nep-agr New Economics Papers
on Agricultural Economics
Issue of 2022‒08‒22
85 papers chosen by
  1. Impacts of Climate Change and Agricultural Diversification on Agricultural Production Value of Thai Farm Households By Benjapon Prommawin; Nattanun Svavasu; Spol Tanpraphan; Voravee Saengavut; Theepakorn Jithitikulchai; Witsanu Attavanich; Bruce A. McCarl
  2. The impact of countercyclical farm programs on agricultural land values By Callahan, Scott; Ifft, Jennifer; Michaud, Clayton P.
  3. Investigating the financial impact of extreme weather on Midwestern farmers By Sajid, Osama; Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel; Ifft, Jennifer
  4. Climate change and water pollution: the impact of exteme rain on nutrient runoff in Wisconsin By Skidmore, Marin; Foltz, Jeremy D.; Andarge, Tihitina
  5. The Impact of Climate Change on Labor Allocation in Rural China By Liu, Dong; Feng, Xiaolong; SI, Wei; Zhao, Qiran
  6. Estimation of crop yield density conditional on input choices for smallholder farms using a BetaIV framework By Shukla, Sumedha; Arora, Gaurav; Agarwal, Sandip K.
  7. Does Crop Insurance Participation Impact Quality-Adjusted Pesticide Usage? By Biram, Hunter D.; Tack, Jesse; Nehring, Richard F.
  8. Assessing Food Security in the Post-COVID-19 Period: Empirical Evidence from India By Bairagi, Subir K.; Mishra, Ashok K.; Zereyesus, Yacob A.
  9. What is the value of crop insurance for Nebraskan farmers? By Rocha, Jr., Adauto B.; Fulginiti, Lilyan E.; Perrin, Richard K.; Walters, Cory G.
  10. Availability of Healthy Diets in 174 Countries, 1961-2019: A Food System Assessment By Costlow, Leah; Herforth, Anna; Masters, William A.
  11. IFAD Research Series 79: The position of export crops banana and cocoa in food systems analysis with special reference to the role of certification schemes By Alho, Carlos F.B.V.; da Silva, Amanda F.; Hendriks, Chantal M.J.; Stoorvogel, Jetse J.; Oosterveer, Peter J.M.; Smaling, Eric M.A.
  12. Is Fish a Substitute or Compliment for Meat? A Broadscale Study of China’s Animal-Derived Food Consumption By Wang,, Zhina; Li, Wenying; Chen, Xuan; Li, Li
  13. Conservation Practices and Corn Yields in Mississippi and Arkansas Delta By Yun, Seong; Pinamang, Melody; Gramig, Ben; Interis, Matthew G.
  14. Water Resources, Public Investment, and Agricultural Productivity in Pakistan By Ali, Muhammad Tahir; Fulginiti, Lilyan E.; Perrin, Richard K.
  15. Extreme Heat and Agricultural TFP: The Case of Nigerian Subsistence Agriculture By Mayorga, Joaquin; Mishra, Ashok K.; Aveiga, Alexis H. Villacis
  16. The Effect of Digital Finance Use on Savings Amount: Evidence from Ghanaian Smallholder Farmers By Possner, Annkathrin; Rosero, Gabriel; Musshoff, Oliver
  17. Do small farmers benefit from participating in producer companies? – Evidence from Telangana, India By John, Jannet; Ghosh, Ranjan; Vemireddy, Vidya; Lagerkvist, Carl Johan
  18. Land tenure and conservation adoption: An analysis of contracts and incentives By Burnett, Wesley; Szmurlo, Daniel; Callahan, Scott
  19. The impact of the regulatory debate on glyphosate in the EU on publicly traded pesticides producers By Koppenberg, Maximilian; Hirsch, Stefan; Finger, Robert
  20. Loan Survival: Are Socially Disadvantaged Farmers More Likely to Default? By Vekemans, Marie-Cecile; Short, Gianna; Dodson, Charles B.; Ahrendsen, Bruce L.
