nep-agr New Economics Papers
on Agricultural Economics
Issue of 2024‒03‒04
sixty-four papers chosen by
  1. Global Agricultural Value Chains and Food Prices By Dalheimer, Bernhard; Lim, Sunghun; Bellemare, Marc
  2. Russia-Ukraine War-Led Supply Disruption of Staple Foods in the Net Food Importing Countries By Ahn, Soojung; Steinbach, Sandro
  3. The impacts of economic sanctions on food (prices) security: Evidence from targeted countries By Afesorgbor, S. Kwaku; Kornher, Lukas; Santeramo, Fabio
  4. Taxing Agriculture: The Tradeoffs between Lowering GHG Emissions and Decreasing Production By Beckman, Jayson; Dong, Fengxia; Ivanic, Maros
  5. Direct and Indirect Impact of Growing Season Weather Shocks on Global Agricultural Trade By Zheng, Yixing; Grant, Jason; Legrand, Nicolas; Arita, Shawn; Sydow, Sharon
  6. Do RTAs really aect agri-food trade? Evidence from a meta-analysis By Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku
  7. China’s Role in the Global Rice Market and Implications for West Africa’s Food Security By Lin, Jessie; Johnson, Michael; Gale, Fred
  8. Geo-Strategic Aspects of Food Trade and Food Security in the Light of Recent Global Tensions – Policy Choices in Country Cases By Rudloff, Bettina; Wieck, Christine; Mensah, Kristina
  9. Global Grain Supply Response, Production Heterogeneities and Trade Openness: Implications for Global Food Security By Zereyesus, Yacob; Kee, Jennifer; Morgan, Stephen; Nava, Noe; Cardell, Lila
  10. Agri-Food Trade and Cooperation, Measuring Sectoral Effects of the EU-UK post-Brexity Trade Agreement By Gerval, Adam; Jelliffe, Jeremy; Johnson, William
  11. Impacts of Price Insulation on World Wheat Markets By Martin, Will; Minot, Nick
  12. Farm to World: How Does Traceability Affect International Trade in Agricultural Products? By Bispo, Scarlett Queen Almeida; Silva, Fernanda Aparecida; Martins, Michelle Márcia Viana; Nonnenberg, Marcelo José Braga; Vianna, Ruan da Silva
  13. Regulatory Heterogeneity, Trade, and Global Agricultural Value Chains By Fiankor, Dela-Dem Doe; Dalheimer, Bernhard; Mack, Gabriele
  14. Free Trade and the Environmental Impacts of Agriculture By Lundberg, Clark; Hutson, Stephanie
  15. Impacts of Pandemic-Related Shipping Container and Labor Shortages on U.S. Agricultural Trade and Farm Income By Kenner, Bart; Russell, Dylan; Kaufman, James; Valdez, Constanza,; Wagner, Jake; Hossen, Deluair; Jessup, Eric; Muhammad, Andrew; Zhao, Mengshan
  16. Farm to Firm: Clustering and Returns to Scale in Agricultural Supply Chain By Sayre, James E
  17. Decomposing a Year of Uncertainty in Agricultural Markets By Beckman, Jayson; Ivanic, Maros
  18. Firms’ Labor Market Power and Export Activities: Evidence from the French Food Processing Industry By Engemann, Helena; Jafari, Yaghoob; Heckelei, Thomas; Latouche, Karine
  19. Modeling how and why aquatic vegetation removal can free rural households from poverty-disease traps By Molly J Doruska; Christopher B Barrett; Jason R Rohr
  20. Agricultural Value Chains – Evolving Towards Massively Modular Ecosystems? By Taglioni, Daria
  21. Potential unexpected effects of meat reduction in diet: Could educational attainment influence meat substitution strategies? By Pierre Levasseur; François Mariotti; Isabelle Denis; Olga Davidenko
  22. Multi-Mode Trade Policy Retaliation By Feinberg, Robert M.; Nes, Kjersti; Reynolds, Kara M.; Schaefer, K. Aleks
  23. Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: How Do Partial Equilibrium Bilateral Trade Projections Compare to Realized Market Outcomes? By Grant, Jason; Legrand, Nicolas; Bolub, Alla; Arita, Shawn; Sydow, Sharon
  24. Analyzing the Dynamics of Food Price Inflation: An examination of Labour Costs, Supply Chains and Retail Food Price Inflation By Zhu, Xiaoyu; Barichello, Richard; Vercammen, James
  25. From promises to action: Analyzing global commitments on food security and diets since 2015 By Zorbas, Christina; Resnick, Danielle; Jones, Eleanor; Suri, Shoba; Iruhiriye, Elyse; Headey, Derek D.; Martin, Will; Vos, Rob; Arndt, Channing; Menon, Purnima
