown estimates relate to the firms' equilibrium bargaining weights. To account for vertical and horizontal product differentiation in the production function estimation, I include plant-level prices and employ car characteristics as demand-based quality controls. Between 2002 and 2018, the European car manufacturers' margins on their input and product markets combined were stable around 10% to 15% on average. The manufacturers' share of the margin on the input market, however, depends on the car segments in which they produce. The suppliers' share depends negatively on the variety of their product portfolio and depends positively on their relationship intensity to car manufacturers. The analysis shows that the manufacturers' bargaining weights decreased during crisis years, such as the financial crisis in 2007 or the dieselgate scandal in 2015.
    Keywords: Market Power, Markups, Markdowns, Production Approach, Car Industry, Vertical Chains
    JEL: D22 L13 L14 L62
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:zewdip:300675
  5. By: Hannes Ullrich; Jonas Hannane; Christian Peukert; Luis Aguiar; Tomaso Duso
    Abstract: Tracking online user behavior is essential for targeted advertising and is at the heart of the business model of major online platforms. We analyze tracker-specific web browsing data to show how the prediction quality of consumer profiles varies with data size and scope. We find decreasing returns to the number of observed users and tracked websites. However, prediction quality increases considerably when web browsing data can be combined with demographic data. We show that Google, Facebook, and Amazon, which can combine such data at scale via their digital ecosystems, may thus attenuate the impact of regulatory interventions such as the GDPR. In this light, even with decreasing returns to data small firms can be prevented from catching up with these large incumbents. We document that proposed data-sharing provisions may level the playing field concerning the prediction quality of consumer profiles.
    Keywords: prediction quality, web tracking, cookies, data protection, competition policy, internet regulation, GDPR
    JEL: C53 D22 D43 K21 L13 L40
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11240
  6. By: Suguru Otani
    Abstract: I investigate how explicit cartels, known as ``shipping conferences", in a global container shipping market facilitated the formation of one of the largest globally integrated markets through entry, exit, and shipbuilding investment of shipping firms. Using a novel data, I develop and construct a structural model and find that the cartels shifted shipping prices by 20-50\% and encouraged firms' entry and investment. In the counterfactual, I find that cartels would increase producer surplus while slightly decreasing consumer surplus, then may increase social welfare by encouraging firms' entry and shipbuilding investment. This would validate industry policies controlling prices and quantities in the early stage of the new industry, which may not be always harmful. Investigating hypothetical allocation rules supporting large or small firms, I find that the actual rule based on tonnage shares is the best to maximize social welfare.
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2407.15147
  7. By: Buehler, Stefan (University of St. Gallen - SEPS: Economics and Political Sciences); Chen, Rachel R. (University of California, Davis - Graduate School of Management); Halbheer, Daniel (HEC Paris)
    Abstract: This paper develops an analytical framework to study product design and consumer participation in circular business models with recycling. When making their purchase decisions, consumers account for the environmental impact of end-of-life product disposal. We show that a circular business model does not necessarily achieve the promise of zero waste, and that stronger environmental preferences may increase the corporate waste footprint through demand expansion. Introducing competition among firms does not affect the choice of recyclability but undermines the viability of a circular business model. For a profit-maximizing firm, financial incentives such as product buyback or deposit-refund schemes will not generate profit from recycling, but have an indirect and positive impact on the overall profit because they alter the firm's choice of recyclability. If consumers have heterogeneous recyclability concerns, the firm strategically distorts the recyclability offered to regular consumers downward when selling two products. Nevertheless, introducing a product line for profit can be good for the planet.
    Keywords: Recycling; pricing; circular transition; competition; eco-segmentation
    JEL: M30
    Date: 2022–12–30
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ebg:heccah:1465
  8. By: Bolotova, Yuliya V.
    Abstract: The motivations for this case study are recent developments in the U.S. broiler chicken industry involving allegations of an illegal exercise of buyer market power by the five largest broiler chicken processors in the country in the market for broiler grow-out services. This case study introduces economic, business, and legal issues related to the alleged input price-fixing cartel of the five largest broiler processors. The case study describes the broiler processors’ conduct and presents a theoretical framework that may explain market and price effects of the alleged input price-fixing cartel. In addition, the case study introduces a comprehensive analysis of a sample broiler production agreement between a broiler grower and a broiler processor with a particular attention paid to design of the payment (compensation) system included in this agreement. The teaching note provides suggested answers to discussion and analytical questions, and it also includes multiple-choice questions that can be used as in-class assignments, quizzes, and exam questions.1 This case study is suitable for a variety of undergraduate and graduate courses taught in agricultural economics and agribusiness programs and for extension and outreach audiences.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Production Economics
    Date: 2924–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344127
  9. By: Dongwoo Kim; Pallavi Pal
    Abstract: This paper presents an empirical model of sponsored search auctions where advertisers are ranked by bid and ad quality. Our model is developed under the ‘incomplete information’ setting with a general quality scoring rule. We establish nonparametric identification of the advertiser’s valuation and its distribution given observed bids and introduce novel nonparametric estimators. Using Yahoo! search auction data, we estimate value distributions and study the bidding behavior across product categories. We also conduct counterfactual analysis to evaluate the impact of different quality scoring rules on the auctioneer’s revenue. Product specific scoring rules can enhance auctioneer revenue by at most 24.3% at the expense of advertiser profit (-28.3%) and consumer welfare (-30.2%). The revenue maximizing scoring rule depends on market competitiveness.
