nep-cfn New Economics Papers
on Corporate Finance
Issue of 2009‒07‒17
three papers chosen by
Zelia Serrasqueiro
University of the Beira Interior

  1. FINANCE AND INEQUALITY: THE CASE OF INDIA By James Ang
  2. Asset Liability Management for Banks By Giandomenico, Rossano
  3. CDOs and Systematic Risk: Why bond ratings are inadequate By Jan Pieter Krahnen; Christian Wilde

  1. By: James Ang
    Abstract: Although theory emphasizes the role of financial market frictions in explaining income inequality, there is little empirical research exploring how financial development and financial sector reforms influence the evolution of income inequality. This paper examines how finance impacts on income inequality in India using annual time series data for over half a century. The results indicate that while financial development helps reduce income inequality, financial liberalization seems to have exacerbated income inequality in India. Our results are robust to the use of different measures for financial development and financial liberalization.
    Keywords: Financial development; financial liberalization, income inequality; India.
    JEL: G28 O16 O53
    Date: 2009–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mos:moswps:2008-08&r=cfn
  2. By: Giandomenico, Rossano
    Abstract: The model, by using a contingent claim approach, determines the fair value of the banks liabilities accounting for the protection and the surrender possibility. Furthermore, it determines the implied duration of banks liabilities so to show that the surrender possibility will reduce the effective duration of banks liabilities. Implications for the immunization are also treated.
    Keywords: Contingent Claim; Duration
    JEL: G13 G21
    Date: 2008–07–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:15757&r=cfn
  3. By: Jan Pieter Krahnen (Goethe University Frankfurt, CFS, and CEPR); Christian Wilde (Goethe University Frankfurt)
    Abstract: This paper analyzes the risk properties of typical asset-backed securities (ABS), like CDOs or MBS, relying on a model with both macroeconomic and idiosyncratic components. The examined properties include expected loss, loss given default, and macro factor dependencies. Using a two-dimensional loss decomposition as a new metric, the risk properties of individual ABS tranches can directly be compared to those of corporate bonds, within and across rating classes. By applying Monte Carlo Simulation, we find that the risk properties of ABS differ significantly and systematically from those of straight bonds with the same rating. In particular, loss given default, the sensitivities to macroeconomic risk, and model risk differ greatly between instruments. Our findings have implications for understanding the credit crisis and for policy making. On an economic level, our analysis suggests a new explanation for the observed rating inflation in structured finance markets during the pre-crisis period 2004-2007. On a policy level, our findings call for a termination of the 'one-size-fits-all' approach to the rating methodology for fixed income instruments, requiring an own rating methodology for structured finance instruments.
    Keywords: Credit Risk, Risk Transfer, Systematic Risk
    JEL: G21 G28
    Date: 2009–06–24
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cfs:cfswop:wp200911&r=cfn

This nep-cfn issue is ©2009 by Zelia Serrasqueiro. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.