  26. Modeling Probability of Notifications of Phytosanitary Non-Conformities in Apples and Pears Cargos Imported by Brazil By Monteferrante, Eduardo; Lopes, Willian; Miranda, Silvia
  27. Analyzing the Impacts of Trade Sanctions on Fertilizer Trade Amidst the Russia-Ukraine War: A Dynamic Demand Approach By Hossen, Deluair; Muhammad, Andrew; Steinbach, Sandro
  28. USJTA Safeguard Renegotiation and U.S. Access to Japan’s Beef Market By Sabala, Ethan; Davis, Eric
  29. Global Economic Effects of War-Induced Agricultural Export Declines from Ukraine By Countryman, Amanda M.; Litvinov, Valentyn; Kolodiazhnyi, Ivan; Bogonos, Mariia; Nivievskyi, Oleg
  30. Opening the ‘Black Box’ of Globally Traded Grains in Africa By Sauer, Christine; Reardon, Tom
  31. Global Container Shipping Disruptions, Pop-Up Ports, and U.S. Agricultural Exports By Steinbach, Sandro; Zhuang, Xiting
  32. Agricultural Trade and Consumer Demand in China: The Impact of the Phase One Trade Agreement By Feemstra, Robert; Hong, Chang
  33. Consequences of the Russian-Ukraine War for the Wheat Industry By Devadoss, Stephen; Ridley, Wililam
  34. The Effects of Unilateral or Bilateral GHG Policy of USA and EU on Agricultural Trade By Woo, Sunghwi; Thompson, Wyatt
  35. Preferential Trading in Agriculture: New Insights from a Structural Gravity Analysis and Machine Learning By Kim, Dongin
  36. Pulling Back the Veil: What Quota Prices Can Reveal about Quota Buying Decisions and Milk Production Economics By Barichello, Rick
  37. “When you need it quick, let us ship it right”: On the Importance of Port Efficiency and Service Quality to Comply with Food Trade Standards in Ghana By Kornher, Lukas; Sakyi, Daniel; Tannor, Linus Linnaeus
  38. Protection of Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements: is it worth it? By Emlinger, Charlotte; Latouche, Karine
  39. Symbiotic Resilience among Agrifood Product, Input, and Services Value Chains in the Face of Shocks By Reardon, Tom; Awokuse, Titus
  40. Low Exchange Rate Pass-Through in the United States, Economy-Wide and in Agriculture By Johnson, Will; Zeng, Wendy
  41. AMSs but No Boxes: The Path to Domestic Support Rules in the 1994 WTO Agreement on Agriculture By Brink, Lars
  42. Revising the WTO Measurement of Agricultural Price Support to Resolve the Impasse on Public Stockholding By Orden, David; Brink, Lars
  43. Estimating Costs of Protection for Agricultural Exports to Developing and Emerging Markets By Karagulle, Yunus Emre; Grant, Jason; He, Xi; Emlinger, Charlotte
  44. Who Takes the Land? Quantifying the Use of Built-Up Land by French Economic Sectors to Assess Their Vulnerability to the ‘No Net Land Take’ Policy By Etienne de L'Estoile; Mathilde Salin
  45. Pesticide Use, Maximum Residue Limitation and Fruit Export: An Application of ASEAN By Peng, Xue; Shen, Jinhu
  46. SPS Approval Procedures: Key Issues, Their Impact on Trade and Ways to Address Them By Deuss, Annelies; Laget, Edith
  47. Testing the GAEZ agronomic model in the fields:Evidence from Uganda By Bruno Morando
  48. Effect of Regional Intellectual Property Right on Global Value Chain By Oh, Saera; Awokuse, Titus
  49. Tariff Evasion in Agriculture: The Role of Non-tariff Measures By He, Xi
  50. The Time Varying Effect of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Agricultural Trade: Evidence from China By Zhuang, Xiting; Steinbach, Sandro
  51. What Matters for Agricultural Trade? Assessing the Role of Trade Deal Provisions using Machine Learning By Gordeev, Stepan; Jelliffe, Jeremy; Kim, Dongin; Steinbach, Sandro
  52. Food Waste Management via Insect Production in the Perspective of Circular Bioeconomy By Anna Maroušková
  53. The Pick of the Crop: Agricultural Practices and Clustered Networks in Village Economies By Andre Groeger; Yanos Zylberberg
  54. Are Commodity Exports a Road to Weaker Institutions? Causal Inference through a Natural Experiment By Lana, Victor; Costa, Lorena; Bornacki, Leonardo
  55. L’impact de l’inflation sur la distribution des gains de productivité de l’agriculture française By Jean-Philippe Boussemart; Salomé Kahindo; Raluca Parvulescu
  56. Improving Trade in Value Added (TiVA) Approach in Global Value Chain Analysis By Jone, Lin; Wang, Zhi
