nep-agr New Economics Papers
on Agricultural Economics
Issue of 2024‒08‒12
131 papers chosen by
Angelo Zago, Universitàà degli Studi di Verona
  1. Navigating Climate Impact on Farmer Decision Making: An Analysis of Irrigation Management by Southeastern US Farmers By Santhosh, Harikrishnan; Mullen, Jeffrey D.
  2. Climate-Induced Yield Changes and TFP: How Much R&D Is Necessary to Maintain the Food Supply? By Beckman, Jayson; Dong, Fengxia; Ivanic, Maros; Jägermeyr, Jonas; Villoria, Nelson
  3. Willingness to pay for pest management information: Evidence from specialty crop growers. By Amon, Kelvin; Wade, Tara; Gao, Zhifeng
  4. An Analysis of the Management Stabilization Effect of Farms with Livestock Disease Insurance: Focusing on the type and scale of Korean Beef (Hanwoo) Farms By Myeong, Su-hwan; Nam, Kyungsoo
  5. Global Prices, Local Profits: The Impacts of International Price Shocks On Agricultural Processors’ Performance By Cai, Yetian; Weng, Weizhe
  6. Co-benefits of Agricultural Diversification and Technology for Food and Nutrition Security in China By Thomas Cherico Wanger; Estelle Raveloaritiana; Siyan Zeng; Haixiu Gao; Xueqing He; Yiwen Shao; Panlong Wu; Kris A. G. Wyckhuys; Wenwu Zhou; Yi Zou; Zengrong Zhu; Ling Li; Haiyan Cen; Yunhui Liu; Shenggen Fan
  7. Adapting to High Temperatures? The Increased Use of Climate-Resilient Crop Varieties in West Africa By Kakpo, Ange T.; Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul
  8. Climate Change Impact on Bangladesh's Food Security: A trade regime switching partial equilibrium model approach. By Mobarok, Mohammad H.; Thompson, Wyatt
  9. Land regularization and technical efficiency in agricultural production: An empirical study in Andean Countries By Schling, Maja; Saenz, Magaly
  10. The Role of Food Assistance in Rural Areas By Beatty, Timothy; Ambrozek, Charlotte; Pagan, Gina
  11. The Transition Incentive Program and Women Farmers in the USA By Hartarska, Valentina M.; Adjei, Eugene; Nadolnyak, Denis A.
  12. Access to Fresh Produce: Examining the Impact of Cultural and Non-Cultural Barriers to Farmers Markets. By Posey, Sean; Grant, Jared D.
  13. What demand and supply forces determine the location of off-farm points of sale in short food supply chains: Evidence from Nord and Pas-de-Calais, France By Rawaa Laajimi; Laurence Delattre; Hubert Jayet
  14. Shadow prices of agrochemicals in the Chinese farming sector By Zhou, Jiajun; Mennig, Philipp; Sauer, Johannes
  15. Impact of cost share programs on conservation practice adoption: A new perspective By Wang, Tong; Jin, Hailong
  16. Are experts overoptimistic about the success of food market labeling information? By Melo, Grace; Palma, Marco A.; Ribera, Luis A.
  17. Resolving Trade Conflicts: Agricultural Trade and the Lifting of Retaliatory Tariffs By Morgan, Stephen N.; Padilla, Samantha
  18. The impact of Technical Assistance on adoption of agricultural practices in Brazil By De Carvalho Reis Neves, Mateus; De Figueiredo Silva, Felipe; Freitas, Carlos Otavio
  19. The Economic Impact of Farmers Markets on Property Values: Evidence from Edmonton, Canada By Zheng, Yanan; Yang, Meng; An, Henry; Qiu, Feng
  20. Valuing Feeder Calf Attributes Across Regions By Panyi, Amadeo F.; Raper, Kellie Curry; Peel, Derrell
  21. Cross-crop spillover effects of pesticide use: Modeling reduced lygus damage to California cotton By Zheng, Yanan; Goodhue, Rachael E.
  22. Demand for Farmed and Wild-caught Fish and Seafood By Okrent, Abigail M.; Zhen, Chen; Wang, Shaonan
  23. Good Neighbor or Bad Neighbor: Assessing the Impact of Concentrated Animal Feed Operations on Local Economies By Wang, Xiangrui; Kong, Xiangwen
  24. Effect of Information on Consumers’ Trade-Off Between Subjective Food Safety Cues and Certification: Insights from a Choice Experiment By Akinwehinmi, Oluwagbenga J.; Colen, Liesbeth
  25. Assessing Policies to Create a More Circular Food System By Jeong, Junyoung; Cai, Yongyang; Roe, Brian E.
  26. The impacts of economic sanctions on food (prices) security: Evidence from targeted countries By Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku; Kornher, Lukas; Santeramo, Fabio G.
  27. Pesticide Regulatory Heterogeneity, Foreign Sourcing, and Global Agricultural Value Chains By Fiankor, Dela-Dem Doe; Dalheimer, Bernhard; Mack, Gabriele
  28. U.S. Infant Formula Industry: A Qualitative Analysis of a Major Food Safety Recall and Its Implications By Sariman, Sevval Buse; Rudi Polloshka, Jeta; Caputo, Vincenzina
  29. Adaptation to Frost and Heat Risks in French Viticulture: Are Grape Growers Dumb Farmers? By Lis-Castiblanco, Catherine; Jordi, Louis
  30. Estimation of Global Crop Area Elasticities: A Bayesian Approach By Woo, Sunghwi; Thompson, Wyatt; Arita, Shawn
  31. Selection and the Additionality of Incentives for Environmental Conservation By Nguyen, Nhu; Reeling, Carson; Verdier, Valentin
  32. State-level heterogeneities in US food insecurity – an assessment of long-term predictors By Hoeschle, Lisa; Wang, Hong Holly; Yu, Xiaohua
  33. Does agricultural green innovation enhance or hinder the financial performance of agri-food enterprises in China? By Chen, Kevin; Hu, Shuang; Ji, Chen
  34. Mechanization and Farm Profit: Model and Application to Specialty Crops By Li, Yi; Huang, Kuan-Ming; Guan, Zhengfei
  35. What Drives the Market Share of Livestock Risk Protection (LRP)? An Empirical Analysis at State and County Level in Nebraska By Chauhan, Milan; Lubben, Bradley D.
  36. Annual Food Price Inflation Forecasting: A Macroeconomic Random Forest Approach By McWilliams, William N.; Isengildina Massa, Olga; Stewart, Shamar L.
  37. Heterogenous Agricultural and Food Trade Effects of Exchange Rate Volatility By Kim, Dongin; Steinbach, Sandro; Zurita, Carlos
  38. Effects of On-Farm Diversification on Farm Resilience: Evidence from Kansas By Sharma, Priyanka; Shanoyan, Aleksan; Yao, Becatien H.
