nep-cba New Economics Papers
on Central Banking
Issue of 2012‒05‒29
seventeen papers chosen by
Maria Semenova
Higher School of Economics

  1. What does a monetary policy shock do? An international analysis with multiple filters By Efrem Castelnuovo
  2. Euro Area Money Demand and International Portfolio Allocation: A Contribution to Assessing Risks to Price Stability By De Santis, Roberto A; Favero, Carlo A.; Roffia, Barbara
  3. The Effect of Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy Rules on Inflation Expectations: Theory and Evidence By Farmer, Roger E A
  4. Monetary and Fiscal Policy Interactions in an Emerging Open Economy Exposed to Sudden Stops Shock: A DSGE Approach By Aliya Algozhina
  5. Monetary Policy in Emerging Markets: A Survey By Frankel, Jeffrey A.
  6. Global Banks, Financial Shocks and International Business Cycles: Evidence from an Estimated Model By Kollmann, Robert
  7. The impact of external shocks on the eurozone: a structural VAR model By Jean-Baptiste Gossé; Cyriac Guillaumin
  8. The ECB as Lender of Last Resort for Sovereigns in the Euro Area By Buiter, Willem H.; Rahbari, Ebrahim
  9. Exchange rate regimes and fiscal multipliers By Born, Benjamin; Juessen, Falko; Müller, Gernot
  10. Financial Risk Measurement for Financial Risk Management By Torben G. Andersen; Tim Bollerslev; Peter F. Christoffersen; Francis X. Diebold
  11. Assessing the impact of different nominal anchors on the credibility of stabilisation programmes By Prazmowski, Peter A.; Sánchez-Fung, José R.
  12. Contagion in financial networks: a threat index By Gabrielle Demange
  13. The Sovereign Default Puzzle: Modelling Issues and Lessons for Europe By Cohen, Daniel; Villemot, Sébastien
  14. Bank regulations and income inequality: Empirical evidence By Delis, Manthos D.; Hasan, Iftekhar; Kazakis , Pantelis
  15. The Future of Financial Markets and Regulation: What Strategy for Europe? By Jean-Baptiste Gossé; Dominique Plihon
  16. Real Exchange Rate and Economic Growth: Evidence from Chinese Provincial Data (1992 - 2008) By Jinzhao Chen
  17. Estimates of Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rates, May 2012 By William R. Cline; John Williamson

  1. By: Efrem Castelnuovo (University of Padova)
    Abstract: What does a monetary policy shock do? We answer this question by estimating a new-Keynesian monetary policy DSGE model for a number of economies with a variety of empirical proxies of the business cycle. The effects of two different policy shocks, an unexpected interest rate hike conditional on a constant inflation target and an unpredicted drift in the inflation target, are scrutinized. Filter-specific Bayesian impulse responses are contrasted with those obtained by combining multiple business cycle indicators. Our results document the substantial uncertainty surrounding the estimated effects of these two policy shocks across a number of countries.
    Keywords: Multiple filtering, business cycle proxies, new-Keynesian business cycle model, trend inflation, monetary policy shocks.
    JEL: C32 E32 E37
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pad:wpaper:0145&r=cba
  2. By: De Santis, Roberto A; Favero, Carlo A.; Roffia, Barbara
    Abstract: This paper argues that a stable broad money demand for the euro area over the period 1980-2011 can be obtained by modelling cross border international portfolio allocation. As a consequence, model-based excess liquidity measures, namely the difference between actual M3 growth (net of the inflation objective) and the expected money demand trend dynamics, can be useful to predict HICP inflation.
