nep-com New Economics Papers
on Industrial Competition
Issue of 2012‒07‒23
thirteen papers chosen by
Russell Pittman
US Department of Justice

  1. On the Price Effects of Horizontal Mergers : A Theoretical Interpretation By Emilie Dargaud; Carlo Reggiani
  2. The Theory of Endogenous Market Structures: A Survey By Federico Etro
  3. Endogenous Market Structures and Welfare By Federico Etro
  4. Market Thickness, Prices and Honesty: A Quality Demand Trap By Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay
  5. What drives fraud in a credence goods market? - Evidence from a field experiment By Alexander Rasch; Christian Waibel
  6. Mergers, concurrent marketing mechanisms and the performance of sequential auctions By Jeddy, Mohamed; Larue, Bruno
  7. Cooperative Markets for Ideas: When does Technology Licensing Combine with R&D Partnerships? By Giulia Trombini; Anna Comacchio
  8. Does Merger Simulation Work? A "Natural Experiment" in the Swedish Analgesics Market Market By Björnerstedt, Jonas; Verboven, Frank
  9. Competition between Managed Care Organizations and Indemnity Plans in Health Insurance Markets By Edmond Baranes; David Bardey
  10. Newspaper and Internet Display Advertising – Co-Existence or Substitution? By Nadine Lindstädt; Oliver Budzinski
  11. Power market structure and performance By Vagliasindi, Maria
  12. The Impact of Market Power at Bank Level in Risk-taking: the Brazilian case By Benjamin Miranda Tabak; Guilherme Maia Rodrigues Gomes; Maurício da Silva Medeiros Júnior
  13. ESTIMATING MARKET POWER BY RETAILERS IN A DYNAMIC FRAMEWORK: THE CASE OF THE ITALIAN PDO CHEESE MARKET By Sckokai, Paolo; Soregaroli, Claudio; Moro, Daniele

  1. By: Emilie Dargaud (GATE Lyon Saint-Etienne - Groupe d'analyse et de théorie économique - CNRS : UMR5824 - Université Lumière - Lyon II - École Normale Supérieure - Lyon); Carlo Reggiani (School of Social Sciences - University of Manchester)
    Abstract: Horizontal mergers are usually under the scrutiny of antitrust authorities due to their potential undesirable effects on prices and consumer surplus. Ex-post evidence, however, suggests that not always these effects take place and even relevant mergers may end up having negligible price effects. The analysis of mergers in the context of non-localized spatial competition may offer a further interpretation to the ones proposed in the literature : in this framework both positive and zero price effects are possible outcomes of the merger activity.
    Keywords: horizontal mergers; price effects; spokes model
    Date: 2012–07–13
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00717467&r=com
  2. By: Federico Etro (Department of Economics, University Of Venice Cà Foscari)
    Abstract: Most market structures are neither perfectly or monopolistically competitive: they are characterized by a small number of large firms engaged in strategic interactions in their production and investment decisions. Yet, most of our economic theories are still based on a simplified world where firms are either small price takers producing under constant returns to scale (perfect competition) or isolated price setters (monopolistic competition). The theory of EMSs analyzes markets in partial and general equilibrium where strategies affect entry and entry affects strategies, and only exogenous primitive conditions on technology and preferences affect the equilibrium outcome. Understanding market structures means to understand how many firms are active in a market, which strategies they adopt and how primitive conditions and policy shocks affect them in a static or dynamic perspective.
    Keywords: Endogenous entry, oligopoly, sunk costs, general equilibrium
    JEL: L1 E20 E32 F12
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ven:wpaper:2012_11&r=com
  3. By: Federico Etro (Department of Economics, University Of Venice Cà Foscari)
    Abstract: I characterize microfounded endogenous market structures with Bertrand and Cournot competition and perform welfare analysis generalizing the Mankiw-Whinston condition for excess entry. The impact of market leaders on welfare is reconsidered, with a number of policy implications about strategic investments, vertical contracts, bundling, mergers and more. The neutrality of consumer surplus holds only when utility is homothetic. Under quantity competition, aggressive (accommodating) leaders increase consumer surplus if the elasticity of utility is decreasing (increasing) in consumption. This provides general rules to evaluate mergers and abuse of dominance issues in antitrust policy.
    Keywords: Endogenous entry, oligopoly, welfare
    JEL: L1
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ven:wpaper:<2012_12&r=com
  4. By: Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay
    Abstract: We analyze how product quality, prices and demand interact in a dynamic model of asymmetric information. We show that in markets for experience goods, even in the absence of certification, trade may occur, arising from a relation between market thickness and the incentive of sellers to produce high quality. We characterize the equilibrium prices, which depend on the distribution of buyer valuations. Finally, we show that the relationship between market thickness and incentive to produce high quality goods exists up to a certain threshold level of demand.