  39. Evaluating The Impact of Nutritional Label Serving Size Change By Liu, Yizao; Fan, Linlin; Zhang, Yuxiang
  40. Drivers and Challenges in Pig Production Systems in Northern Uganda: Analyzing Farmers' Choices and Confronting Issues By Adewale, Caleb I.; Ndyomugyenyi, Elly K.; Mugonola, Basil
  41. The Impact of USDA Disaster Designations on Farmland Values in the US By Jayasekera, Deshamithra H W; Melkani, Aakanksha; Mieno, Taro
  42. Digital data and tools for managing agriculture: focusing on earth observation data and climate change. Proceedings of the Training Workshop on Digital Data and Tools for Managing Agriculture: Focusing on Earth Observation Data and Climate Change, Bhubaneswar, India, 21-23 December 2023 By Ghosh, Surajit; Mallick, A.; Dawn, A.; De Sarkar, K.; Chowdhury, A.; Kour, S.; Ghosh, A.; Holmatov, Bunyod
  43. Does integrating improved seeds with agronomic practices enhance farm performance? Evidence from rural Mozambique. By Asravor, Jacob; Wiredu, Alexander Nimo; Zeller, Manfred
  44. Direct and Indirect Impact of Weather Shock on Global Agricultural Trade By Zheng, Yixing; Grant, Jason; Legrand, Nicolas
  45. Rising US Imports of Oranges: Impacts on Land Use in Florida By Hammami, A.Malek; Li, Yi; Guan, Zhengfei
  46. Recency Effect of Weather Shocks on Fertilizer Adoption: Evidence from Nigeria By Nutsugah, Godwin K.; McCullough, Ellen
  47. Price Volatility Spillover from Energy to Animal Protein Markets in EU By Deb, Prokash; Li, Wenying; Sawadgo, Wendiam
  48. Does High-standard Farmland Construction Increase Farmer’s Income? By Xu, Wenyan; Gao, Ming; Zhu, Chen
  49. The Role of External Food Environments in Shaping Diets in Thailand and Lao PDR By Zanello, Giacomo; Srinivasan, Chittur S.; Haenssgen, Marco
  50. Salmonella Control in Chickens: 2000-2014 By Ollinger, Michael E.; Lim, Kar Ho; Evans, Peter
  51. The Market and Welfare Effects of the 2022 U.S. HPAI Outbreak By Ferrier, Peyton M.; Saavoss, Monica; Williamson, Samuel
  52. An Analysis of Preference for the Rural Residential environment and Landscape Improvements By Kim, Hyeon-Woong; Sung, Jae-hoon
  53. Resilient Roots: Navigating COVID-19's Impact on Small-scale Agriculture in Brazil’s Northeast By De La O Campos, Ana Paula; Covarrubias, Katia A.
  54. Combining digital technologies and incentives for water conservation: A Q-method study to understand preferences of French irrigators By Pauline Pedehour; Marianne Lefebvre
  55. Food Away from Home Expenditures in the United States as a Complex Economic System By Baugh, Kaylyn; Dharmasena, Senarath
  56. A Meta-Analysis of Consumer Willingness to Pay and Farmer Adoption Rates of Genetically Modified Crops By Badio, Levenson; Zapata, Samuel D.
  57. Ad Hoc and Farm Bill Payments Impact on Non-Real Estate Farm Debt By Chen, Le; Boyer, Christopher N.; Smith, Aaron
  58. The Impact of Electronic Benefit Transfer on WIC Participation: Evidence from Natality Data By Ambrozek, Charlotte; Beatty, Timothy; Zhan, Wenjie
  59. NourishNet: Proactive Severity State Forecasting of Food Commodity Prices for Global Warning Systems By Sydney Balboni; Grace Ivey; Brett Storoe; John Cisler; Tyge Plater; Caitlyn Grant; Ella Bruce; Benjamin Paulson
  60. The value of cultural heritage in the experience economy: Evidence from heirloom rice in the Philippines By Britwum, Kofi; Demont, Matty
  61. Adoption of Genetically Engineered Seeds in China: Predicting Treatment Effects on the Crop-Yield Distribution by Synthetic Control By Li, Yuansen; Tolhurst, Tor N.
  62. Estimating Demand Parameters for Cannabis Products in California By Sambucci, Olena; Sumner, Daniel A.; Lee, Sangwon
  63. A Partial Equilibrium Model for Analyzing the Economic Burden of Livestock Diseases By Shakil, Golam Saroare; Marsh, Thomas L.
  64. Inventory Competition and the Cost of a Stockout By Rabinovich, Elliot; Chenarides, Lauren; Richards, Timothy J.
  65. What can we learn about the coupon effects using a set of restrictive micro-level data? The Case of National Fresh Foods Coupon Policy in Korea By Hwang, Jeongha; Kim, Kwansoo
  66. Sustainability initiatives in food supply chains from stakeholders' perspectives: An analysis of predictors of cognition-based trust and trust initiatives By Cyrielle Gaglio; Simone Pfuderer; Bodo Steiner
  67. Shrinkflation? Quantifying the impact of changes in package size on food inflation By Rojas, Christian; Jaenicke, Edward C.; Page, Elina T.
  68. Caste dominance in rural credit markets: Evidence from India By Saha, Roshan; Taylor, Mykel R.; Hartarska, Valentina M.
  69. Impacts of HPAI Trade Restrictions on U.S. Poultry Exports in 2022-23 By Padilla, Samantha; Baker, Quinton J.
  70. Can Supporting Regenerative Agriculture Yield Brand Equity? Evidence from a Consumer Survey Experiment By Gill, Mackenzie; Costanigro, Marco; Berry, Chris
  71. The Effects of Food-demand Management on Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Its Economic Implications By Kim, Hyeon-Woong; Sung, Jae-hoon
  72. Institutional Land Ownership and Conservation Practice Adoption in the US Midwest By Tong, Jingyi; Bartalotti, Otavio C.; Zhang, Wendong
  73. Can the European Green Deal be a game changer for sustainable food system transformation? A computational political economy approach By Panknin, Lea; Boy, Karl-Friedrich; Henning, Christian H.C.A.
  74. Land Tenure and Conservation in Agriculture: Evidence from Nationwide Farm-level Data By Bahrami, Shahin; Rouhi Rad, Mani; Nayga, Rodolfo M.
  75. The Economic Impact of the Suspension of Agricultural Cooperation between North and South Korea By Lim, Changsik; Kim, Miwha; Im, Jeongbin
  76. Consumer Preferences for Online Grocery Shopping Attributes and Implications for Nutrition Security By Clark, Harrison; Chen, Xuqi; Yenerall, Jackie
  77. New York City’s Grocery Budget: An In-Depth Look at Public Food Procurement and Who Benefits Throughout the Supply Chain By Wasserman-Olin, Rebecca; Jablonski, Becca B. R.
  78. How do USDA Reports Affect Market Expectation for Future Price Movements in Grain Markets: Evidence from New Crop Futures? By Yang, Yao; McKenzie, Andrew M.
  79. Extreme Dry Spells and Larger Storms in the U.S. Midwest Raise Crop Prices By Cornejo, Magdalena; Merener, Nicolas; Merovich, Ezequiel
  80. Effects of Immigrant Legalization on US Agriculture: New Evidence for IRCA By Li, Minghao; Bucheli, Jose; Zhang, Wendong
  81. The Impact of Trade Openness on Regional Agricultural Productivity in Türkiye By Otgun, Hanifi; Fulginiti, Lilyan E.; Perrin, Richard K.
  82. Information quality of the Nutri-Score and companies’ communication strategy By Weinrich, Ramona; Petersen, Thies; Hirsch, Stefan
  83. Exploring the role of mangroves in mitigating food system emissions: bridging global experiences and local action By Taneja, Garima; Buisson, Marie-Charlotte
  84. International Wheat Trade and Spatial Market Integration in the Black Sea Region By Koprucu, Yilmaz; Tastan, Huseyin; Onel, Gulcan
  85. Price and Variety Effects of Introducing Plant-Based Meat Alternatives in the Meat Market By Nouve, Yawotse; Zheng, Yuqing; Zhao, Shuoli
  86. Market Dynamics and Consumer Responsiveness: Analyzing Price Elasticities of Demand for Meat Products at Farmers Markets By Rigotti, Luca; LeRoux, Matthew N.; Schmit, Todd M.