  21. Efficiency and Equity of Posted Price Markets for Irrigation Water By Jeong, Dawoon; Sesmero, Juan Pablo; Reeling, Carson
  22. Food systems transformation and changing demand for animal proteins: Evidence from Nigeria By Parkhi, Charuta M.; Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda; Reardon, Thomas A.
  23. The Effects of Increased Weather Volatility on Agricultural Trade By Gammans, Matthew; Nes, Kjersti; Schaefer, K. Aleks; Scheitrum, Dan
  24. Crop index insurance for more welfare and climate resilience? An experimental approach By Moritz, Laura; Kuhn, Lena; Bobojonov, Ihtiyor
  25. Demand for Food Attributes Linked to Production Practices during COVID-19: Evidence from a Large Sample of U.S. Carrot Buyers By Lee, Hanbin; Sumner, Daniel A.; Goldstein, Robin
  26. How the Framing of Food Waste Impacts Consumers’ Perception and Measurement of Perceived Household Food Waste. By Gabrielyan, Gnel; Ruiz, Raquel Diaz; Just, David R.
  27. Economic Incentives for Robotic Weed Control in Row Crop Agriculture By Yu, Chengzheng; Khanna, Madhu; Atallah, Shadi S.; Kar, Saurajyoti
  28. Holistically Examining the Environmental and Economic Benefits of Conservation Agriculture Adoption in the South African Wheat Production: A Stepwise Life Cycle Analysis Approach By Mulimbi, Willy; Nalley, Lawton Lanier
  29. Assessment of the economic viability of grass-fed beef production in the Northeastern U.S. By Ge, Houtian; Gomez, Miguel I.; Peters, Christian
  30. Disorderly Markets: Milk Price Regulations Alter U.S. Inter-Regional Trade in Milk and Increase U.S. Production of Internationally Tradable Dairy Products By Hanon, Tristan M.; Sumner, Daniel A.
  31. Agricultural Trade Costs in 21st Century: New Evidence By Karagulle, Yunus Emre; Emlinger, Charlotte; Grant, Jason
  32. Efficient Regulation of Hemp Pollen Dispersal in Variated Landscapes By Wang, Ming; Mooney, Daniel F.; Hill, Rebecca; Mark, Tyler B.
  33. Understanding Public Preferences for Shellfish Aquaculture Expansion: The Role of Production Technology and Environmental Impacts By Farolfi, Giulio; Johnston, Robert J.
  34. Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Methods for Causal Inference in Agricultural Economics By Badruddoza, Syed; Fuad, Syed M.; Amin, Modhurima
  35. Uncover Drivers Influencing Consumers' WTP Using Machine Learning: Case of Organic Coffee in Taiwan By Man-, ZuyiKeunZuyi Wang; Takagi, Chifumi; Kim, Man-Keun; Chung, Anh
  36. Is gamification a curse or blessing for the design of risk elicitation methods in the field? Experimental evidence from Cambodian smallholder farmers By Bruns, Selina JK; Hermann, Daniel; Musshoff, Oliver
  37. Combining Stated and Revealed Preferences for valuing Organic Chicken Meat By Gschwandtner, Adelina; Ribeiro, Jose Eduardo; Revoredo-Giha, Cesar; Burton, Michael
  38. A rank similarity test for quantile treatment effects in conjunction with propensity score matching: An application to heterogeneous crop yield impacts of agricultural credit By Shukla, Sumedha; Arora, Gaurav
  39. Feminization of agriculture and the trade-offs to human energy requirements: Evidence from rural India By Afeni, Oluwatosin Temitope; Zanello, Giacomo; Srinivasan, Chittur S.