  57. A Cost Assessment of Tree Plantation Failure under Extreme Drought Events in France: What Role for Insurance? By Sandrine Brèteau-Amores; Marielle Brunette; Pablo Andrés-Domenech
  58. Economic Contribution of the Sugarbeet Industry in Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota By Bangsund, Dean A.; Hodur, Nancy M.
  59. Normalized Revealed Comparative Advantage and Destination-Specific Competitiveness of Major Pineapple Exporting Countries By Abdulai, Seidu; Sarker, Rakhal
  60. Global Value Chains, Economic Growth, and Income Inequality: Evidence from Africa By Nana, Ibrahim; Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul Jr.
  61. Specific Trade Concerns and Technical Barriers to Trade: evidence from a new database "When and who complain matters" By Benguin, Malo; Santeramo, Fabio G.
  62. Decomposing the Inflation Response to Weather-Related Disasters By Erwan Gautier; Christoph Grosse Steffen; Magali Marx; Paul Vertier
  63. Los vinos de alta gama clásicos en España By Vicente Pinilla
  64. The Evolutionary Trajectory of EU Trade in Algae for Human Consumption By Zarbá, Carla; Scuderi, Alessandro; Matarazzo, Agata; Privitera, Donatella; Pecorino, Biagio; Chinnici, Gaetano
  1. By: Dalheimer, Bernhard; Lim, Sunghun; Bellemare, Marc
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339441&r=agr
  2. By: Ahn, Soojung; Steinbach, Sandro
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339414&r=agr
  3. By: Afesorgbor, S. Kwaku; Kornher, Lukas; Santeramo, Fabio
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, Consumer/Household Economics, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339511&r=agr
  4. By: Beckman, Jayson; Dong, Fengxia; Ivanic, Maros
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Crop Production/Industries, Environmental Economics and Policy, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339548&r=agr
  5. By: Zheng, Yixing; Grant, Jason; Legrand, Nicolas; Arita, Shawn; Sydow, Sharon
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Agricultural Finance, Environmental Economics and Policy, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339490&r=agr
  6. By: Afesorgbor, Sylvanus Kwaku
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339472&r=agr
  7. By: Lin, Jessie; Johnson, Michael; Gale, Fred
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Crop Production/Industries, Demand and Price Analysis, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339526&r=agr
  8. By: Rudloff, Bettina; Wieck, Christine; Mensah, Kristina
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339532&r=agr
  9. By: Zereyesus, Yacob; Kee, Jennifer; Morgan, Stephen; Nava, Noe; Cardell, Lila
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339513&r=agr
  10. By: Gerval, Adam; Jelliffe, Jeremy; Johnson, William
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade, Livestock Production/Industries
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339534&r=agr
  11. By: Martin, Will; Minot, Nick
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339416&r=agr
  12. By: Bispo, Scarlett Queen Almeida; Silva, Fernanda Aparecida; Martins, Michelle Márcia Viana; Nonnenberg, Marcelo José Braga; Vianna, Ruan da Silva
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339560&r=agr
  13. By: Fiankor, Dela-Dem Doe; Dalheimer, Bernhard; Mack, Gabriele
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Environmental Economics and Policy, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339551&r=agr
  14. By: Lundberg, Clark; Hutson, Stephanie
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339435&r=agr
  15. By: Kenner, Bart; Russell, Dylan; Kaufman, James; Valdez, Constanza,; Wagner, Jake; Hossen, Deluair; Jessup, Eric; Muhammad, Andrew; Zhao, Mengshan
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339494&r=agr
  16. By: Sayre, James E
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339438&r=agr
  17. By: Beckman, Jayson; Ivanic, Maros
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339453&r=agr
  18. By: Engemann, Helena; Jafari, Yaghoob; Heckelei, Thomas; Latouche, Karine