  87. Exploring USDA-FSA Farm Lending Patterns: Machine Learning-Based Models for Understanding the Impact of Borrower attributes on Loan Purposes By Zheng, Maoyong; Escalante, Cesar L.
  88. Aid not Replace? Produce Safety Rule Supplemental Training and Grower Learning in Latin America By Owusu, Eric; Narrod, Clare A.
  89. Uncovering the Key Transportation Links in the U.S. Domestic Food Supply Chain Through Disruption Simulations By Mo, Taejun; Dall'Erba, Sandy
  90. Economic and Environmental Impacts of Sustainable Agriculture in Practice and at Scale: Evidence from Mexico By Ferguson, Joel D.; Govaerts, Bram
  91. Shocks and Resilience in Food Supply Chains: Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on Türkiye’s Red Meat Markets By Koprucu, Yilmaz; Onel, Gulcan
  92. U.S. Demand for Peanut Butter Alternatives: The Case of Almond Butter, Hazelnut Butter, Walnut Butter and Mixed Nut Butter By Dharmasena, Senarath; Dong, Diansheng
  93. Impacts of improving cow-calf systems in a pasture based cattle production country. By Garcia-Suarez, Federico; Alvarez-Garcia, Camilo
  94. Economics of Accounting for Groundwater Use Under Conditions of Climate Change By Palmer, James “Jimmy”
  95. Impact of access to irrigation on crop productivity: Evidence from community-led lift irrigation schemes in India By Pracht, Wyatt; Dizon, Felipe; Yu, Jisang
  96. Veterinary Drug Maximum Residual Limits and One Health in a Global Context By Okunola, Akinbode M.; Dennis, Elliott J.; Beghin, John C.
  97. From Theory to Practice: Unraveling Russia's Agricultural Policy Evolution with Swinnen's Positive Theory By Kimsanova, Barchynai; Herzfeld, Thomas
  98. The Microeconomics of Agricultural Development: Risk, Institutions, and Agricultural Policy By James A. Roumasset
  99. Innovative Business Practices and the Productivity of Rural Establishments: Identifying Frontier Performers By Park, Timothy A.; Holmes, Marionette
  100. Mergers, store locations, and jobs: Evidence from the food retail industry By Lopez, Rigoberto A.; Mohapatra, Debashrita; Steinbach, Sandro
  101. Water Pollution Spillovers or Peer Effects? Determinants of Disease Outbreak in Shrimp Farming in Vietnam By Aya Suzuki; Susan Olivia; Vu Hoang Nam; Guenwoo Lee
  102. Government Transfers: Smoothing Food Expenditures During Recessions By Zeballos, Eliana; Islamaj, Ergys; Sinclair, Wilson J.
  103. Climate shocks and fertilizer responses: Field-level evidence for rice production in Bangladesh By Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Kishore, Avinash; Kumar, Anjani
  104. Do Different Types of Farm Service Agency Borrowers have Different Risk Behaviors? A Comparative Analysis of CRRA and CARA Approaches By Zheng, Maoyong; Escalante, Cesar L.
  105. The Impact of International Demand for Cereals on U.S. farmland prices: A Model Implied Instrumental Variable Approach By Nava, Noé J.; Morgan, Stephen N.; Ridley, William
  106. Information provision and network externalities: The impact of genomic testing on the dairy industry By Funes Leal, Victor E.; Hutchins, Jared P.
  107. Soybean Trade between the United States, Brazil and China: Interactions between Global Trade Flow and Gridded Agricultural and Environmental impacts By Wang, Zhan; Hertel, Thomas W.
  108. Designing Payments to Induce Low Carbon Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production in US Croplands By Majeed, Fahd; Khanna, Madhu; Miao, Ruiqing
  109. Country statistical capacity: a recent assessment tool and further reflections on the way forward By Dang, Hai Anh H.; Jolliffe, Dean; Serajuddin, Umar; Stacy, Brian
  110. Farm Characteristics and Cost of Borrowing By Fiechter, Chad M.; Miller, Noah J.; Ifft, Jennifer; Nelson, Blaine
  111. A Balanced Plate: The Impact of National School Lunch Program on Participant’s Food Components Consumption and Diet Quality. By Mishra, Vikas; Ishdorj, Ariun
  112. Rethinking the Significance of Scientific Information: A Field Experiment with Agricultural Producers By Kim, Hyunjung; Li, Tongzhe
  113. Local Economic Spillovers of Irrigation from the High Plains Aquifer to the Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Sectors By Yu, Kihwan; Hendricks, Nathan P.
  114. Socioeconomic Drivers of Food Waste Over Time: A Comparative Evaluation of Panel Stochastic Frontier Models for Indirect Quantification in Chinese Households By Liu, Rui; Lopez Barrera, Emiliano
  115. SNAP-Authorized Store Entry and Food Prices By Çakir, Metin; Li, Qingxiao; Zhang, Xiaowei; Gregory, Christian A.
  116. Assessing Dishonesty in Cocoa Value Chains: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence from Middlemen in Côte D'Ivoire By Boutin, Delphine; Jouvin, Marine; Olié, Louis
  117. How food insecure are Australians By Chandana Maitra
  118. Assessing the Geotemporal Resilience of the US Specialty Crop Value Chain By Villavicencio, Xavier A.; Zapata, Samuel D.; Xicay Xico, Anderson E.
  119. Land reallocation to increase production and reduce nitrogen surplus: impacts on crop diversity in England and Wales By De Almeida Furtado, Murilo; Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.; Ang, Frederic
  120. Product Differentiation and Equilibrium Transition: Local premium quality foods and marketing contracts in the Wisconsin fresh potato market By Utesov, Nurlan; Mitchell, Paul D.; Du, Xiaodong
  121. Mutual Recognition and Regulatory Disharmony in Organic Honey Certification By Bir, Courtney L.; Lambert, Lixia H.; Schaefer, K. Aleks
  122. Environmental monitoring and enforcement at animal feeding operations: The effects on surface water quality By Raff, Zach; Earnhart, Dietrich
  123. Long-term influence of social network and peers' characteristics on agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from Tanzania By Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Maredia, Mywish K.
  124. Partnership for Better or for Worse: Keeping Share Tenants on the Farm By Mark A. DeWeaver; James A. Roumasset
  125. Aging Labor Force, Climate Change and the Path to Green Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Agriculture By Wu, Qi; Liu, Shuyun; Fan, Shenggen
  126. Marketing “Local”: Exploring the Benefits and Geographic Reach of Using Place-Based Names for Beer Products By Fu, Yufei; Boys, Kathryn A.; Cengiz, Ezgi
  127. A Multi-Model, Ensemble Approach to Forecasting United States Food Prices By Liang, Weifang; Liu, Yong; Somogyi, Simon; Anderson, David P.
  128. Dynamic Linkages in Agricultural and Energy Markets: A Quantile Impulse Response Approach By Wang, Linjie; Chavas, Jean-Paul; Li, Jian
  129. Blown Away: The Influence of Wind Farms on Agricultural Land Values By Tanner, Sophia; Burnett, Wesley; Maguire, Karen; Winikoff, Justin
  130. A Machine Learning-based Exploration of Resilience through the Lens of Food Security By Villacis, Alexis H.; Badruddoza, Syed; Mishra, Ashok K.