  40. Enrollment Restrictions and the Adoption of Conservation Practices in the U.S. Corn Belt By Wan, Xiaolan; Howard, Gregory; Zhang, Wendong
  41. COMPARING MARKET EFFICIENCY BENCHMARKS:EVIDENCE FROM HOG MARKETS IN CHINA ANDTHE EU. A METAFRONTIER APPROACH By Mu, Yali; Dalheimer, Bernhard; Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan Von
  42. Impact of Extreme Weather Disasters on Global Soybean Markets and China's Soybean Imports By Hu, Xinran; Zhang, Yumei; Chen, Kevin; Fan, Shenggen
  43. Risk preferences, productive investment and straw return technology adoption by farmers in China By Mao, Hui; Quan, Yurong; Fu, Yong; Chen, Shaojian
  44. The Determinants of Plant-Based Meat Consumption in the United States By Palash, Prokash D.; Li, Wenying; Zhao, Shuoli
  45. Smallholder Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Quality Legume Seeds: Implications for the Commercial Viability of Local Farm Seed Enterprises in Myanmar By Win, Myat Thida; Maredia, Mywish K.; Boughton, Duncan H.
  46. An Exploration of Preferences for Soil Health Practices in Potato Production By Maas, Alexander S.; McIntosh, Christopher S.; Fuller, Kate B.
  47. Contract Non-compliance and Moral Hazard: Evidence from Cost-share Programs in Louisiana, USA. By Pathak, Santosh; Wang, Hua; Adusumilli, Naveen C.
  48. Sales-Weighted Online Agricultural Commodity Price Index: Using Sales and Price Data web-scraped from Online Grocery Stores in South Korea By Kim, Yong J.; Jung, Jinho; Kim, Sanghyo
  49. Hoggin' the Road: Negative Road Externalities of Pork Slaughterhouses By Blemings, Benjamin T.; Bock, Margaret; Scarcioffolo, Alexandre
  50. Payments and Penalties in Ecosystem Services Programs By Kim, Youngho; Lichtenberg, Erik; Newburn, David
  51. Intensive or Extensive Margin Effects? Growers’ Responses to the Restriction of High-Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Pesticide Products in the San Joaquin Valley, California By Zheng, Yanan; Goodhue, Rachael E.
  52. Inferring the Supply of GHG Abatement from Agricultural Lands By Manning, Dale; Rad, Mani Rouhi; Ogle, Stephen; Mansfield, David
  53. Guaranteed Storage? Risk and Credit Constraints in the Demand for Postharvest Technology and Rice Seed Storage Decisions in Bangladesh By Schwab, Benjamin; Yu, Jisang
  54. The Public Health Costs from Antimicrobial Resistance in Ten Common Pathogens By Toran, Katherine; Lanthier, Michael; Estrin, Andrew J.
  55. IFAD Research Series 82: Contributions of information and communication technologies to food systems transformation By Ceccarelli, Tomaso; Kannan, Samyuktha; Cecchi, Francesco; Janssen, Sander
  56. Aligning Values to Labels: A Best-Worst Analysis of Food Labels By McLeod, Alexandria N.; Yang, Wei; Fang, Di; Nayga, Rodolfo M. Jr.
  57. Taking into account affordable and healthy diets: Implications for sustainable development By Wang, Xiaoxi; Cai, Hao; Xuan, Jiaqi
  58. Using Psychographic Data to Study Differences in Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Fruits and Vegetables Consumption Across Income Groups: A Bayesian Approach By Priestley, Samuel L.; Valizadeh, Pourya
  59. IFAD Research Series 78: The Small and Medium Enterprises’ quiet revolution in the hidden middle of food systems in developing regions By Reardon, Thomas; Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda; Minten, Bart
  60. Exploring the Differential Impacts of SNAP Policies on Program Caseload: A Staggered Difference-in-Differences Approach By Wang, Xingguo; Valizadeh, Pourya; Bryant, Henry L.
  61. Consumer Preferences for Plant-Based Meat Alternatives in China?The Role of Information By Wang, Hongsha; Chen, Qihui; Zhu, Chen
  62. Optimal Beef Cow Culling Strategies in the Southeastern U.S.: A Dynamic Linear Programming Framework By Erol, Erdal; Dillon, Carl R.; Burdine, Kenneth H.