    Keywords: Market Thickness, Endogenous Quality, Multiple Equilibria, Price Mechanism
    JEL: L14 L15 O12 O17
    Date: 2012–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bir:birmec:12-06&r=com
  5. By: Alexander Rasch (University of Cologne); Christian Waibel (CGS, University of Cologne)
    Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of four key economic variables on an expert firm's incentive to defraud its customers in a credence goods market: the level of competition, the expert firm's financial situation, its competence, and its reputational concerns. We use and complement the dataset of a nationwide field experiment conducted by the German Automobile Association that regularly checks the reliability of garages in Germany. We find that more intense competition and high competence lower firms' incentive to overcharge. A low concern for reputation and a critical financial situation increase the incentive to overcharge.
    Keywords: Asymmetric information, Auto repair market, Credence goods, Expert, Fraud, Overcharging
    JEL: D82 L15
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cgr:cgsser:03-07&r=com
  6. By: Jeddy, Mohamed; Larue, Bruno
    Abstract: We analyze the effects of mergers and the introduction of concurrent marketing mechanisms on the seller’s revenue, price trend and efficiency in sequential auctions under complete information with asymmetric bidders. First, we provide conditions for bidders to be strategic when the number of objects is less or greater than the number of bidders as this impacts upon the set of possible mergers. Second, we show that mergers may simultaneously increase the seller’s revenue and improve efficiency. Third, we show that having a marketing mechanism working alongside the auction can increase or decrease the average auction price. We use weekly data about Quebec’s daily hog auction to ascertain the effects of a merger and of changes in the weights of concurrent marketing mechanisms on daily auction prices. Our empirical analysis relies on an endogenous structural change test which detected three breaks corresponding to: i) the introduction of a new concurrent mechanism, ii) a joint-venture partnership of the two largest hog processing firms and iii) an announcement by Canada’s Competition Bureau authorizing the full merger of the same two firms.
    Keywords: Multi-unit sequential auctions, mergers, concurrent marketing mechanisms, endogenous structural changes, Industrial Organization, Institutional and Behavioral Economics, Livestock Production/Industries, D4, L7,
    Date: 2012–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:spaawp:126945&r=com
  7. By: Giulia Trombini (Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia); Anna Comacchio (Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)
    Abstract: The study departs from the traditional view of licensing as a spot market transaction and investigates license integration with R&D partnerships, introducing the concept of licensing combination. Drawing on licensing and R&D partnership literature and adopting the Òtransactional valueÓ approach, we propose two types of antecedents Ð knowledge and dyad features Ð to investigate licensing combination. Using a dataset combining 441 original license agreements with firmsÕ patenting and market activity in the global biopharmaceutical industry, we find a substantial heterogeneity in the ways licensors and licensees jointly exploit markets for knowledge and the specific role of R&D collaboration and minority equity in inter-organizational exchange through licensing. Results show that licensing combination with R&D collaboration is likely when the licensed innovation is embryonic, the licensee is unfamiliar with the licensorÕs technology and partners have different technological backgrounds. Instead, licensing of highly specific knowledge is likely to be supported by minority equity participation on the part of the licensee. Finally, licensing is combined with both forms of partnership in case of competence distance between partners. In the light of the empirical results, four types of licensing combination are proposed for future research.
    Keywords: Markets for technology, Licensing combination, R&D collaboration, Minority equity participation, Knowledge transfer, Joint value
    JEL: O32
    Date: 2012–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:vnm:wpdman:21&r=com
  8. By: Björnerstedt, Jonas; Verboven, Frank
    Abstract: We exploit a natural experiment associated with a large merger in the Swedish market for analgesics (painkillers). We confront the predictions from a merger simulation study, as conducted during the investigation, with the actual merger effects over a two-year comparison window. The merger simulation model is based on a constant expenditures specification for the nested logit model (as an alternative to the typical unit demand specification). The model predicts a large price increase of 34% by the merging firms, because there is strong market segmentation and the merging firms are the only competitors in the largest segment. The actual price increase after the merger is of a similar order of magnitude: +42% in absolute terms and +35% relative to the
    Keywords: analgesics; constant expenditures nested logit; ex post merger analysis; merger simulation
    JEL: L40 L41
    Date: 2012–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:9027&r=com
  9. By: Edmond Baranes; David Bardey
    Abstract: This paper examines a model of competition between two types of health insurers: Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) and “Conventional Insurers”. MCOs vertically integrate health care providers and pay them at a competitive price, while conventional insurers work as indemnity plans and pay the health care providers that are freely chosen by their policyholders at a wholesale price. This first difference is called input price effect. Moreover, we assume that policyholders put a positive value on providers. diversity supplied by their health insurance plan and that this value increases with their probability of disease. Due to the restricted choice of health care providers in MCOs, a risk segmentation occurs: policyholders who choose conventional insurers are characterized by a higher risk. Surprisingly, our results point out that the effects of this input price and risk segmentation can be countervailing and do not necessarily work in the same direction. More precisely, we show that vertical integration in health insurance markets can create an anti-raise rivals’ cost effect. Consequently, our results reveal that the penetration of vertical integration may decrease conventional insurers’ premiums, which is a sufficient condition to be Pareto-improving. After more than three decades of vertical integration waves, our model may also explain why we observe an interior equilibrium in which conventional insurers have survived.
