nep-cfn New Economics Papers
on Corporate Finance
Issue of 2010‒03‒06
five papers chosen by
Zelia Serrasqueiro
University of the Beira Interior

  1. Tests of Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Theories of Collateral Using Private and Public Information By Berger, A.N.; Frame, W.S.; Ioannidou, V.
  2. Business and financial method patents, innovation, and policy By Hall, Bronwyn H.
  3. The Financing of R&D and Innovation By Hall, Bronwyn H.; Lerner, Josh
  4. What lures cross-border venture capital inflows? By Schertler , Andrea; Tykvová, Tereza
  5. Corporate governance and current regulation in the German banking sector: an overview and assessment By Köhler, Matthias

  1. By: Berger, A.N.; Frame, W.S.; Ioannidou, V. (Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research)
    Abstract: Collateral is a widely used, but not well understood, debt contracting feature. Two broad strands of theoretical literature explain collateral as arising from the existence of either ex ante private information or ex post incentive problems between borrowers and lenders. However, the extant empirical literature has been unable to isolate each of these effects. This paper attempts to do so using a credit registry that is unique in that it allows the researcher to have access to some private information about borrower risk that is unobserved by the lender. The data also includes public information about borrower risk, loan contract terms, and ex post performance for both secured and unsecured loans. The results suggest that the ex post theories of collateral are empirically dominant, although the ex ante theories are also valid for customers with short borrower-lender relationships that are relatively unknown to the lender.
    Keywords: Collateral;Asymmetric Information;Banks
    JEL: G21 D82 G38
    Date: 2010
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:kubcen:201013&r=cfn
  2. By: Hall, Bronwyn H. (UNU-MERIT, Maastricht University, Institute of Fiscal Studies, University of California-Berkeley, and NBER)
    Abstract: Two court decisions in the 1990s are widely viewed as having opened the door to a flood of business method and financial patents at the US Patent and Trademark Office, and to have also impacted other patent offices around the world. A number of scholars, both legal and economic, have critiqued both the quality of these patents and the decisions themselves. This paper reviews the history of business method and financial patents briefly and then explores what economists know about the relationship between the patent system and innovation, in order to draw some tentative conclusions about their likely impact. It concludes by finding some consensus in the literature about the problems associated with this particular expansion of patentable subject matter, highlighting the remaining areas of disagreement, and reviewing the various policy recommendations.
    Keywords: intellectual property, State Street, software, internet, business methods, patents, innovation
    JEL: G28 K2 L86 O34
    Date: 2010
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:unumer:2010010&r=cfn
  3. By: Hall, Bronwyn H. (UNU-MERIT, Maastricht University, Institute of Fiscal Studies, University of California-Berkeley, and NBER); Lerner, Josh (Harvard Business School, and NBER)
    Abstract: Evidence on the "funding gap" for investment innovation is surveyed. The focus is on financial market reasons for underinvestment that exist even when externality-induced underinvestment is absent. We conclude that while small and new innovative firms experience high costs of capital that are only partly mitigated by the presence of venture capital, the evidence for high costs of R&D capital for large firms is mixed. Neverthless, large established firms do appear to prefer internal funds for financing such investments and they manage their cash flow to ensure this. Evidence shows that there are limits to venture capital as a solution to the funding gap, especially in countries where public equity markets for VC exit are not highly developed. We conclude by suggesting areas for further research.
    Keywords: innovation, R&D, financing, liquidity constraints, venture capital, cash flow
    JEL: G24 G32 O32 O38
    Date: 2010
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:unumer:2010012&r=cfn
  4. By: Schertler , Andrea; Tykvová, Tereza
    Abstract: The change in the business model of venture capitalists from investing locally towards investing across borders started to intensify in the late 1990s. According to a dataset of European and North-American countries, we find that countries with higher expected growth and higher lagged stock market returns receive larger net cross-border venture capital inflows. Thus, portfolio companies located in high-growth and high-return countries receive more venture capital from foreign venture capitalists than these countries’ venture capitalists invest in foreign portfolio companies. Also, countries with lower stock market capitalizations as well as those with poor tax and legal environments for venture capital intermediation exhibit larger net cross-border inflows. These findings offer important insights for policy makers since cross-border venture capital inflows partly compensate for potential limits in the domestic venture capital supply. --
    Keywords: Venture Capital,Internationalization,Net Cross-Border Inflows,Economic Determinants
    JEL: F21 G24
    Date: 2010
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:zewdip:10001&r=cfn
  5. By: Köhler, Matthias
    Abstract: This paper gives an overview over corporate governance and banking regulation in Germany. Particular attention is put on legal and regulatory changes that were made in response to the financial market crisis. The paper shows that the changes mainly focus on the remuneration of managers and on further professionalizing the supervisory board. Problematic is that several laws that were enacted in the past years to improve corporate governance focus on listed firms. Furthermore, some of the recommendations and suggestions made to improve corporate governance in Germany are not legally binding even for stock corporations. Recent empirical evidence, moreover, suggests that bank shareholders pushed for greater risk-taking and not managers. This contrast with public view that the bank managers are pushed by aggressive remunerations schemes to increase risk-taking and indicates that the recent legal and regulatory changes fail to remove all weaknesses of the German corporate governance system. --
    Keywords: Corporate governance,banks,regulation,remuneration schemes,supervisory board
    JEL: G21 G34 G38
    Date: 2010
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:zewdip:10002&r=cfn

This nep-cfn issue is ©2010 by Zelia Serrasqueiro. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.