  63. Neighborhood effects, urbanization, and agricultural commercialization in South India By Steinhübel, Linda; Wegmann, Johannes; Jose, Monish
  64. Farmland sales under return and price uncertainty By Odening, Martin; Plogmann, Jana; Musshoff, Oliver; Ritter, Matthias
  65. How do input subsidy programs affect smallholder households’ dietary diversity? Evidence from Zambia By Kwon, Daye; Myers, Robert J.; Mason, Nicole M.
  66. Economics of Field Size for Autonomous Crop Machines By Abdullah Al-Amin, A.K.M; Lowenberg‑DeBoer, James; Franklin, K.; Behrendt, K.
  67. Exploring the Relationship between Stocks of Community Wealth and the Intensity of Farm to School Program Activities By Kashyap, Pratyoosh; Jablonski, Becca B.R.; Bauman, Allison
  68. Economics of Field Size for Autonomous Crop Machines By Abdullah Al-Amin, A.K.M; Lowenberg‑DeBoer, James; Franklin, K.; Behrendt, K.
  69. Recurrent Event Survival Analysis of Repeated Food Recalls: Some Insights from the U.S By Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.; Pozo, Veronica F.; Thomas, Briana
  70. Heterogeneity in Consumer Food Stockpiling and Retailer Experiences During Hurricane Sandy By Simandjuntak, Daniel P.; Jaenicke, Edward C.; Wrenn, Douglas H.
  71. Estimating Supply Elasticities for Corn in the United States: Accounting for Prospective Plantings By Goyal, Raghav; Adjemian, Michael K.; Secor, William
  72. Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Spatial Market Integration of Aquatic Product in China By Wang, Yutian; Chen, Xuan; Shi, Longzhong
  73. Reviewing the costs, benefits, and resilience impacts of mixed farming and agroforestry systems on value chains By Low, Guy; Dalhaus, Tobias; Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.
  74. Food Safety Standards and the Duration of Trade Relations By Engemann, Helena; Jafari, Yaghoob; Heckelei, Thomas
  75. Banking Efficiency Analysis for U.S. agricultural and non-agricultural banks: Comparative Period Analysis between the Great Recession of the late 2000s and the Current Pandemic conditions By Gao, Penghui; Secor, William; Escalante, Cesar L.
  76. Paying Forest Owners for Environmental Services: Potential and Challenges BIOECOSYS, Lisbon, December 6 2021 By Jens Abildtrup
  77. Effect of Adopting Blockchain on the U.S Beef Industry Structure: A cost theory perspective By Mohammadi, Mati; Gray, Allan W.; Brewer, Brady E.
  78. POTENTIAL FACTORS INFLUENCING GOAT MEAT CONSUMPTION IN OKLAHOMA: AN ECONOMETRIC APPROACH By Silva, Nirodha De; Whittaker, Wesley; Chidmi, Benaissa
  79. A framework for assessing the governance efficiency of agricultural farms By Bachev, Hrabrin
  80. Do U.S. consumers value genetically modified farmed salmon? By Zheng, Qiujie; Nayga, Rodolfo M. Jr.; Yang, Wei; Tokunaga, Kanae
  81. Forced migration and food crises By Federico Carril-Caccia; Jordi Paniagua; Marta Suarez-Varela
  82. Food Safety Halo Effect of Eco-labels By Lim, Kar Ho; Ojha, Renu; Nayga, Rodolfo M. Jr.; Sullivan, Pauline
  83. Labor Elasticities, Market Failures, and Misallocation: Evidence from Indian Agriculture By Merfeld, Joshua D.
  84. The Effect of Social Capital on Food Security Household Head Gender Gap By Silva, Andres Montes; Astorga, Andres; Fau´ndez, Rodrigo; Santos, Karla
  85. The Healthfulness and Mix of Foods Purchased at Dollar Stores, 2008-2019 By Feng, Wenhui; Page, Elina T.; Sun, Bangyao; Cash, Sean B.