  131. Measuring Housing Affordability For Domestic Agricultural Workers In California: Are They Facing a Housing Affordability Crisis? By Vivas Flores, Alexis E.; Beatty, Timothy
  1. By: Santhosh, Harikrishnan; Mullen, Jeffrey D.
    Keywords: Farm Management, Agricultural And Food Policy, Crop Production/Industries
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344035
  2. By: Beckman, Jayson; Dong, Fengxia; Ivanic, Maros; Jägermeyr, Jonas; Villoria, Nelson
    Abstract: Increasing agricultural productivity is vital to ensure that global food demand can be met. However, the impact of a changing climate on temperatures and precipitation could potentially influence agricultural productivity by affecting crop yields. This report combines the latest estimates of yield changes from the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project with projections of future productivity changes in the form of total factor productivity (TFP) to gain a better understanding of the future of agricultural production (and thus of food supply). Yield estimates are used from a high greenhouse gas emissions scenario (to show an upper bound, as the impact of climate on yields is the strongest) for corn, rice, soybeans, and wheat. Yield changes are then combined with TFP estimates across four scenarios where research and development (R&D) assumptions determine the rate of TFP growth. Finally, the changes in yields and TFP, in conjunction with changes in populations and incomes, are assessed to shape the projected state of food supply in 2050. The results suggest that with no additional R&D expenditures, climate change would result in a production-consumption gap. When R&D investments are increased by amounts corresponding to the remaining three scenarios, TFP growth is sufficient to mitigate the impacts of climate change and projected population/income growth to maintain production at a level to meet global demand for food.
    Keywords: Climate Change, Crop Production/Industries, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Food Security and Poverty, International Relations/Trade, Productivity Analysis, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies, Research Methods/ Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:uersrr:344129
  3. By: Amon, Kelvin; Wade, Tara; Gao, Zhifeng
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Farm Management, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344039
  4. By: Myeong, Su-hwan; Nam, Kyungsoo
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Risk And Uncertainty, Farm Management
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343797
  5. By: Cai, Yetian; Weng, Weizhe
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural And Food Policy, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343794
  6. By: Thomas Cherico Wanger; Estelle Raveloaritiana; Siyan Zeng; Haixiu Gao; Xueqing He; Yiwen Shao; Panlong Wu; Kris A. G. Wyckhuys; Wenwu Zhou; Yi Zou; Zengrong Zhu; Ling Li; Haiyan Cen; Yunhui Liu; Shenggen Fan
    Abstract: China is the leading crop producer and has successfully implemented sustainable development programs related to agriculture. Sustainable agriculture has been promoted to achieve national food security targets such as food self-sufficiency through the well-facilitated farmland construction (WFFC) approach. The WFFC is introduced in Chinas current national 10-year plan to consolidate farmlands into large and simplified production areas to maximise automation, and improve soil fertility and productivity. However, research suggests that diversified and smaller farms faciliate ecosystem services, can improve yield resilience, defuse human health threats, and increase farm profitability. Currently, WFFC has not considered ecological farmland improvements and it may miss long-term environmental benefits including ecosystem service preservation conducive to yields. Moreover, the nutritional status in China has changed in recent decades with undernutrition being dramatically reduced, but the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and chronic diseases being increased. While a strategic choice and management of crop and livestock species can improve nutrition, the environmental and production benefits of agricultural diversification are currently not well interlinked with Chinas food and nutrition security discussions. Lastly, the role of agricultural technology for socioeconomic benefits and the link with diversified agricultural production may provide vast benefits for food security. Here, we focus on the opportunities and co-benefits of agricultural diversification and technology innovations to advance food and nutrition security in China through ecosystem service and yield benefits. Our applied five-point research agenda can provide evidence-based opportunities to support China in reaching its ambitious food security targets through agricultural diversification with global ramifications.
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2407.01364
  7. By: Kakpo, Ange T.; Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul
    Keywords: Environmental Economics And Policy, Agricultural And Food Policy, Land Economics/Use
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344076
  8. By: Mobarok, Mohammad H.; Thompson, Wyatt
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Agricultural And Food Policy, Food Security And Poverty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343705
  9. By: Schling, Maja; Saenz, Magaly
    Keywords: Land Economics/Use, Agricultural And Food Policy, International Development
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343527
  10. By: Beatty, Timothy; Ambrozek, Charlotte; Pagan, Gina
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Food Security And Poverty, Institutional And Behavioral Economics
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343887
  11. By: Hartarska, Valentina M.; Adjei, Eugene; Nadolnyak, Denis A.
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Environmental Economics And Policy, Land Economics/Use
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343767
  12. By: Posey, Sean; Grant, Jared D.
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Food Security And Poverty, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343676
  13. By: Rawaa Laajimi (INRAE); Laurence Delattre (LEM); Hubert Jayet (LEM)
    Abstract: If the characteristics and location of farms and consumers involved in short food supply chain (SFSC) are well studied, especially for on-farm sales, the location of off-farm points of sale—as interaction points between supply and demand—has not been much analyzed, especially from a quantitative perspective. Though, a better understanding of the factors favoring and impeding the emergence of such points of sale could be valuable for producers (farmers), sellers (farmers or intermediaries), consumers (through consumers driven initiatives), and also for policymakers. To fill this gap, we have compiled an original database from local, regional, and national websites for the year 2020 and geolocalized more than 500 points of sale (pick-up point for sale by internet, pick-up point for community supported agriculture, producers' collective stores, markets, and retail stores) in two French departments (Nord and Pas-de-Calais). We account for the local environment of each point of sales, both in terms of potential supply of agricultural products and potential food demand, by relying on distance-weighted variables (inspired by the concept of market potential). We then
    Date: 2024–06–29
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:boc:fsug24:25
  14. By: Zhou, Jiajun; Mennig, Philipp; Sauer, Johannes
    Keywords: Production Economics, Productivity Analysis, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343528
  15. By: Wang, Tong; Jin, Hailong
    Keywords: Research And Development/ Tech Change/Emerging Technologies, Agricultural And Food Policy, Farm Management
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343974
  16. By: Melo, Grace; Palma, Marco A.; Ribera, Luis A.
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Agribusiness, Consumer/ Household Economics
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343870
  17. By: Morgan, Stephen N.; Padilla, Samantha
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Agricultural And Food Policy, Demand And Price Analysis
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343749
  18. By: De Carvalho Reis Neves, Mateus; De Figueiredo Silva, Felipe; Freitas, Carlos Otavio
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343652
  19. By: Zheng, Yanan; Yang, Meng; An, Henry; Qiu, Feng
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343647
  20. By: Panyi, Amadeo F.; Raper, Kellie Curry; Peel, Derrell
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Marketing, Livestock Production/Industries
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343834
  21. By: Zheng, Yanan; Goodhue, Rachael E.
    Keywords: Farm Management, Crop Production/Industries, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343560
  22. By: Okrent, Abigail M.; Zhen, Chen; Wang, Shaonan
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343838
  23. By: Wang, Xiangrui; Kong, Xiangwen
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Livestock Production/Industries, Community/Rural/Urban Development
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343573
  24. By: Akinwehinmi, Oluwagbenga J.; Colen, Liesbeth
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Consumer/ Household Economics, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343674