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339504&r=agr
  19. By: Molly J Doruska; Christopher B Barrett; Jason R Rohr
    Abstract: Infectious disease can reduce labor productivity and incomes, trapping subpopulations in a vicious cycle of ill health and poverty. Efforts to boost African farmers' agricultural production through fertilizer use can inadvertently promote the growth of aquatic vegetation that hosts disease vectors. Recent trials established that removing aquatic vegetation habitat for snail intermediate hosts reduces schistosomiasis infection rates in children, while converting the harvested vegetation into compost boosts agricultural productivity and incomes. Our model illustrates how this ecological intervention changes the feedback between the human and natural systems, potentially freeing rural households from poverty-disease traps. We develop a bioeconomic model that interacts an analytical microeconomic model of agricultural households' behavior, health status and incomes over time with a dynamic model of schistosomiasis disease ecology. We calibrate the model with field data from northern Senegal. We show analytically and via simulation that local conversion of invasive aquatic vegetation to compost changes the feedbacks among interlinked disease, aquatic and agricultural systems, reducing schistosomiasis infection and increasing incomes relative to the current status quo, in which villagers rarely remove vegetation. Aquatic vegetation removal disrupts the poverty-disease trap by reducing habitat for snails that vector the infectious helminth and by promoting production of compost that returns to agricultural soils nutrients that currently leach into surface water from on-farm fertilizer applications. The result is healthier people, more productive labor, cleaner water, more productive agriculture, and higher incomes.
    Date: 2024–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2401.17384&r=agr
  20. By: Taglioni, Daria
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339463&r=agr
  21. By: Pierre Levasseur (SADAPT - Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement); François Mariotti (PNCA (UMR 0914) - Physiologie de la Nutrition et du Comportement Alimentaire - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement); Isabelle Denis (Laboratoire de nutrition et sécurité alimentaire - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique); Olga Davidenko (PNCA (UMR 0914) - Physiologie de la Nutrition et du Comportement Alimentaire - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
    Abstract: Abstract Regulation of meat consumption appears to be a relevant public policy to limit diet-related greenhouse gas emissions. However, the real impact of such a policy (e.g., tax) on human health and nutrition remains uncertain, especially for underprivileged individuals. Based on representative data from France, we estimate potential trend differences in the association between meat consumption and nutritional outcomes, such as body mass index (BMI) and unhealthy food intake, according to individual educational attainment. We reveal that among adults with low education levels, reduced meat consumption was significantly associated with a higher BMI, a higher risk of being overweight, and greater intake of ultra-processed foods, sweet drinks, and sugar. By contrast, reduced meat consumption was associated with healthier nutritional status for the most educated individuals. These results are robust to several measurements of socioeconomic status (SES) such as household income, occupation, and financial insecurity perception. In summary, high-SES individuals may be more prone to replace meat with healthy alternatives, whereas low-SES individuals may tend to replace meat with energy-dense foods and beverages, including ultra-processed foods. In terms of the contribution to science and society, this study is the first to show that SES changes the relationship between meat consumption and nutritional outcomes. Our findings call for future research on this topic to provide actionable recommendations to implement a fair and healthy food transition.