    Keywords: Euro area money demand; inflation forecasts; monetary policy; portfolio allocation
    JEL: E4 E44
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8957&r=cba
  3. By: Farmer, Roger E A
    Abstract: This paper has three parts. First, I provide a theoretical framework to explain how rational expectations models, where the central bank follows a conventional monetary policy rule, can be used to understand the history of interest rates and inflation in the period between 1951 and the Great Recession of 2008. Second, I use the framework developed in the first part of the paper to illustrate how the purchase of assets other than treasuries, for example, mortgage backed securities and long bonds, can influence inflation expectations when the interest rate is zero. Third, I show that the beginning of unconventional monetary policy in 2008 coincided with a significant increase in inflation expectations. I extend existing models of monetary policy by adding explicit markets for financial securities. Using this extended framework, I show that the purchase of assets, other than short term treasury bills, has a differential impact on the prices of risky securities. Unconventional monetary policy is an important tool in a central bank’s arsenal that can and should be used to help prevent deflation in the wake of a financial crisis.
    Keywords: inflation; interest rates; unconventional monetary policy; zero lower bound
    JEL: E31 E4
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8956&r=cba
  4. By: Aliya Algozhina
    Abstract: The monetary and fiscal policy interactions have gained a new research interest after the 2008 crisis due to the global increase of fiscal debt. This paper constructs a macroeconomic model of joint fiscal and monetary policy for an emerging open economy taking into account its structural uniqueness. In particular, the two instruments of monetary policy, interest rate and foreign exchange intervention; the two instruments of fiscal policy, government consumption and government investment; and a sudden stops shock through the collateral constraint of foreign borrowings are modeled here in a single DSGE framework. The parameters are calibrated for the case of Hungary using data over 1995Q1-2011Q3. The impulse response functions show that government consumption is unproductive and increases fiscal debt as opposed to government investment, foreign exchange intervention positively affects net exports but does not stimulate an economy per se causing inflation, and a negative shock to the upper bound of leverage ratio in the collateral constraint of foreign borrowings generates a sudden stops crisis for the emerging world. Monetary and fiscal policy intimately interact in the short and medium run such that there is an immediate response of monetary instruments to fiscal shocks, while fiscal instruments adjust to monetary shocks in the medium run.
    Keywords: Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, Emerging Open Economy, Sudden Stops, Collateral Constraint
    JEL: E63 F41 G01
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wsr:wpaper:y:2012:i:094&r=cba
  5. By: Frankel, Jeffrey A.
    Abstract: The characteristics that distinguish most developing countries, compared to large industrialized countries, include: greater exposure to supply shocks in general and trade volatility in particular, procyclicality of both domestic fiscal policy and international finance, lower credibility with respect to both price stability and default risk, and other imperfect institutions. These characteristics warrant appropriate models. Models of dynamic inconsistency in monetary policy and the need for central bank independence and commitment to nominal targets apply even more strongly to developing countries. But because most developing countries are price-takers on world markets, the small open economy model, with nontraded goods, is often more useful than the two-country two-good model. Contractionary effects of devaluation are also far more important for developing countries, particularly the balance sheet effects that arise from currency mismatch. The exchange rate was the favored nominal anchor for monetary policy in inflation stabilizations of the late 1980s and early 1990s. After the currency crises of 1994-2001, the conventional wisdom anointed Inflation Targeting as the preferred monetary regime in place of exchange rate targets. But events associated with the global crisis of 2007-09 have revealed limitations to the choice of CPI for the role of price index. The participation of emerging markets in global finance is a major reason why they have by now earned their own large body of research, but it also means that they remain highly prone to problems of asymmetric information, illiquidity, default risk, moral hazard and imperfect institutions. Many of the models designed to fit emerging market countries were built around such financial market imperfections; few economists thought this inappropriate. With the global crisis of 2007-09, the tables have turned: economists should now consider drawing on the models of emerging market crises to try to understand the unexpected imperfections and failures of advanced-country financial markets.
    Date: 2011
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hrv:hksfac:4669671&r=cba
  6. By: Kollmann, Robert
    Abstract: This paper estimates a two-country model with a global bank, using US and Euro Area (EA) data, and Bayesian methods. The estimated model matches key US and EA business cycle statistics. Empirically, a model version with a bank capital requirement outperforms a structure without such a constraint. A loan loss originating in one country triggers a global output reduction. Banking shocks matter more for EA macro variables than for US real activity. During the Great Recession (2007-09), banking shocks accounted for about 20% of the fall in US and EA GDP, and for more than half of the fall in EA investment and employment.