  25. By: Jeong, Junyoung; Cai, Yongyang; Roe, Brian E.
    Keywords: Environmental Economics And Policy, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343720
  26. By: Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku; Kornher, Lukas; Santeramo, Fabio G.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Food Security And Poverty, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343703
  27. By: Fiankor, Dela-Dem Doe; Dalheimer, Bernhard; Mack, Gabriele
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Agricultural And Food Policy, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343952
  28. By: Sariman, Sevval Buse; Rudi Polloshka, Jeta; Caputo, Vincenzina
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343684
  29. By: Lis-Castiblanco, Catherine; Jordi, Louis
    Keywords: Production Economics, Environmental Economics And Policy, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343569
  30. By: Woo, Sunghwi; Thompson, Wyatt; Arita, Shawn
    Keywords: Production Economics, Agricultural And Food Policy, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343907
  31. By: Nguyen, Nhu; Reeling, Carson; Verdier, Valentin
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Environmental Economics And Policy, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343675
  32. By: Hoeschle, Lisa; Wang, Hong Holly; Yu, Xiaohua
    Keywords: Food Security And Poverty, Agricultural And Food Policy, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343686
  33. By: Chen, Kevin; Hu, Shuang; Ji, Chen
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Environmental Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344015
  34. By: Li, Yi; Huang, Kuan-Ming; Guan, Zhengfei
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Agribusiness, Production Economics
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344053
  35. By: Chauhan, Milan; Lubben, Bradley D.
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Risk And Uncertainty, Livestock Production/Industries
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343813
  36. By: McWilliams, William N.; Isengildina Massa, Olga; Stewart, Shamar L.
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Agricultural And Food Policy, Risk And Uncertainty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343923
  37. By: Kim, Dongin; Steinbach, Sandro; Zurita, Carlos
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, International Development, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343898
  38. By: Sharma, Priyanka; Shanoyan, Aleksan; Yao, Becatien H.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, Production Economics
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344059
  39. By: Liu, Yizao; Fan, Linlin; Zhang, Yuxiang
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Industrial Organization
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343726
  40. By: Adewale, Caleb I.; Ndyomugyenyi, Elly K.; Mugonola, Basil
    Keywords: Farm Management, Agribusiness, Livestock Production/Industries
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343783
  41. By: Jayasekera, Deshamithra H W; Melkani, Aakanksha; Mieno, Taro
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Agricultural And Food Policy, Environmental Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343932
  42. By: Ghosh, Surajit; Mallick, A.; Dawn, A.; De Sarkar, K.; Chowdhury, A.; Kour, S.; Ghosh, A.; Holmatov, Bunyod
    Abstract: The report presents the prime aims, objectives, discussions and insights from the “Training Workshop on Digital Data and Tools for Managing Agriculture: Focusing on Earth Observation Data and Climate Change” organized at IIIT Bhubaneshwar from 21st to 23rd December 2023. The workshop was attended by 81 participants and jointly conducted by IIIT Bhubaneshwar, IWMI, and IEEE GRSS Kolkata Chapter. The primary objective of the workshop was to equip participants with practical skills and knowledge to utilize digital data and tools, especially Earth observation data, for effective agricultural management in the context of climate change and make evidence-based decisions to confront challenges in the food system, urban water pollution, GHG emissions & nexus. The programme encompassed the challenges posed by population growth, climate change and urbanization on the water, food and energy nexus, and the need to address the complexities to achieve sustainable development and mitigate environmental impacts is necessary. Through various sessions, the workshop highlighted concerns about GHG emissions and their mitigation by transitioning to renewable energy, carbon capture and storage, water hyacinth mapping in urban and peri-urban wetlands, Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) applications for rice mapping, flood damage assessment, maternal, infant and young children nutrition deficit under extreme weather conditions, agricultural data collection tools and sustainable agriculture practices. The CGIAR’s Mitigate+: Low-Emission Food Systems Initiative focuses on reducing emissions from the food systems by developing robust science, data, and evidence (among other activities). Another initiative by CGIAR on Resilient Cities generates evidence, technologies, and capacities that help improve urban food systems and secure equitable job and business opportunities, healthy diets for all, human and environmental health, and a reduced carbon footprint. Both initiatives provided resources to support the training workshop to empower students, researchers, scientists, academicians, decision-makers, and policymakers with cutting-edge knowledge and tools to integrate digital data into agricultural management practices. Participants learned about the latest advancements in Earth observation technologies, big data analytics, and digital tools that can help predict and make robust, evidence-based decisions as they confront challenges in the food system, urban water pollution, strategies to reduce GHG emissions, and tackling the nexus challenges. Thus, the workshop was envisioned as a catalyst to empower the agricultural community with digital tools and data, fostering resilience and productivity in the face of climate change. The criticality of Earth Observation (EO) data and digital tools in informing agricultural management decisions was rigorously examined and elucidated through a comprehensive program comprising six keynote addresses, nine scholarly lectures and six practical demonstrations, all facilitated by esteemed national (including IIT Guwahati, IIWM, Assam University, OSDMA, SAADRI, and SPARC) and international institutions (such as IWMI, World Bank, and DLR). A pre-event catch up with the participants was held on the first day session as a social ice-breaking session. The discourse was further enriched by an expert panel discussion on the ‘Role of Digital Tools in Mitigating Climate Change Effects on Agriculture’, an intensive brainstorming session entitled ‘Data Science and Sustainability Challenge’ and a showcase of research presentation by the participants. These engagements highlighted the practical and innovative usages of EO data for managing agriculture in the context of climatic challenges and emphasized how such strategic applications contribute towards attaining the SDGs. Of the 82 participants, 63% are male, and 37% are female. Among the attendees, 52% were at the graduate and post-graduate level, while 26% of the participants were research scholars from various Indian institutions. Of the other participants, 22% were faculty and professionals. This diversity of participants demonstrates the programme’s appeal to different professionals and researchers. The participants come from multiple institutions, including renowned universities and research centres across India like IIT Roorkee, BIT Mesra, ISI Kolkata, Techno Main Salt Lake, IIT Kharagpur, IIT Mandi, Fakir Mohan University, KIIT, and many more. This institutional diversity indicates the programme’s broader reach and appeal among academic and research organizations. These analytics provide valuable insights into the participants’ gender distribution, designations, education levels, and institutional affiliations. The inclusivity and diversity, reflected in gender representation and institutional affiliations, created a dynamic and comprehensive learning community. The diverse curriculum gave them valuable knowledge and skills to solve real-life challenges associated with major natural disasters.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Climate Change, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies
    Date: 2023–12–31
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iwmicp:344116
  43. By: Asravor, Jacob; Wiredu, Alexander Nimo; Zeller, Manfred
    Keywords: Production Economics, Productivity Analysis, Crop Production/Industries
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344063
  44. By: Zheng, Yixing; Grant, Jason; Legrand, Nicolas
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Food Security And Poverty, Environmental Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343988
  45. By: Hammami, A.Malek; Li, Yi; Guan, Zhengfei
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Land Economics/Use, Crop Production/Industries
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343992
  46. By: Nutsugah, Godwin K.; McCullough, Ellen
    Keywords: International Development, Institutional And Behavioral Economics, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343582
  47. By: Deb, Prokash; Li, Wenying; Sawadgo, Wendiam
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Agricultural And Food Policy, Food Security And Poverty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343809
  48. By: Xu, Wenyan; Gao, Ming; Zhu, Chen
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Land Economics/Use, Labor And Human Capital
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343587
  49. By: Zanello, Giacomo; Srinivasan, Chittur S.; Haenssgen, Marco
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural And Food Policy, Health Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343737
  50. By: Ollinger, Michael E.; Lim, Kar Ho; Evans, Peter
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Industrial Organization, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343832
  51. By: Ferrier, Peyton M.; Saavoss, Monica; Williamson, Samuel
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Demand And Price Analysis, Production Economics
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343787
  52. By: Kim, Hyeon-Woong; Sung, Jae-hoon
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Environmental Economics And Policy, Community/Rural/Urban Development
