nep-cna New Economics Papers
on China
Issue of 2013‒03‒30
two papers chosen by
Zheng Fang
Ohio State University

  1. China's Tax-for-Fee Reform and Village Inequality By James Alm; Yongzheng Liu
  2. Spatial Price Differences and Inequality in China: Housing Market Evidence By Chao Li; John Gibson

  1. By: James Alm (Department of Economics, Tulane University); Yongzheng Liu (Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University)
    Abstract: In the late 1990s, China enacted a rural tax reform known as the "Tax-for-Fee Reform" (TFR), largely driven by a desire to address farmers' complaints about their perception of a heavy and regressive tax burden. This paper examines the impact of the TFR on inequality in rural villages in China. Our results suggest an effective role of the TFR in reducing inequality within villages. Its impact on a consumption-based measure of inequality took effect immediately; its impact on per capita household income inequality took somewhat longer. Our results also suggest that it is "rich" and/or "coastal" villages that exhibited a significant reduction of inequality from the TFR, while "poor" and/or "inland" villages experienced no significant changes in inequality from the reform.
    Keywords: tax-for-fee reform, inequality, rural China
    JEL: H7 I2 I3 O1 O5 P3
    Date: 2013–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tul:wpaper:1304&r=cna
  2. By: Chao Li (University of Waikato); John Gibson (University of Waikato)
    Abstract: The large literature on regional inequality in China is hampered by incomplete evidence on price dispersion across space, making it hard to distinguish real and nominal inequality. The two main methods used to calculate spatial deflators have been to price a national basket of goods and services across China’s different regions or else to estimate a food Engel curve and define the deflator as that needed for nominally similar households to have the same food budget shares in all regions. Neither approach is convincing with the data available in China. Moreover, a focus on tradable goods like food may be misplaced because of the emerging literature on the rapid convergence of traded goods prices within China that contrasts with earlier claims of fragmented internal markets. In a setting where traded goods prices converge rapidly, the main source of price dispersion across space should come from non-traded items, and especially from housing given the fixity of land. In this paper we use newly available data on dwelling sales in urban China to develop spatially-disaggregated indices of house prices, which are then used as spatial deflators for both provinces and core urban districts. These new deflators complement existing approaches that have relied more on traded goods prices, and are used to re-examine the evidence on the level of regional inequality. Around one-quarter of the apparent spatial inequality disappears once account is taken of cost-of-living differences.
    Keywords: housing; inequality; prices; spatial; China
    JEL: E31 O15 R31
    Date: 2013–03–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wai:econwp:13/06&r=cna

This nep-cna issue is ©2013 by Zheng Fang. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.