  1. By: Benjapon Prommawin; Nattanun Svavasu; Spol Tanpraphan; Voravee Saengavut; Theepakorn Jithitikulchai; Witsanu Attavanich; Bruce A. McCarl
    Abstract: Climate change has caused widespread alterations in the environment and agricultural production. This paper investigates how higher temperature impacts agricultural production value of Thai farmers and the potential adaptation through diversification strategies. We use historical weather data coupled with farm household socioeconomic survey data to carry out econometric regression analysis and perform projections from the IPCC AR6 scenarios. We find that higher temperature reduces agricultural output value and that this will be worse as the planet keeps warmer. We also find that households engaged in diversified production activities are better adapted to higher temperature. The adaptation outcomes increase with access to irrigation and smaller farm size. Our findings support the country’s policies to encourage integrated farming and diversified crop-mixes strategies for Thai farmers.
    Keywords: climate change; Agricultural diversification; Agricultural households; Cimate resiliencer; Irrigation; Sustainable development
    JEL: Q12 Q54 O13 O44
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pui:dpaper:184&r=
  2. By: Callahan, Scott; Ifft, Jennifer; Michaud, Clayton P.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Agricultural Finance, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322579&r=
  3. By: Sajid, Osama; Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel; Ifft, Jennifer
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Environmental Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322341&r=
  4. By: Skidmore, Marin; Foltz, Jeremy D.; Andarge, Tihitina
    Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy, Resource/Energy Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322113&r=
  5. By: Liu, Dong; Feng, Xiaolong; SI, Wei; Zhao, Qiran
    Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy, Consumer/Household Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322388&r=
  6. By: Shukla, Sumedha; Arora, Gaurav; Agarwal, Sandip K.
    Keywords: Production Economics, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322580&r=
  7. By: Biram, Hunter D.; Tack, Jesse; Nehring, Richard F.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Production Economics, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322136&r=
  8. By: Bairagi, Subir K.; Mishra, Ashok K.; Zereyesus, Yacob A.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, International Development, Community/Rural/Urban Development
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322118&r=
  9. By: Rocha, Jr., Adauto B.; Fulginiti, Lilyan E.; Perrin, Richard K.; Walters, Cory G.
    Keywords: Production Economics, Agricultural and Food Policy, Productivity Analysis
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322529&r=
  10. By: Costlow, Leah; Herforth, Anna; Masters, William A.
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural and Food Policy, International Development
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322254&r=
  11. By: Alho, Carlos F.B.V.; da Silva, Amanda F.; Hendriks, Chantal M.J.; Stoorvogel, Jetse J.; Oosterveer, Peter J.M.; Smaling, Eric M.A.
    Abstract: Food system analysis is used to understand relations between the production, distribution, and consumption of agricultural products. Many export commodities commodities are facing “consumer concerns” and certification requirement issues. In this paper, the certification requirements and schemes of two export commodities—banana and cocoa—are discussed using food system analysis. The “inclusiveness” of the food system, in terms of living wage, is also discussed.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Farm Management
    Date: 2022–06–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:unadrs:322000&r=
  12. By: Wang,, Zhina; Li, Wenying; Chen, Xuan; Li, Li
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Marketing, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322292&r=
  13. By: Yun, Seong; Pinamang, Melody; Gramig, Ben; Interis, Matthew G.
    Keywords: Production Economics, Productivity Analysis, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322545&r=
  14. By: Ali, Muhammad Tahir; Fulginiti, Lilyan E.; Perrin, Richard K.
    Keywords: Production Economics, Resource/Energy Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322284&r=
  15. By: Mayorga, Joaquin; Mishra, Ashok K.; Aveiga, Alexis H. Villacis
    Keywords: Production Economics, Community/Rural/Urban Development, International Development
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322527&r=
  16. By: Possner, Annkathrin; Rosero, Gabriel; Musshoff, Oliver
    Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban Development, International Development, Agricultural Finance
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322177&r=
  17. By: John, Jannet; Ghosh, Ranjan; Vemireddy, Vidya; Lagerkvist, Carl Johan
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Agribusiness, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322135&r=
  18. By: Burnett, Wesley; Szmurlo, Daniel; Callahan, Scott
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Agricultural and Food Policy, Institutional and Behavioral Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322244&r=
  19. By: Koppenberg, Maximilian; Hirsch, Stefan; Finger, Robert
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Agricultural Finance, Agribusiness