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343815
  53. By: De La O Campos, Ana Paula; Covarrubias, Katia A.
    Keywords: Consumer/ Household Economics, Risk And Uncertainty, Food Security And Poverty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343756
  54. By: Pauline Pedehour (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - Institut Agro Rennes Angers - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, CONFLUENCES - SFR UA 4201 Confluences - UA - Université d'Angers); Marianne Lefebvre (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - Institut Agro Rennes Angers - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, CONFLUENCES - SFR UA 4201 Confluences - UA - Université d'Angers)
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the preferences for a water conservation scheme that has not yet been implemented by combining digital tools with pilot irrigation and incentives for farmers to adopt deficit irrigation. We conducted a Q-study with 25 farmers and irrigation advisors in two French watersheds highly dependent on irrigation. We found that the material implementation of the scheme (sensors, smartphone app...) is largely accepted. However, the incentive design is less consensual, i.e., how irrigation performance is defined and what is at stake for those performing better in deficit irrigation. A wider survey with 202 farmers allows to assess how the four profiles highlighted with the Q-study distribute in the farming population of the two watersheds. This study contributes to understanding how farmers perceive a combination of technological levers and incentives to foster water conservation.
    Keywords: Deficit Irrigation, Water, Agriculture, Q method, Technology acceptance, Water allocation scheme
    Date: 2023–11–13
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04626643
  55. By: Baugh, Kaylyn; Dharmasena, Senarath
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Food Security And Poverty, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343933
  56. By: Badio, Levenson; Zapata, Samuel D.
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Consumer/ Household Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343972
  57. By: Chen, Le; Boyer, Christopher N.; Smith, Aaron
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Farm Management, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343617
  58. By: Ambrozek, Charlotte; Beatty, Timothy; Zhan, Wenjie
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural And Food Policy, Food Security And Poverty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343905
  59. By: Sydney Balboni; Grace Ivey; Brett Storoe; John Cisler; Tyge Plater; Caitlyn Grant; Ella Bruce; Benjamin Paulson
    Abstract: Price volatility in global food commodities is a critical signal indicating potential disruptions in the food market. Understanding forthcoming changes in these prices is essential for bolstering food security, particularly for nations at risk. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) previously developed sophisticated statistical frameworks for the proactive prediction of food commodity prices, aiding in the creation of global early warning systems. These frameworks utilize food security indicators to produce accurate forecasts, thereby facilitating preparations against potential food shortages. Our research builds on these foundations by integrating robust price security indicators with cutting-edge deep learning (DL) methodologies to reveal complex interdependencies. DL techniques examine intricate dynamics among diverse factors affecting food prices. Through sophisticated time-series forecasting models coupled with a classification model, our approach enhances existing models to better support communities worldwide in advancing their food security initiatives.
    Date: 2024–06
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2407.00698
  60. By: Britwum, Kofi; Demont, Matty
    Keywords: Marketing, Consumer/ Household Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343802
  61. By: Li, Yuansen; Tolhurst, Tor N.
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, International Development
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343921
  62. By: Sambucci, Olena; Sumner, Daniel A.; Lee, Sangwon
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Agricultural And Food Policy, Marketing
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343943
  63. By: Shakil, Golam Saroare; Marsh, Thomas L.
    Keywords: Livestock Production/Industries, Productivity Analysis, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343967
  64. By: Rabinovich, Elliot; Chenarides, Lauren; Richards, Timothy J.
    Keywords: Industrial Organization, Marketing, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343649
  65. By: Hwang, Jeongha; Kim, Kwansoo
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344046
  66. By: Cyrielle Gaglio (University of Helsinki); Simone Pfuderer (University of Reading); Bodo Steiner (University of Helsinki)
    Abstract: This presentation aims to improve our understanding of the role of trust in the context of sustainability initiatives, from multiple supply chain (consumer and producer) perspectives, employing a set of logistic regression models. First, it analyzes consumer preferences regarding sustainability initiatives that food supply chain stakeholders (farmers, retailers, food processors, food service providers) could potentially implement from a consumer perspective to increase consumer trust. This consumer perspective is then contrasted with a producer perspective, where we aim to understand the drivers of producers' trust into externally provided sustainability initiatives (certi
    Date: 2024–06–29
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:boc:fsug24:24
  67. By: Rojas, Christian; Jaenicke, Edward C.; Page, Elina T.
    Keywords: Industrial Organization, Agricultural And Food Policy, Demand And Price Analysis
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343770
  68. By: Saha, Roshan; Taylor, Mykel R.; Hartarska, Valentina M.
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, International Development, Risk And Uncertainty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343873
  69. By: Padilla, Samantha; Baker, Quinton J.
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Livestock Production/Industries, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343597
  70. By: Gill, Mackenzie; Costanigro, Marco; Berry, Chris
    Keywords: Marketing, Consumer/ Household Economics, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343983
  71. By: Kim, Hyeon-Woong; Sung, Jae-hoon
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Environmental Economics And Policy, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343816
  72. By: Tong, Jingyi; Bartalotti, Otavio C.; Zhang, Wendong
    Keywords: Farm Management, Land Economics/Use
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343808
  73. By: Panknin, Lea; Boy, Karl-Friedrich; Henning, Christian H.C.A.
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Political Economy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343740
  74. By: Bahrami, Shahin; Rouhi Rad, Mani; Nayga, Rodolfo M.
    Keywords: Environmental Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343986
  75. By: Lim, Changsik; Kim, Miwha; Im, Jeongbin
    Keywords: International Development, International Relations/Trade, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343626
  76. By: Clark, Harrison; Chen, Xuqi; Yenerall, Jackie
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Consumer/ Household Economics, Marketing
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343781
  77. By: Wasserman-Olin, Rebecca; Jablonski, Becca B. R.
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Public Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344013
  78. By: Yang, Yao; McKenzie, Andrew M.
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Agricultural Finance, Production Economics
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343618
  79. By: Cornejo, Magdalena; Merener, Nicolas; Merovich, Ezequiel
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Financial Economics, Marketing
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343690
  80. By: Li, Minghao; Bucheli, Jose; Zhang, Wendong
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Labor And Human Capital
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344058
  81. By: Otgun, Hanifi; Fulginiti, Lilyan E.; Perrin, Richard K.
    Keywords: Productivity Analysis, Production Economics, International Development
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343572
  82. By: Weinrich, Ramona; Petersen, Thies; Hirsch, Stefan
    Keywords: Marketing, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343725
  83. By: Taneja, Garima; Buisson, Marie-Charlotte
    Abstract: Mangrove forests are one of the most impactful carbon-trapping ecosystems, they are effective at locking away vast amounts of "blue carbon" and the IPCC (IPCC, 2022) report encourages the protection of coastal vegetative ecosystems as part of integrated coastal resource management. Mangrove also strengthens resilience to climate change by reducing the impacts of sea level rise, saltwater intrusion, cyclones, and floods. Mangrove forests in Vietnam are currently under threat from expansion of shrimp aquaculture. However, their role in the food systems of coastal and island communities is often ignored. For instance, they provide woods for cooking, its fruits (from the keora trees) are collected and sold especially by women, and it also hosts a rich ecosystem including aquatic foods and acts as breeding and nursery ground for economically and nutritionally important fish species. Mangrove afforestation programs can, in that sense, be considered as Low Emission Food Systems technologies, including in MITIGATE+ target countries like Vietnam. This report reviews the literature on mangrove afforestation programs globally to identify the enablers and drivers of scaling. Specifically, the programs are characterized to identify the technologies and innovations in place, and the governance models and institutional drivers are assessed. Thus, the report is divided into four sections. The first section presents a global overview of mangrove plantations, their historical and present status, the drivers of mangrove deforestation globally and at country level. The second section reviews mangrove afforestation programs, the inception of these programs, their objectives and the governance and institutional models followed. The third section focuses on mangroves in Vietnam, it features some of the successful examples implemented in the country and analyses the supporting government policies. The last section is the conclusion which draws lessons on the factors required for successful mangrove restoration programs.