    Keywords: Body mass index, Overweight, Diet quality, Meat Socioeconomic status Body mass index Overweight Diet quality, Meat, Socioeconomic status
    Date: 2024–01–30
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04426863&r=agr
  22. By: Feinberg, Robert M.; Nes, Kjersti; Reynolds, Kara M.; Schaefer, K. Aleks
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339509&r=agr
  23. By: Grant, Jason; Legrand, Nicolas; Bolub, Alla; Arita, Shawn; Sydow, Sharon
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339496&r=agr
  24. By: Zhu, Xiaoyu; Barichello, Richard; Vercammen, James
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Agricultural Finance, Consumer/Household Economics
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339508&r=agr
  25. By: Zorbas, Christina; Resnick, Danielle; Jones, Eleanor; Suri, Shoba; Iruhiriye, Elyse; Headey, Derek D.; Martin, Will; Vos, Rob; Arndt, Channing; Menon, Purnima
    Abstract: Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG 2), Zero Hunger, by 2030 is in jeopardy due to slowing and unequal economic growth, climate shocks, the COVID-19 pandemic, conflict, lackluster efforts toward investing in food system sustainability and agricultural productivity growth, and persistent barriers to open food trade. Nevertheless, numerous commitments to achieving SDG 2 have been repeatedly expressed by Heads of State and Ministers at diverse global meetings since the SDGs became a focus in 2015. To identify the intensity and degree of convergence of commitments that national governments have collectively made to realizing SDG 2, this paper provides a qualitative assessment of statements from more than 68 global meetings and 107 intergovernmental commitment documents since 2015. Analyzing these commitments against seven critical factors necessary for impact at scale, we find that stated intentions to solve the global food security and hunger challenge have become more pronounced at global meetings over time, especially in the wake of the crises. However, the intent to act is not consistently matched by commitments to specific actions that could help accelerate reductions in hunger. For instance, while increased financing is often recognized as a priority to reach SDG 2, few commitments in global fora relate to detailed costing of required investments. Similarly, many commitment statements lack specificity regarding what and how policy interventions should be scaled up for greater action on SDG 2 or the ways to enhance different stakeholders’ capacities to implement them. While horizontal coherence was mentioned across most global fora, it was only present in about half of the commitment statements, with even less recognition of the necessity for vertical coherence from global to local levels. Despite global acknowledgement of the importance of accountability and monitoring, usually by way of progress reports, we find few consequences for governments that do not act on commitments made in global fora. We discuss the implications of these findings and offer recommendations for how to strengthen the commitment-making process to help accelerate actions that can reduce food insecurity and hunger and augment the legitimacy of global meetings. This work can inform the policy advocacy community focused on SDG 2 and those engaged in catalyzing and supporting intergovernmental action on other SDGs. Our findings reiterate the importance of attention to global governance and the political economy of global meetings—which is necessary to strengthen our focus on delivering outcomes that put the world on a path that brings the solution to the problems of global hunger and food insecurity within reach.