    Keywords: Bayesian econometrics; financial crisis; global banking; investment; real activity
    JEL: E44 F36 F37 G21
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8985&r=cba
  7. By: Jean-Baptiste Gossé (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - Université Paris XIII - Paris Nord - CNRS : UMR7234); Cyriac Guillaumin (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - Université Pierre Mendès-France - Grenoble II : EA4625)
    Abstract: This paper studies the impact of the main external shocks which the eurozone and member states have undergone since the start of the 2000s. Such shocks have been monetary (drop in global interest rates), financial (two stock market crises) and real (rising oil prices and an accumulation of global current account imbalances). We have used a structural VAR (SVAR) methodology, on the basis of which we have defined four structural shocks: external, supply, demand and monetary. The estimates obtained using SVAR models enabled us to determine the impact of these shocks on the eurozone and its member countries. The study highlights the diversity of reactions inside the eurozone. The repercussions of the oil and monetary shocks were fairly similar in all eurozone countries - excepting the Netherlands and the United Kingdom - but financial crises and global imbalances have had very different effects. External shocks explain one-fifth of the growth differential and current account balance variance and about one-third of fluctuations in the real effective exchange rate in Europe. The impact of the oil crisis was particularly large, but it pushed the euro down. Global imbalances explain a large proportion of exchange rate fluctuations but drove the euro up. Furthermore the response functions to financial and monetary crises are similar, except for current account functions. A financial crisis seems to result in the withdrawal of larger volumes of assets than a monetary crisis. The study thus highlights the diversity of the reactions in the eurozone and shows that external shocks do more to explain variations in the real effective exchange rate than in the growth differential or current account, while underlining the particularly important part played by global imbalances in European exchange rate fluctuations.
    Keywords: global imbalances, current account, eurozone, structural VAR model, contemporary and long-term restrictions, external shock, exogeneity hypothesis.
    Date: 2011–06–25
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00610024&r=cba
  8. By: Buiter, Willem H.; Rahbari, Ebrahim
    Abstract: The paper establishes that sovereigns, like banks, need a lender of last resort (LoLR). In the euro area the ECB, with its estimated €3.4 trillion non-inflationary loss absorption capacity, is the only credible sovereign LoLR. The ECB/Eurosystem has been acting as sovereign LoLR through its SMP purchases of periphery sovereign debt in the secondary markets. It has also contributed, through the deeply subsidised bank funding it provided through the 3-year LTROs, half of a mechanism to purchase periphery sovereign debt in the primary issue markets. The other half has been financial repression requiring banks in Italy and Spain to purchase more of their own government’s debt than they would voluntarily and at below-market yields. We expect that, once Spain and Italy are under troika programmes, the Eurosystem will also lend to these sovereigns indirectly, through loans by the national central banks to the IMF which on-lends them to these sovereigns. We recommend that, to increase its effectiveness as LoLR, the ESM be given a banking license. To reduce the illegitimate and unaccountable abuse of the ECB/Eurosystem as a quasi-fiscal actor, we propose that all its credit risk-related losses be jointly and severally guaranteed/indemnified by the 17 euro area member states.
    Keywords: Central bank; EMU; Financial repression; Lender of Last Resort; Quasi-fiscal activities; Seigniorage
    JEL: E02 E31 E42 E43 E44 E63 G21 G28 H12
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8974&r=cba
  9. By: Born, Benjamin; Juessen, Falko; Müller, Gernot
    Abstract: Does the fiscal multiplier depend on the exchange rate regime and, if so, how strongly? To address this question, we first estimate a panel vector autoregression (VAR) model on time-series data for OECD countries. We identify the effects of unanticipated government spending shocks in countries with fixed and floating exchange rates, while controlling for anticipated changes in government spending. In a second step, we interpret the evidence through the lens of a New Keynesian small open economy model. Three results stand out. First, while government spending multipliers are larger under fixed exchange rate regimes, the difference relative to floating exchange rates is smaller than what traditional Mundell-Fleming analysis suggests. Second, there is little evidence for the specific transmission channel which is at the heart of the Mundell-Fleming model. Third, the New Keynesian model provides a satisfactory account of the evidence.