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322214&r=
  20. By: Vekemans, Marie-Cecile; Short, Gianna; Dodson, Charles B.; Ahrendsen, Bruce L.
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322105&r=
  21. By: Jeong, Dawoon; Sesmero, Juan Pablo; Reeling, Carson
    Keywords: Resource/Energy Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322406&r=
  22. By: Parkhi, Charuta M.; Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda; Reardon, Thomas A.
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, International Development, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322594&r=
  23. By: Gammans, Matthew; Nes, Kjersti; Schaefer, K. Aleks; Scheitrum, Dan
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, International Development, Agribusiness
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322305&r=
  24. By: Moritz, Laura; Kuhn, Lena; Bobojonov, Ihtiyor
    Keywords: Institutional and Behavioral Economics, Risk and Uncertainty, Agricultural Finance
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322096&r=
  25. By: Lee, Hanbin; Sumner, Daniel A.; Goldstein, Robin
    Keywords: Marketing, Agricultural and Food Policy, Agribusiness
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322332&r=
  26. By: Gabrielyan, Gnel; Ruiz, Raquel Diaz; Just, David R.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Consumer/Household Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322353&r=
  27. By: Yu, Chengzheng; Khanna, Madhu; Atallah, Shadi S.; Kar, Saurajyoti
    Keywords: Productivity Analysis, Environmental Economics and Policy, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322149&r=
  28. By: Mulimbi, Willy; Nalley, Lawton Lanier
    Keywords: International Development, Resource/Energy Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322412&r=
  29. By: Ge, Houtian; Gomez, Miguel I.; Peters, Christian
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Production Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322487&r=
  30. By: Hanon, Tristan M.; Sumner, Daniel A.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, International Relations/Trade, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322600&r=
  31. By: Karagulle, Yunus Emre; Emlinger, Charlotte; Grant, Jason
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, International Development, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322575&r=
  32. By: Wang, Ming; Mooney, Daniel F.; Hill, Rebecca; Mark, Tyler B.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Environmental Economics and Policy, Production Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322494&r=
  33. By: Farolfi, Giulio; Johnston, Robert J.
    Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy, Community/Rural/Urban Development
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322131&r=
  34. By: Badruddoza, Syed; Fuad, Syed M.; Amin, Modhurima
    Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322452&r=
  35. By: Man-, ZuyiKeunZuyi Wang; Takagi, Chifumi; Kim, Man-Keun; Chung, Anh
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Marketing, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322150&r=
  36. By: Bruns, Selina JK; Hermann, Daniel; Musshoff, Oliver
    Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Risk and Uncertainty, Community/Rural/Urban Development
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322263&r=
  37. By: Gschwandtner, Adelina; Ribeiro, Jose Eduardo; Revoredo-Giha, Cesar; Burton, Michael
    Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy, Marketing, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322064&r=
  38. By: Shukla, Sumedha; Arora, Gaurav
    Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Agricultural and Food Policy, Agricultural Finance
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322569&r=
  39. By: Afeni, Oluwatosin Temitope; Zanello, Giacomo; Srinivasan, Chittur S.
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Consumer/Household Economics, Health Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322132&r=
  40. By: Wan, Xiaolan; Howard, Gregory; Zhang, Wendong
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Environmental Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322793&r=
  41. By: Mu, Yali; Dalheimer, Bernhard; Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan Von
    Keywords: Marketing, International Relations/Trade, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322355&r=
  42. By: Hu, Xinran; Zhang, Yumei; Chen, Kevin; Fan, Shenggen
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Marketing, Agribusiness
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322409&r=
  43. By: Mao, Hui; Quan, Yurong; Fu, Yong; Chen, Shaojian
    Keywords: Agribusiness, International Development, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322087&r=
  44. By: Palash, Prokash D.; Li, Wenying; Zhao, Shuoli
    Keywords: Marketing, Consumer/Household Economics, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322271&r=
