nep-cbe New Economics Papers
on Cognitive and Behavioural Economics
Issue of 2025–04–14
three papers chosen by
Marco Novarese, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale


  1. Strategic decisions and eye tracking data By Gelden, Victoria
  2. Interpreting cynical beliefs about others By Philipp Sternal
  3. When Elinor Ostrom Meets Herbert A. Simon: The Sciences of the Artificial as a Methodological Guide "To Deal with Complexity" By Massimo Cervesato

  1. By: Gelden, Victoria
    Abstract: Recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of eye gaze. through a well-established gaze tracking method in psychology. The study of economic decision making. The purpose is to find Behavioral insights that are not basedly available Based only on observed choice data. At the same time, the opposite with expensive and complex procedures such as fMRI; Eye-tracking allows subjects to be tested under certain conditions. Standard tests showed similar conditions. Behavioral experiments.
    Date: 2023–05–24
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:osf:osfxxx:h6stv_v1
  2. By: Philipp Sternal
    Abstract: A growing number of studies suggest that individuals are cynical about others’ behavior. But these findings often rely on self-reported rather than actual behavior as benchmark. A well-documented limitation of self-reports is their tendency to overstate good behavior. I introduce a simple, portable test to assess the extent to which inattention to others’ potential misreporting drives apparently cynical beliefs about stated behavior. Drawing people’s attention to the possibility of misreporting in self-reports increases beliefs about others’ stated desirable climate and health behaviors by an average of 0.33 standard deviations, substantially reducing apparent cynicism.
    Keywords: Misperception, social desirability, attention
    JEL: C90 D83 D91
    Date: 2025–03
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zur:econwp:465
  3. By: Massimo Cervesato (Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)
    Abstract: In this paper, we aim to shed new light on the methodology that Elinor Ostrom used to study real institutional situations by analyzing the specific theoretical influences that led her to mobilize the notion of complexity. We show the hitherto neglected decisive influence on her work of the "sciences of the artificial", a term coined by the political scientist, economist and precursor of systems thinking, Herbert A. Simon. On several occasions, Ostrom described Simon's book The Sciences of the Artificial as the precursor of a new methodology upon which she relied to understand the most complex system of all: human society. We thus demonstrate that the systems-engineering approach, in particular as established by Simon, played a greater role in Ostrom's work than is usually assumed. This way, we expect to provide a more precise understanding of the notion of complexity she used and the methodological choices that resulted from it. In so doing, we also illustrate how an interdisciplinary approach based on the notion of complexity can concretely be used in institutional economics
    Keywords: Ostrom (Elinor); complexity; Economic Methodology; Simon (Herbert A.); Systems Science; Institutional Analysis
    JEL: B25 B31 B41 B52
    Date: 2025–03
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mse:cesdoc:25007

This nep-cbe issue is ©2025 by Marco Novarese. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.