    Keywords: Climate Change, Food Security and Poverty
    Date: 2023–12–31
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iwmwpb:344120
  84. By: Koprucu, Yilmaz; Tastan, Huseyin; Onel, Gulcan
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Demand And Price Analysis, Food Security And Poverty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344055
  85. By: Nouve, Yawotse; Zheng, Yuqing; Zhao, Shuoli
    Keywords: Industrial Organization, Marketing, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343795
  86. By: Rigotti, Luca; LeRoux, Matthew N.; Schmit, Todd M.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Demand And Price Analysis, Marketing
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343558
  87. By: Zheng, Maoyong; Escalante, Cesar L.
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Farm Management, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343857
  88. By: Owusu, Eric; Narrod, Clare A.
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural And Food Policy, International Development
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343788
  89. By: Mo, Taejun; Dall'Erba, Sandy
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343723
  90. By: Ferguson, Joel D.; Govaerts, Bram
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Environmental Economics And Policy, Research And Development/ Tech Change/Emerging Technologies
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343753
  91. By: Koprucu, Yilmaz; Onel, Gulcan
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Livestock Production/Industries, Health Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344049
  92. By: Dharmasena, Senarath; Dong, Diansheng
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Consumer/ Household Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344034
  93. By: Garcia-Suarez, Federico; Alvarez-Garcia, Camilo
    Keywords: Production Economics, Productivity Analysis, Livestock Production/Industries
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343563
  94. By: Palmer, James “Jimmy”
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Climate Change
    Date: 2024–07–27
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344183
  95. By: Pracht, Wyatt; Dizon, Felipe; Yu, Jisang
    Keywords: Production Economics, International Development
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343615
  96. By: Okunola, Akinbode M.; Dennis, Elliott J.; Beghin, John C.
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Health Economics And Policy, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343599
  97. By: Kimsanova, Barchynai; Herzfeld, Thomas
    Keywords: Agricultural And Food Policy, Political Economy, Demand And Price Analysis
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343596
  98. By: James A. Roumasset (Department of Economics, University of Hawaii at Manoa)
    Abstract: Assertions of pervasive inefficiency in the behavior and organization of developing agriculture are found to be based on unsound methodologies. Models apparently based on expected utility theory are theoretically flawed and use highly restrictive assumptions that make them largely irrelevant for explaining actual decisions. When a more appropriate model is applied to the case of the green revolution in the Philippines, the hypothesis that loss aversion impedes adoption of new technology is rejected. Common assertions about the inefficiency of agricultural institutions are also found wanting. The risk-bearing theory share- tenancy, which is thought to imply high agency costs associated with effort shirking, cannot explain observed tenant shares. Once the disadvantages of fixed-lease contracts are recognized, sharing is plausibly second-best efficient. The purported inefficiency implied by the inverse relationship between farm size and yield per hectare also dissipates once the endogeneity of farm size is accounted for. In as much as efficiency can explain the stylized facts of behavior and organization in developing agriculture, policy recommendations based on misplaced exogeneity should be viewed with considerable skepticism.
    Keywords: Loss-aversion, uncertainty, share tenancy, developing agriculture, nature of the firm
    JEL: D01 G22 J43 O12 Q12 Q15
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hai:wpaper:202403
  99. By: Park, Timothy A.; Holmes, Marionette
    Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban Development, Productivity Analysis, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343903
  100. By: Lopez, Rigoberto A.; Mohapatra, Debashrita; Steinbach, Sandro
    Keywords: Industrial Organization, Demand And Price Analysis, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343711
  101. By: Aya Suzuki (University of Tokyo); Susan Olivia (University of Waikato); Vu Hoang Nam (Faculty of International Economics, Foreign Trade University); Guenwoo Lee (Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences)
    Abstract: Disease outbreak is a major issue in aquaculture sector that may lead to a significant economic loss. While the source of disease is difficult to trace, understanding how it occurs is important in mitigating the problem. One important factor that has not received sufficient attention is the presence of spillover among fish farmers who are connected by waterways. In this paper, we examine the presence of spillover among shrimp farmers in Southern Vietnam based on the primary data. In particular, we quantify the effects of water pollution spillover of disease outbreak in one farm to another farm and the peer effects of farming practices among the neighbors. We solve the reflection problem posed by Manski (1993) by employing a method developed by Bramoullé et al. (2009) in social network analyses. Our findings indicate that neighbors' farming practices indeed positively affect a farmer's practices and the disease outbreak in neighbors' ponds affects the disease outbreak in a farmer's pond, even after controlling for contextual peer effects and correlated effects. The magnitude of negative effects from neighbors' ponds on disease outbreak may offset the positive effects from farmers' good farming practices, suggesting the importance of considering neighboring farmers as a group in addressing the issue of disease control.
    Keywords: peer effect; shrimp farming; Vietnam
    JEL: O12 Q10 Q56 D62
    Date: 2024–07–09
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wai:econwp:24/04
  102. By: Zeballos, Eliana; Islamaj, Ergys; Sinclair, Wilson J.
    Keywords: Consumer/ Household Economics, Demand And Price Analysis, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343953
  103. By: Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Kishore, Avinash; Kumar, Anjani
    Keywords: Production Economics, Productivity Analysis, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343591
  104. By: Zheng, Maoyong; Escalante, Cesar L.
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Farm Management, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343624
  105. By: Nava, Noé J.; Morgan, Stephen N.; Ridley, William
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Land Economics/Use, Farm Management
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343532
  106. By: Funes Leal, Victor E.; Hutchins, Jared P.
    Keywords: Industrial Organization, Food Security And Poverty, Research And Development/ Tech Change/Emerging Technologies
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343742
  107. By: Wang, Zhan; Hertel, Thomas W.
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Land Economics/Use, Environmental Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343755
  108. By: Majeed, Fahd; Khanna, Madhu; Miao, Ruiqing
    Keywords: Resource/Energy Economics And Policy, Environmental Economics And Policy, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344043
  109. By: Dang, Hai Anh H.; Jolliffe, Dean; Serajuddin, Umar; Stacy, Brian
    Abstract: A country's statistical capacity takes an indispensable part in its development. We offer a comprehensive comparison between the World Bank's Statistical Performance Indicators and Index (SPI) and its predecessor, the Statistical Capacity Index (SCI) regarding different conceptual and empirical aspects. We further examine the relationships of the two indexes with some agriculture development indicators such as food security, food sustainability and productivity as well as other key indicators including headcount poverty, GDP per capita, and an SDG progress index. Our analysis employs the latest SPI data update in 2022, which were not available in previous studies. We also propose clear guidelines on how the SPI can be maintained and updated in the future to ensure that this process is transparent, replicable, safeguarded with high quality, and provides comparable data over time.
