nep-cbe New Economics Papers
on Cognitive and Behavioural Economics
Issue of 2026–04–13
three papers chosen by
Marco Novarese, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale


  1. Thinking versus Doing: Cognitive Capacity, Decision Making and Medical Diagnosis By Benjamin R. Handel; Louis-Jonas Heizlsperger; Jonas Knecht; Jonathan T. Kolstad; Ulrike Malmendier; Filip Matějka
  2. Ranking Policies Under Loss Aversion and Inequality Aversion By Martyna Kobus; Radoslaw Kurek; Thomas Parker
  3. The Trust Game: A Historical and Methodological Analysis at the Frontier of Experimental and Behavioral Economics By Nicolas Camilotto

  1. By: Benjamin R. Handel; Louis-Jonas Heizlsperger; Jonas Knecht; Jonathan T. Kolstad; Ulrike Malmendier; Filip Matějka
    Abstract: We study how situational fluctuations in cognitive capacity shape behavior in high-stakes, real-time decision-making. Drawing on recent advances in behavioral economics that revolve around inattention, cognition and complexity, we show that cognitive load influences how physicians in emergency departments allocate mental effort and attention when making diagnostic and treatment decisions. We use quasi-random variation in patient-physician pairings, along with granular electronic medical record and audit-log data from many clinical interactions, to show that, under higher cognitive load, physicians substitute mental deliberation with more numerous but less precise diagnostic actions. Specifically, we document that higher load (i) increases the total number of orders of diagnostic tests (ii) reduces the use of targeted, but more uncommon tests (iii) increases the use of common tests and (iv) increases uncertainty in diagnostic beliefs. Cognitive load impacts downstream inpatient admission from the emergency department: a physician in the highest cognitive load decile increases admissions by 28% relative to the same physician in the lowest cognitive load decile, for the exact same kind of patient. These results offer novel field-based evidence on the dynamics of attention and belief formation, and shed light on how cognitive constraints shape diagnostic behavior in complex, real-world environments.
    JEL: D83 D91 I11
    Date: 2026–04
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35034
  2. By: Martyna Kobus; Radoslaw Kurek; Thomas Parker
    Keywords: Loss aversion; inequality aversion; stochastic dominance; bootstrap inference
    JEL: D04 C14
    Date: 2024–11
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cxu:wpaper:59
  3. By: Nicolas Camilotto (Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, GREDEG, France)
    Abstract: This paper provides a life-cycle analysis of the Trust Game, using its trajectory as a lens to clarify the boundaries between experimental and behavioral economics. We first trace its 1995 creation by Berg et al. as a challenge to calculative trust paradigms. A bibliometric study then maps its diffusion, revealing two divergent paths in economics: one, rooted in experimental economics, prioritizes measurement; the other, in behavioral economics, theory-testing. These paths differ in methods and validity standards, constituting an epistemic divide that illuminates the fields’ evolving relationship.
    Keywords: trust; trust game; experimental economics; behavioral economics
    JEL: B2 B4 C9
    Date: 2026–03
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gre:wpaper:2026-11

This nep-cbe issue is ©2026 by Marco Novarese. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the Griffith Business School of Griffith University in Australia.