    Date: 2024–08–12
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:azt:cemmap:16/24
  10. By: Hahn, Nadine
    Abstract: Production functions provide a mapping from the firms' input quantity and productivity to output quantity. This mapping only generates unbiased estimates if input and output quality variation within and between observation units is accounted for. I review and classify state-of-the-art methods to address quality and price variation in production function estimation. Even if inputs and outputs are observed in quantities, unobserved quality variation might bias production function estimates for industries with differentiated products. To account for quality variation, I introduce product characteristics to the estimation procedure and provide an application to the European car industry.
    Keywords: Production Functions, Product Differentiation, Quality Control Functions
    JEL: D22 D24 C38 B41 L62
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:zewdip:300673
  11. By: Gorkem Celik; Roland Strausz
    Abstract: We consider a monopolistic certifier selling certification services to a partially privately informed seller. The certifier can enable the seller to disclose her private information publicly, as well as gather additional market information about the good's quality publicly. We show that the certifier's optimal contract exhibits maximal disclosure but non-maximal information-gathering. Thus, optimal contracts eliminate private information but not market uncertainty; even though the latter would be costless, it is suboptimal as it requires excessive information rents to the seller. Thus, market inefficiencies remain due to market uncertainty but not due to private information.
    Keywords: certification, disclosure, information gathering, optimal information revelation, private information
    JEL: D82
    Date: 2024–08–09
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bdp:dpaper:0045
  12. By: Kangle Mu; Zongyun Xie; Igor Kadota; Randall Berry
    Abstract: With the increasing demand for wireless services, spectrum management agencies and service providers (SPs) are seeking more flexible mechanisms for spectrum sharing to accommodate this growth. Such mechanisms impact the market dynamics of competitive SPs. Prior market models of spectrum sharing largely focus on scenarios where competing SPs had identical coverage areas. We depart from this and consider a scenario in which two competing SPs have overlapping but distinct coverage areas. We study the resulting competition using a Cournot model. Our findings reveal that with limited shared bandwidth, SPs might avoid overlapping areas to prevent potential losses due to interference. Sometimes SPs can strategically cooperate by agreeing not to provide service in the overlapping areas and, surprisingly, customers might also benefit from such cooperation under certain circumstances. Overall, market outcomes exhibit complex behaviors that are influenced by the sizes of coverage areas and the bandwidth of the shared spectrum.
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2407.20909
  13. By: KAWAKUBO Takafumi; SUZUKI Takafumi
    Abstract: The rising trend in markups documented in the United States and many other countries posed concerns in recent decades. This paper estimates firm-level markups using Japanese data during 2000--2021. First, we find that the markups overall have barely changed in the past 20 years. However, when we restrict the sample to the manufacturing sector, the markups decreased between 2000 and 2009 and increased between 2010 and 2021. There appears to be little change over the period of COVID-19. Second, we additionally exploit firm-level buyer-supplier linkage information to study the relationship between buyer and supplier markups. Our findings show that there is positive and significant correlation between markups of firms on both sides of the transactions. This result suggests the potential pass-through of prices along the supply chains.
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:eti:dpaper:24068
  14. By: Fausto Hern\'andez Trillo; C. Vladimir Rodr\'iguez-Caballero; Daniel Ventosa-Santaul\`aria
    Abstract: This paper posits the decline in market capitalization following a monopoly breakup serves as a means to gauge how financial markets assess market power. Our research, which employs univariate structural time series models to estimate the firm's value without the breakup and juxtapose it with actual post-divestiture values, reveals a staggering drop in AT&T's value by 65% and AMX's by 32% from their pre-breakup levels. These findings underscore the contemporary valuation of monopoly rents as perceived by financial markets, highlighting the significant impact of monopoly breakup on market capitalization and the need for a deeper understanding of these dynamics.
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2407.09695
  15. By: Paul S. Koh
    Abstract: Market definition holds significant importance in antitrust cases, yet achieving consensus on the correct approach remains elusive. As a result, analysts routinely entertain multiple market definitions to ensure the resilience of their conclusions. I propose a simple framework for conducting organized sensitivity analysis with respect to market definition. I model candidate market definitions as partially ordered and use a Hasse diagram, a directed acyclic graph representing a finite partial order, to summarize the sensitivity analysis. I use the Shapley value and the Shapley-Shubik power index to quantify the average marginal contribution of each firm in driving the conclusion. I illustrate the method's usefulness with an application to the Albertsons/Safeway (2015) merger.
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2407.12774

This nep-com issue is ©2024 by Russell Pittman. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.