    Keywords: food security; national statistical system; Statistical capacity; statistical capacity index; statistical performance
    JEL: C1
    Date: 2024–06–11
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:124060
  110. By: Fiechter, Chad M.; Miller, Noah J.; Ifft, Jennifer; Nelson, Blaine
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Financial Economics, Risk And Uncertainty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343924
  111. By: Mishra, Vikas; Ishdorj, Ariun
    Keywords: Health Economics And Policy, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural And Food Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343600
  112. By: Kim, Hyunjung; Li, Tongzhe
    Keywords: Research And Development/ Tech Change/Emerging Technologies, Institutional And Behavioral Economics, Farm Management
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344038
  113. By: Yu, Kihwan; Hendricks, Nathan P.
    Keywords: Resource/Energy Economics And Policy, Production Economics, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343762
  114. By: Liu, Rui; Lopez Barrera, Emiliano
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Food Security And Poverty, International Development
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343852
  115. By: Çakir, Metin; Li, Qingxiao; Zhang, Xiaowei; Gregory, Christian A.
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Industrial Organization
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344056
  116. By: Boutin, Delphine (University of Bordeaux); Jouvin, Marine (University of Bordeaux); Olié, Louis
    Abstract: This study investigates dishonest behavior among cocoa middlemen in Côte d'Ivoire, focusing on the role of observability and financial penalties in deterring such behavior. Using on a modified version of the "die-under-cup task", we examine the cheating behaviors of 151 cocoa middlemen over several interaction rounds. Our findings reveal that cheating is prevalent among cocoa middlemen, with 78% of players cheating at least once during the game. However, we found heterogeneous cheating patterns: 59% of cocoa middlemen consistently cheated when faced with a losing outcome, even when the risk of detection and sanction is high, 22% of them never cheated, and 19% did so occasionally. Key factors influencing cheating include age, religion, and risk attitudes. The study finds that introducing monitoring and sanctions significantly reduces cheating, highlighting the effectiveness of such mechanisms in deterring dishonest behaviors. By shedding light on the prevalence and determinants of cheating among cocoa middlemen, this study contributes to the experimental literature on dishonest behavior and understanding middlemen's role in agricultural value chains.
    Keywords: dishonesty, middlemen, agricultural value chain, observability, financial penalties, lab-in-the-field experiment
    JEL: C91 C93 D82 D91
    Date: 2024–06
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17078
  117. By: Chandana Maitra
    Abstract: In this paper, I estimate prevalence of food insecurity in Australia using fresh data on Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), a cross-culturally validated eight-item measure of economic access to food, developed by the UN Food & Agricultural Organization and reported, for the first time, in 2020 Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. Prevalence of food insecurity is reported at person level, and at varying levels of severity. First, I examine how well the data fits the theoretical construct of single parameter Rasch model, on which FIES is based. Next, I estimate prevalence rates at the national and regional levels using two alternative techniques. The first approach produces cross-nationally comparable prevalence estimates based on the common thresholds set on a global reference scale developed by FAO’s Voices of the Hungry Project. Based on this approach, in 2020, one in sixteen (roughly 1.65 million) people experienced moderate to severe food insecurity and one in twenty-nine (0.88 million) people experienced severe food insecurity in Australia. The second approach defines Australia-specific thresholds on the national scale to generate prevalence estimates which are not directly comparable across countries but are more meaningful for the purpose of policy related communications within Australia. Based on this method, in 2020, one in eleven (roughly 2.41 million) people were food insecure in Australia, of which one in fourteen (roughly 1.87 million) people were moderately food insecure and one in forty-seven (roughly 0.54 million) people were severely food insecure. One in twenty-four (roughly 1.076 million) people were marginally food secure. By all specifications, South Australia and Queensland are the most food insecure states closely followed by Tasmania. Overall, the results establish the reliability and validity of FIES as a tool to measure food insecurity in Australia. All items fit the scale well. However, care must be taken while administering the surveys so that the meaning of the items is conveyed unambiguously to the respondents. Certain subpopulations such as people with low income and low education, First Nations people, people with long term health conditions, young adults, lone persons are at higher risks of moderate and severe food insecurity. These findings indicate that food security policies must be tailored to suit the specific needs of the diverse geographical and socio-economic contexts. Results of this study confirm the general concern in the literature that single-item measures underestimate food insecurity. Australia must consider regular monitoring of food insecurity, preferably, using an Australia-specific metric. Closing the data gap is critical for both academic research and policy purposes.
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:syd:wpaper:2024-14
  118. By: Villavicencio, Xavier A.; Zapata, Samuel D.; Xicay Xico, Anderson E.
    Keywords: Demand And Price Analysis, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:344030
  119. By: De Almeida Furtado, Murilo; Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.; Ang, Frederic
    Keywords: Production Economics
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343878
  120. By: Utesov, Nurlan; Mitchell, Paul D.; Du, Xiaodong
    Keywords: Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343964
  121. By: Bir, Courtney L.; Lambert, Lixia H.; Schaefer, K. Aleks
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Livestock Production/Industries, Marketing
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343896
  122. By: Raff, Zach; Earnhart, Dietrich
    Keywords: Environmental Economics And Policy, Livestock Production/Industries
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343659
  123. By: Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Maredia, Mywish K.
    Keywords: International Development, Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession, Research And Development/ Tech Change/Emerging Technologies
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343777
  124. By: Mark A. DeWeaver (Kogod School ofÊBusiness, American University); James A. Roumasset (Department of Economics, University of Hawaii at Manoa)
    Abstract: The risk-bearing theory of share tenancy has been found to be inconsistent with actual tenant shares, meaning there must be additional disadvantages of lease contracts in order to explain the historical prevalence of share tenancy. One such disadvantage is that fixed-rent contracts incentivize land abuse. We complement this explanation here by providing a dynamic context in which the land- abuse decision is linked to the tenantÕs decision to renew the contract. By offering appropriate share contracts, landlords can incentivize contract renewal, thereby both lowering the incentive for land abuse and preserving the tenantÕs land-specific human capital. In our model, tenants decide each period whether to terminate their contracts and abuse landlord-owned assets based on prior and updated beliefs about the likelihood of bad seasons. Share contracts are shown to be more likely than lease contracts to survive one or more bad harvests.
    Keywords: share tenancy, opportunism, land abuse, contract choice, institutional economics, agricultural firms
    JEL: J41 J43 O13 Q12 Q15
    Date: 2024–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hai:wpaper:202402
  125. By: Wu, Qi; Liu, Shuyun; Fan, Shenggen
    Keywords: International Development, Labor And Human Capital, Environmental Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343729
  126. By: Fu, Yufei; Boys, Kathryn A.; Cengiz, Ezgi
    Keywords: Marketing, Demand And Price Analysis, Agribusiness
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343991
  127. By: Liang, Weifang; Liu, Yong; Somogyi, Simon; Anderson, David P.
    Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343687
  128. By: Wang, Linjie; Chavas, Jean-Paul; Li, Jian
    Keywords: Risk And Uncertainty, Agribusiness, Demand And Price Analysis
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343541
  129. By: Tanner, Sophia; Burnett, Wesley; Maguire, Karen; Winikoff, Justin
    Keywords: Resource/Energy Economics And Policy
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343970
  130. By: Villacis, Alexis H.; Badruddoza, Syed; Mishra, Ashok K.
    Keywords: International Development, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Food Security And Poverty
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343542
  131. By: Vivas Flores, Alexis E.; Beatty, Timothy
    Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban Development, Labor And Human Capital, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:343954
This nep-agr issue is ©2024 by Angelo Zago. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.
This page is being maintained by Thomas Krichel. It was last updated on 2024‒08‒29 at 13:08.