nep-cis New Economics Papers
on Confederation of Independent States
Issue of 2011‒06‒11
two papers chosen by
Koen Schoors
Ghent University

  1. Executive Board: The Russian Experience By Iwasaki, Ichiro
  2. After ten years the Russian crisis how IMF intervention might be evaluated? By Sulimierska, Malgorzata

  1. By: Iwasaki, Ichiro
    Abstract: In this paper, using a unique dataset of joint-stock companies, we empirically examine the determinants of the choice and size of the collective executive board, a core element of the multi-tier board system of Russian firms. Our empirical evidence strongly suggests that the need of company executives for a collective management system is a key driver for the formation of a collective executive board, while outside investors are generally indifferent toward its adoption as a means to strengthening the monitoring and control functions over top management. We also found that Russian firms in the pursuit of the internationalization of their business activities tend to avoid the establishment of a collective executive board, which is a diverse corporate organ from the viewpoint of the international standard of corporate governance systems.
    Keywords: executive board, multi-tier board system, corporate governance, strategic management, Russia
    JEL: G34 K22 L22 P31 P34
    Date: 2011–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hit:rrcwps:32&r=cis
  2. By: Sulimierska, Malgorzata
    Abstract: The ongoing global financial crisis has become prominently visible since September 2008. This crisis affected the whole world and enhanced the importance of policy implementation to mitigate financial crises in future. Many academics blamed insufficient domestic regulation as the reason of crises, others pointed to the lack of overseas financial regulation and inappropriate actions by international organizations, such as the IMF and World Bank. This whole discussion encouraged to look back and analyzed a previous crisis in smallest countries such as Russia. This paper evidently shows the inefficiency of IMF policy during the Russia Crisis in 1998 by implementing a new monetary balance-of-payment model in Russian data. This model identified the role of macroeconomic fundamentals and international economic policy implications on the likelihood and the timing of the currency crisis in Russia. For the period from December 1995 to December 1998 it was found that, the increase in domestic credit growth gradually undermined confidence in the fixed exchange rate regime. The most dangerous point was at the end of 1998, when the collapse probability was above 90 percent. This result ambiguously questioned the IMF’s July packet 1998 and proved the political aspects of this financial help.
    Keywords: currency crisis; financial liberalization; sudden-stops; monetary balance-of-payment model; Russian crisis; IMF’s policy
    JEL: F40 E58 E40
    Date: 2011–04–29
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:30930&r=cis

This nep-cis issue is ©2011 by Koen Schoors. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.