    Keywords: food security; diet; accountability; food policies; hunger; governance; nutrition
    Date: 2024
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2238&r=agr
  26. By: Monteferrante, Eduardo; Lopes, Willian; Miranda, Silvia
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339483&r=agr
  27. By: Hossen, Deluair; Muhammad, Andrew; Steinbach, Sandro
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Crop Production/Industries, Farm Management, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339541&r=agr
  28. By: Sabala, Ethan; Davis, Eric
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339429&r=agr
  29. By: Countryman, Amanda M.; Litvinov, Valentyn; Kolodiazhnyi, Ivan; Bogonos, Mariia; Nivievskyi, Oleg
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Farm Management, Financial Economics, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339542&r=agr
  30. By: Sauer, Christine; Reardon, Tom
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339446&r=agr
  31. By: Steinbach, Sandro; Zhuang, Xiting
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339419&r=agr
  32. By: Feemstra, Robert; Hong, Chang
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339428&r=agr
  33. By: Devadoss, Stephen; Ridley, Wililam
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339413&r=agr
  34. By: Woo, Sunghwi; Thompson, Wyatt
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339434&r=agr
  35. By: Kim, Dongin
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339469&r=agr
  36. By: Barichello, Rick
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339418&r=agr
  37. By: Kornher, Lukas; Sakyi, Daniel; Tannor, Linus Linnaeus
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339492&r=agr
  38. By: Emlinger, Charlotte; Latouche, Karine
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339444&r=agr
  39. By: Reardon, Tom; Awokuse, Titus
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339407&r=agr
  40. By: Johnson, Will; Zeng, Wendy
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339415&r=agr
  41. By: Brink, Lars
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339431&r=agr
  42. By: Orden, David; Brink, Lars
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339432&r=agr
  43. By: Karagulle, Yunus Emre; Grant, Jason; He, Xi; Emlinger, Charlotte
    Keywords: Agribusiness, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339556&r=agr
  44. By: Etienne de L'Estoile; Mathilde Salin
    Abstract: In 2021, the French Parliament passed a law aiming for "No net land take" (NNLT) by 2050, while the rate of land take should be halved by 2031. These objectives are notably justified by the fact that land take, defined as the conversion of agricultural, forest and other semi-natural and natural land into built-up land, causes biodiversity loss and affects soil functions. Because they contribute to land take and use built-up land to produce, economic sectors will likely be affected by this new policy. This paper investigates this exposure. Using cadastral data and geolocated information on French firms, we develop accounts tracing the annual use of built-up land (a stock) and the annual land take (a flow) by economic sectors over 2008-2021. Our results show a strong time-varying sectoral heterogeneity regarding land use and land take, with some sectors (e.g. wholesale and retail trade, manufacturing or accommodation and food services) being significant users of built-up land. Regarding land take, we find that wholesale and retail trade has had the greatest responsibility. Then, we combine these new accounts with additional data and propose a multi-criteria analysis to assess the vulnerability of each sector in a ‘severe but plausible’ scenario of increasing land prices induced by the NNLT policy. Our results show that the sectors contributing most significantly to land take may not necessarily be the most vulnerable because of their relatively higher adaptive capacity.
    Keywords: Land Use Regulations; Real Estate Markets; Land; Environmental Accounts; Production
    JEL: R52 R33 Q24 Q56 E23
    Date: 2024
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bfr:banfra:941&r=agr
  45. By: Peng, Xue; Shen, Jinhu
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339443&r=agr
  46. By: Deuss, Annelies; Laget, Edith
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339442&r=agr
  47. By: Bruno Morando (Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, Maynooth University.)
    Abstract: The Global Agroecological Zones (GAEZ) model developed by FAO and IIASA provides granular crop-specific expected yields worldwide. An increasing number of papers in economics are using this dataset for a number of different purposes, such as deriving an exogenous source of variations in institutions or to parametrize computable general equilibrium models of trade in agricultural goods. However, as pointed out by the GAEZ creators, its results †should be treated in a conservative manner and at appropriate aggregation levels, which are commensurate with the resolution of the basic data†. In this paper, I †test†the GAEZ predicted yields by comparing them with the ones measured through agricultural surveys †in the fields†. In particular, I use data from two different agricultural surveys in Uganda, where farmers typically grow a multitude of crops. In both instances, I find that GAEZ predictions often correlate negatively with yields, and that farmers’ crop choices are more responsive to survey-based yields than to GAEZ’s predictions. These findings suggest that, at least in the context of Uganda, predicted GAEZ yields fail to make reliable predictions at the granular level.