    Date: 2012–07–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:col:000089:009802&r=com
  10. By: Nadine Lindstädt (Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark); Oliver Budzinski (Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark)
    Abstract: Newspapers have been experiencing declining circulation figures and diminishing advertising revenues for several years – both effects might pose a threat to the continuing existence of (print) newspapers. In an earlier paper, Lindstädt & Budzinski (2011) argued from a theoretical viewpoint that industry-specific patterns exist that determine substitution or complementation effects between internet and newspaper advertising. It was argued that retail advertising, in particular, may offer a niche for regional/local newspapers that can be expected to present a sustainable segment of complementarity along with the otherwise mostly substitutional advertising markets. This paper empirically tests these hypotheses by analyzing advertising spending data for newspaper and internet display advertising of 13 different industries in the U.S. from 2001-2010. We find evidence for some of the hypotheses. Whereas some industries showed clear substitution effects between internet display and newspaper advertising, the majority of our hypotheses could be only partly rejected: newspaper substi-tution effects could be observed, however, in the direction to traditional media platforms instead of internet display advertising. For two retail-sub-industries, the hypotheses could not be rejected for the analyzed period. The authors would like to thank the College of Communications at the Pennsylvania State University and in particular Anne Hoag and Dennis Davis for hosting Nadine Lindstädt as a Research Visiting Scholar in 2010/2011 which made it possible to access and use the Kantar Media Intelligence Ad$pender™ database for this research.
    Keywords: : media economics, advertising, complementation, substitution, newspapers, internet
    JEL: L82 A20 L13 M21
    Date: 2012–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sdk:wpaper:114&r=com
  11. By: Vagliasindi, Maria
    Abstract: Unbundling power generation, transmission, and distribution is not an end itself, but rather a means to achieve better performance. The key objective of the analytical framework of this paper is to explore the links between alternative market structures and performance (in terms of access, price, quality, and technical and financial performance). The results are crucial for providing policy advice, by offering alternative options to policy makers based on the lessons learned from the taxonomy of different market structures, tailored to different national contexts. The analysis is based on unique data, including a panel of 22 countries for the period beginning in 1989 and extending through 2009. The results of the analysis carried out for this study confirm the following conclusions for policy guidance on power market restructuring for developing countries. First, unbundling delivers results in terms of several performance indicators when used as an entry point to implement broader reforms, particularly introducing a sound regulatory framework, reducing the degree of concentration of the generation and distribution segments of the market by attracting public and private players and private sector participation. Second, there seems to be a credible empirical basis for selecting a threshold power system size and per capita income level below which unbundling of the power supply chain is not expected to be worthwhile. Finally, partial forms of vertical unbundling do not appear to drive improvements, probably because the owner was able to continue exercising control over the affairs of the sector and hinder the development of competitive pressure within the power market.
    Date: 2012–07–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:6123&r=com
  12. By: Benjamin Miranda Tabak; Guilherme Maia Rodrigues Gomes; Maurício da Silva Medeiros Júnior
    Abstract: This paper aims to examine the competitive behavior of Brazilian banking industry and through a more individual analysis understand how risk-taking can be affected by banks' market power. Therefore, we compute market power at the bank-level and aggregate this variable in a risk-taking model. Our findings suggest that Brazilian banking industry presents a significant heterogeneity of banks' market power and is characterized as monopolistic competition. Another important result is that market power is positively related to risk-taking. We also verify that banks' capitalization has an important influence in market power, which affects risk-taking. An increase in capital leads banks with higher market power to assume less risk. We verify that an increase in capital makes banks with higher market power behave more conservative. These results are important for the design of proper financial regulation.
    Date: 2012–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bcb:wpaper:283&r=com
  13. By: Sckokai, Paolo; Soregaroli, Claudio; Moro, Daniele
    Keywords: Demand and Price Analysis,
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iaae12:126703&r=com

This nep-com issue is ©2012 by Russell Pittman. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.