| By: | J. David Brown (Heriot-Watt University, CEU Labor Project, IZA); 
John S. Earle (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research and CEU Labor Project); 
Vladimir Gimpelson (Author-Workplace-Name:); 
Rostislav Kapeliushnikov (CLMS, Higher School of Economics); 
Hartmut Lehmann (University of Bologna; Heriot-Watt University, Labor Group EROC,Kiev School of Economics, IZA); 
Almos Telegdy (CEU Labor Project, Institute of Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences); 
Irina Vantu (CEU Labor Project); 
Ruxandra Visan (CEU Labor Project); 
Alexandru Voicu (City University of New York, Staten Island College, IZA) | 
| Abstract: | This paper looks behind the standard, publicly available labor force 
statistics relied upon in most studies of transition economy labor markets. We 
analyze microdata on detailed labor force survey responses in Russia, Romania, 
and Estonia to measure nonstandard, boundary forms and alternative definitions 
of employment and unemployment. Our calculations show that measured rates are 
quite sensitive to definition, particularly in the treatment of household 
production (subsistence agriculture), unpaid family helpers, and discouraged 
workers, while the categories of part-time work and other forms of marginal 
attachment are still relatively unimportant. We find that tweaking the 
official definitions in apparently minor ways can produce alternative 
employment rates that are sharply higher in Russia but much lower in Romania 
and slightly lower in Estonia, and alternative unemployment rates that are 
sharply higher in Romania and moderately higher in Estonia and Russia. | 
| Keywords: | nonstandard, work, data, unemployment, Estonia, Russia, Romania | 
| JEL: | J21 | 
| Date: | 2006–06 | 
| URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:upj:weupjo:06-127&r=cis |