    Keywords: GAEZ, Agriculture, Crop Choice, Uganda
    JEL: O55 Q10 R14
    Date: 2024
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:may:mayecw:n320-24.pdf&r=agr
  48. By: Oh, Saera; Awokuse, Titus
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339440&r=agr
  49. By: He, Xi
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339424&r=agr
  50. By: Zhuang, Xiting; Steinbach, Sandro
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339423&r=agr
  51. By: Gordeev, Stepan; Jelliffe, Jeremy; Kim, Dongin; Steinbach, Sandro
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339533&r=agr
  52. By: Anna Maroušková (Department of Regional Management and Law, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia In České Budějovice)
    Abstract: The amount of different types of waste around the world is growing every year. Especially a growing amount of food waste is in desperate need of better management practices. At the same time, European Union (EU) is striving for becoming the world's first climate-neutral continent which requires immediate solutions for issues like waste management, sustainable production, competitive resource-efficient business models, etc. For achieving these goals, business models fulfilling principles of circular bioeconomy are highly supported by the EU. One of such business models could be the rearing of Black Soldier Larvae (BSF) on various types of biowaste and their use for value-added products like animal feed, fertilizers, biofuel, cosmetic ingredients, etc. This study reviews adopted Bioeconomy strategies and investigates the state of the research and development in the field of BSF rearing through statistical analysis of the available scientific publications, published patents, and established companies in the EU and European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Member states. The results show an exponential increase in all three indicators in the last decade.
    Keywords: bioeconomy, biowaste, circular economy, insect production, sustainability
    JEL: O13 Q01 Q57
    Date: 2023–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:boh:wpaper:02_2023&r=agr
  53. By: Andre Groeger; Yanos Zylberberg
    Abstract: This paper studies how social networks (might fail to) shape agricultural practices. We exploit (i) a unique census of agricultural production nested within delineated land parcels and (ii) comprehensive social network data within four repopulated villages of rural Vietnam. In a first step, we extract exogenous variation in network formation from home locations within the few streets that compose each village (populated through staggered population resettlement), and we estimate the return to social links in the adoption of highly-productive crops. We find a large network multiplier, in apparent contradiction with lowadoption rates. In a second step, we study the structure of network formation to explain this puzzle: social networks display large homophily, and valuable links between heterogeneous households are rare. Due to the clustered nature of networks and the dynamic, endogenous propagation of agricultural practices, there are decreasing returns to social links, and policies targeting “inbetweeners” are most able to mitigate this issue.
    Keywords: technology adoption, social networks
    JEL: D85 O13
    Date: 2024–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bge:wpaper:1426&r=agr
  54. By: Lana, Victor; Costa, Lorena; Bornacki, Leonardo
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339480&r=agr
  55. By: Jean-Philippe Boussemart (Univ. Lille, CNRS, IESEG School of Management, UMR 9221 – LEM, F-59000, France); Salomé Kahindo (IESEG School of Management, Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9221 – LEM, F-59000, France); Raluca Parvulescu (IESEG School of Management, Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9221 – LEM, F-59000, France)
    Abstract: It is imperative to consider the impact of monetary erosion when examining the distribution of productivity gains through variations in the prices of inputs and outputs within the agricultural sector. In this study, we will utilize productivity surplus accounts to comprehensively analyze how monetary erosion affects the allocation of price advantages among stakeholders involved in agricultural production. In light of the current backdrop of resurging general inflation and a reversal in food price trends, we then present an empirical analysis of productivity gains in the French agriculture sector spanning from 1959 to 2022. Our objective is to precisely assess how inflation affects the distribution of the productivity surplus among the various participants in the process, including customers, farmers, suppliers, the government, landowners, financial institutions, and others.