    Keywords: exchange rate regimes; fiscal multiplier; fiscal policy; monetary policy; New Keynesian model; Panel VAR
    JEL: E62 F41
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8986&r=cba
  10. By: Torben G. Andersen; Tim Bollerslev; Peter F. Christoffersen; Francis X. Diebold
    Abstract: Current practice largely follows restrictive approaches to market risk measurement, such as historical simulation or RiskMetrics. In contrast, we propose flexible methods that exploit recent developments in financial econometrics and are likely to produce more accurate risk assessments, treating both portfolio-level and asset-level analysis. Asset-level analysis is particularly challenging because the demands of real-world risk management in financial institutions – in particular, real-time risk tracking in very high-dimensional situations – impose strict limits on model complexity. Hence we stress powerful yet parsimonious models that are easily estimated. In addition, we emphasize the need for deeper understanding of the links between market risk and macroeconomic fundamentals, focusing primarily on links among equity return volatilities, real growth, and real growth volatilities. Throughout, we strive not only to deepen our scientific understanding of market risk, but also cross-fertilize the academic and practitioner communities, promoting improved market risk measurement technologies that draw on the best of both.
    JEL: C1 G1
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18084&r=cba
  11. By: Prazmowski, Peter A. (American Chamber of Commerce of the Dominican Republic); Sánchez-Fung, José R. (Kingston University)
    Abstract: The paper compares the impact of announcing exchange-rate-based versus money-based stabilisation programmes in a cross-section of countries. The analysis finds that the effect of announcing exchange-rate-based programmes is more credible, in terms of reducing inflation inertia, than the outcome associated with implementing money-based programmes. But the gap between the magnitudes of the impacts from implementing the different strategies has been falling since the 1970s.
    Keywords: Inflation stabilisation; credibility; nominal anchors; IMF programmes
    JEL: E31 E63 F41
    Date: 2012–01–17
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ris:kngedp:2012_001&r=cba
  12. By: Gabrielle Demange (PSE - Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques - CNRS : UMR8545 - Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) - Ecole des Ponts ParisTech - Ecole Normale Supérieure de Paris - ENS Paris - INRA, EEP-PSE - Ecole d'Économie de Paris - Paris School of Economics - Ecole d'Économie de Paris)
    Abstract: An intricate web of claims and obligations ties together the balance sheets of a wide variety of financial institutions. Under the occurrence of default, these interbank claims generate externalities across institutions and possibly disseminate defaults and bankruptcy. Building on a simple model for the joint determination of the repayments of interbank claims, this paper introduces a measure of the threat that a bank poses to the system. Such a measure, called threat index, may be helpful to determine how to inject cash into banks so as to increase debt reimbursement, or to assess the contributions of individual institutions to the risk in the system. Although the threat index and the default level of a bank both reflect some form of weakness and are affected by the whole liability network, the two indicators differ. As a result, injecting cash into the banks with the largest default level may not be optimal.
    Keywords: Contagion ; Systemic risk ; Financial linkages ; Bankruptcy
    Date: 2012–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00662513&r=cba
  13. By: Cohen, Daniel; Villemot, Sébastien
    Abstract: Why do countries default? This seemingly simple question has yet to be adequately answered in the literature. Indeed, prevailing modelling strategies compel the to choose between two unappealing model features: depending on the cost of default selected by the modeler, either the debt ratios are too high and the probability of default is too low or the opposite is true. In view of the historical evidence that countries always default after a crisis, we propose a novel approach to the theory of debt default and develop a model that matches the key stylized facts regarding sovereign risk.
