nep-cis New Economics Papers
on Confederation of Independent States
Issue of 2010‒05‒08
two papers chosen by
Koen Schoors
Ghent University

  1. Transition, Structural Divergence,and Performance: Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union over 2000-2007 By Cornia, Giovanni Andrea
  2. State Aid for Industrial Enterprises in Belarus: Remedy or Poison? By Kolesnikova, Irina

  1. By: Cornia, Giovanni Andrea
    Abstract: During the socialist era the communist regime attempted to reduce development differentials among states and social classes. In contrast, during the last 20 years, the economies in transition experienced considerable divergence in the economic, social, demographic and political areas. As a result, these countries can now be grouped into four structurally different clusters alternatively dependent on manufactured exports, high- and low-tech services, commodities exports, and migrant remittances. Between 2000 and 2007, the cluster with the fastest growth was not that which most reformed its economy and institutions, but that of commodity exporters where, however, life expectancy improved far less than in other clusters.
    Keywords: structural transformation, divergence, performance, country clusters
    Date: 2010
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp2010-32&r=cis
  2. By: Kolesnikova, Irina
    Abstract: In this paper the impact of various types of state aid on aggregate productivity growth in Belarusian manufacturing is investigated by combining the data on government support with firm-level accounting data for period 1998-2007. Obtained results indicate that the state aid provided for restructuring truly leads to the modernization of the enterprises (capital-to-labor ratio grows), that this modernization leads to an increase in effectiveness (TFP grows, especially at large enterprises), and that this growth of TFP allows the newly restructured enterprises to raise their market share which results in the growth of the allocative efficiency. However, when the state aid is provided to support enterprises in financial distress, while it leads to an increase in employment (only for enterprises receiving aid, especially for large enterprises, but not for the total sample) and to an expansion in the market share of large enterprises (not small and medium size), this achievement comes at the expense of the decrease in TFP.
    Keywords: State aid; total factor productivity; allocative efficiency; Arellano-Bond method.
    JEL: C13 O25 O49 C33 L53
    Date: 2010–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:22403&r=cis

This nep-cis issue is ©2010 by Koen Schoors. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.