    Keywords: total factor productivity, surplus account, inflation, agriculture
    Date: 2024–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ies:wpaper:e202403&r=agr
  56. By: Jone, Lin; Wang, Zhi
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339467&r=agr
  57. By: Sandrine Brèteau-Amores (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement); Marielle Brunette (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement); Pablo Andrés-Domenech (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
    Abstract: Research Highlights: We analyze the costs of plantation failure and evaluate the distribution of replantation costs and risk sharing between the forestry company and the forest owner in France. Background and Objectives: Due to the lack of a clear definition of drought, forestry companies are increasingly considered as liable for plantation failure, increasing their costs and leading to financial instability. In this context, this paper aims to address the following questions. In the case of plantation failure, is it less costly to replant, not replant, or restart the whole plantation? What is the impact of changing the liability scheme between the company and the forest owner in terms of replantation costs and risk sharing? Materials and Methods: We performed a cost assessment of different itineraries of plantations as a function of different mortality rates. The breakdown of the replantation costs between the company and the forest owner was also investigated. Results: No replanting is the least expensive option for the forest owner, followed by replanting and then by starting the whole plantation anew. Reducing the company's liability is an interesting option to reduce its exposure to risk. Conclusions: Modifications of the company's liability allows for the inclusion of private insurance contracts against plantation failure.
    Keywords: Forest, Regeneration, Plantation, Drought, Insurance, Costs
    Date: 2023–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03998594&r=agr
  58. By: Bangsund, Dean A.; Hodur, Nancy M.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Crop Production/Industries, Demand and Price Analysis
    Date: 2024–02–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:nddaae:339741&r=agr
  59. By: Abdulai, Seidu; Sarker, Rakhal
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339458&r=agr
  60. By: Nana, Ibrahim; Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul Jr.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339408&r=agr
  61. By: Benguin, Malo; Santeramo, Fabio G.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural Finance, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2022–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats22:339425&r=agr
  62. By: Erwan Gautier; Christoph Grosse Steffen; Magali Marx; Paul Vertier
    Abstract: This paper provides empirical evidence on the compositional effect of weather-related disasters on consumer prices. We combine data on monthly granular inflation for 12 CPI product categories with data on extreme weather events for four French overseas territories sporadically hit by large weather-related disasters. We find that disasters lead to a maximum rise in consumer prices of 0.5 percent with substantial heterogeneity in the price response. An immediate strong surge in the prices of food, and notably of fresh products, is partially offset by a decline in the prices of manufactured products and services. The effects of weather-related disasters dissipate after four months and differ along the income distribution, notably raising inflation for low-income households by more. Price controls dampen the price response on impact, but lead to similar adjustments in the price level after six months.
    Keywords: Natural Disasters; Extreme Weather; Inflation; Disaggregate Inflation; Inequality; Price Gouging
    JEL: E31 Q54
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bfr:banfra:935&r=agr
  63. By: Vicente Pinilla
    Abstract: This chapter first studies the emergence of the first wineries producing premium wines in Spain in the second half of the 19th century. It then follows the evolution of this type of production during a period in which it did not manage to expand appreciably and which lasted until approximately the seventies of the twentieth century. Finally, the definitive consolidation of premium wines since the 1980s is examined. Special attention is paid to explaining how, during much of the period analyzed, neither the domestic nor the foreign market was favorable to the production of quality wines. In this context, the extraordinary adventure of a handful of innovators who did not settle for what was already in place and explored new avenues in winemaking stands out. The French influence on them, through various channels, has been highlighted.
    Keywords: premium wines, spanish wines, wine production
    JEL: N53 N54 L66 Q13
    Date: 2024–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:seh:wpaper:2401&r=agr
  64. By: Zarbá, Carla; Scuderi, Alessandro; Matarazzo, Agata; Privitera, Donatella; Pecorino, Biagio; Chinnici, Gaetano
    Keywords: Consumer/Household Economics, International Relations/Trade
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iats23:339520&r=agr
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.
This page is being maintained by Thomas Krichel. It was last updated on 2024‒05‒02 at 13:06.