    Keywords: Levy stochastic processes; Sovereign debt
    JEL: F34
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8971&r=cba
  14. By: Delis, Manthos D. (Faculty of Finance, Cass Business School, City University); Hasan, Iftekhar (Fordham University and Bank of Finland); Kazakis , Pantelis (Department of Economics, Ohio State University)
    Abstract: This paper provides cross-country evidence that variations in bank regulatory policies result in differences in income distribution. In particular, the overall liberalization of banking systems decreases the Gini coefficient and the Theil index significantly. However, this effect fades away for countries with low levels of economic and institutional development and for market-based economies. Among the different liberalization policies, the most significant negative effect on inequality is that of credit controls, which also seem to have a lasting effect on the Gini coefficient. Banking supervision and the abolition of interest rate controls also have a negative yet short-run impact on income inequality. A notable finding is that liberalization of securities markets increases income inequality substantially and over a long time span, suggesting that securitization widens the distribution of income. We contend that these findings have new implications for the effects of bank regulations, besides those related to their impact on financial stability.
    Keywords: bank regulations; income inequality; cross-country panel data; instrumental variables; panel VAR
    JEL: G28 O15 O16
    Date: 2012–04–20
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:bofrdp:2012_018&r=cba
  15. By: Jean-Baptiste Gossé (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - Université Paris XIII - Paris Nord - CNRS : UMR7234); Dominique Plihon (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - Université Paris XIII - Paris Nord - CNRS : UMR7234)
    Abstract: This article provides insight into the future of financial markets and regulation in order to define what would be the best strategy for Europe. To preserve financial stability, Europe has to choose between financial opening and independently determining how to regulate finance. Among the five scenarios we defined, three achieve financial stability both inside and outside Europe. In terms of market efficiency, the multi-polar scenario is the best and the fragmentation scenario is the worst, since gains of integration depend on the size of the new capital market. Regarding sovereignty of regulation, fragmentation is the best scenario and the multi-polar scenario is the worst because it necessitates coordination at the global level which implies moving further away from respective national preferences. However, the more realistic option seems to be the regionalisation scenario: (i) this level of coordination seems much more realistic than the global one; (ii) the market should be of sufficient size to enjoy substantial benefits of integration. Nevertheless, the "European government" might gradually increase the degree of financial integration outside Europe in line with the degree of cooperation with the rest of the world.
    Keywords: Financial Stability, Supervision and Regulation, Financial Integration
    Date: 2011–08–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00613251&r=cba
  16. By: Jinzhao Chen (PSE - Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques - CNRS : UMR8545 - Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) - Ecole des Ponts ParisTech - Ecole Normale Supérieure de Paris - ENS Paris - INRA, EEP-PSE - Ecole d'Économie de Paris - Paris School of Economics - Ecole d'Économie de Paris)
    Abstract: This paper studies the convergence, and the role of internal real exchange rate on economic growth in the Chinese provincial level. Using informal growth equation à la Barro [1991] and dynamic panel data estimation, we find conditional convergence among the coastal provinces and among inland provinces. Moreover, our results show that the real exchange rate appreciation has a positive effect on the provincial economic growth.
    Keywords: Real Exchange Rate ; Economic Growth ; China ; Generalized method of moments
    Date: 2012–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00667467&r=cba
  17. By: William R. Cline (Peterson Institute for International Economics); John Williamson (Peterson Institute for International Economics)
    Abstract: Cline and Williamson calculate a new set of fundamental equilibrium exchange rates (FEERs) based on the new round of International Monetary Fund (IMF) projections in the spring 2012 World Economic Outlook. These show that on a trade-weighted basis the US dollar is now overvalued by 3–4 percent, while the Chinese renminbi is undervalued 3–4 percent. Both misalignments are much lower than in previous years (6 percent overvaluation and 16 percent undervaluation respectively a year ago). Because of the large roles of China and the United States in global imbalances, the GDP-weighted absolute value of divergence from FEERs has fallen from 8.4 percent in 2009 to 2.6 percentage points in April 2012. In contrast, large imbalances and misalignments have persisted in a number of smaller economies, including Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and Turkey on the deficit side and Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, and Taiwan on the surplus side.
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb12-14&r=cba

This nep-cba issue is ©2012 by Maria Semenova. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.