By: |
J. David Brown (Heriot-Watt University, CEU Labor Project, IZA);
John S. Earle (W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research and CEU Labor Project);
Vladimir Gimpelson (Author-Workplace-Name:);
Rostislav Kapeliushnikov (CLMS, Higher School of Economics);
Hartmut Lehmann (University of Bologna; Heriot-Watt University, Labor Group EROC,Kiev School of Economics, IZA);
Almos Telegdy (CEU Labor Project, Institute of Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences);
Irina Vantu (CEU Labor Project);
Ruxandra Visan (CEU Labor Project);
Alexandru Voicu (City University of New York, Staten Island College, IZA) |
Abstract: |
This paper looks behind the standard, publicly available labor force
statistics relied upon in most studies of transition economy labor markets. We
analyze microdata on detailed labor force survey responses in Russia, Romania,
and Estonia to measure nonstandard, boundary forms and alternative definitions
of employment and unemployment. Our calculations show that measured rates are
quite sensitive to definition, particularly in the treatment of household
production (subsistence agriculture), unpaid family helpers, and discouraged
workers, while the categories of part-time work and other forms of marginal
attachment are still relatively unimportant. We find that tweaking the
official definitions in apparently minor ways can produce alternative
employment rates that are sharply higher in Russia but much lower in Romania
and slightly lower in Estonia, and alternative unemployment rates that are
sharply higher in Romania and moderately higher in Estonia and Russia. |
Keywords: |
nonstandard, work, data, unemployment, Estonia, Russia, Romania |
JEL: |
J21 |
Date: |
2006–06 |
URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:upj:weupjo:06-127&r=cis |