  45. By: Win, Myat Thida; Maredia, Mywish K.; Boughton, Duncan H.
    Keywords: International Development, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322346&r=
  46. By: Maas, Alexander S.; McIntosh, Christopher S.; Fuller, Kate B.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Resource/Energy Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322072&r=
  47. By: Pathak, Santosh; Wang, Hua; Adusumilli, Naveen C.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Production Economics, Risk and Uncertainty
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322324&r=
  48. By: Kim, Yong J.; Jung, Jinho; Kim, Sanghyo
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Agricultural and Food Policy, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322525&r=
  49. By: Blemings, Benjamin T.; Bock, Margaret; Scarcioffolo, Alexandre
    Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban Development, Agricultural and Food Policy, Environmental Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322466&r=
  50. By: Kim, Youngho; Lichtenberg, Erik; Newburn, David
    Keywords: Resource/Energy Economics and Policy, Environmental Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322103&r=
  51. By: Zheng, Yanan; Goodhue, Rachael E.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Environmental Economics and Policy, Production Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322085&r=
  52. By: Manning, Dale; Rad, Mani Rouhi; Ogle, Stephen; Mansfield, David
    Keywords: Resource/Energy Economics and Policy, Environmental Economics and Policy, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322539&r=
  53. By: Schwab, Benjamin; Yu, Jisang
    Keywords: International Development, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322475&r=
  54. By: Toran, Katherine; Lanthier, Michael; Estrin, Andrew J.
    Keywords: Health Economics and Policy, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Agricultural and Food Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322310&r=
  55. By: Ceccarelli, Tomaso; Kannan, Samyuktha; Cecchi, Francesco; Janssen, Sander
    Abstract: Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are considered a possible game changer in boosting agricultural productivity, profitability, sustainability, and resilience worldwide. Yet, more evidence is needed to understand the impact of current and potential digitally enabled solutions. Using a food systems approach, this paper reviews existing evidence and discusses the conditions, rural population segments, and timelines needed to achieve desired outcomes. It finds that serving the whole farmer ecosystem is an emergent yet unexplored pathway. The paper concludes by providing recommendations on the role of public institutions and policymakers in shaping ICTs for inclusive and sustainable food systems transformation.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies
    Date: 2022–06–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:unadrs:322003&r=
  56. By: McLeod, Alexandria N.; Yang, Wei; Fang, Di; Nayga, Rodolfo M. Jr.
    Keywords: Marketing, Agribusiness, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322163&r=
  57. By: Wang, Xiaoxi; Cai, Hao; Xuan, Jiaqi
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Marketing, Environmental Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322403&r=
  58. By: Priestley, Samuel L.; Valizadeh, Pourya
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Marketing, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322514&r=
  59. By: Reardon, Thomas; Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda; Minten, Bart
    Abstract: Food systems are made up of a cluster of different value chains, including output, lateral, and research and development. This paper explores the rise of SMEs in transforming food systems—from traditional, to transitional, to modern. It discusses SMEs roles in the evolution, structure, and conduct of each segment of the midstream. It examines the impacts of the rise of midstream SMEs on employment, small farms, the environment and consumers.
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Community/Rural/Urban Development, Production Economics
    Date: 2022–05–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:unadrs:321998&r=
  60. By: Wang, Xingguo; Valizadeh, Pourya; Bryant, Henry L.
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agricultural and Food Policy, Consumer/Household Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322235&r=
  61. By: Wang, Hongsha; Chen, Qihui; Zhu, Chen
    Keywords: Institutional and Behavioral Economics, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322112&r=
  62. By: Erol, Erdal; Dillon, Carl R.; Burdine, Kenneth H.
    Keywords: Production Economics, Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Agricultural Finance
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322291&r=
  63. By: Steinhübel, Linda; Wegmann, Johannes; Jose, Monish
    Keywords: International Development, Community/Rural/Urban Development, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322143&r=
  64. By: Odening, Martin; Plogmann, Jana; Musshoff, Oliver; Ritter, Matthias
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Risk and Uncertainty, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322077&r=
  65. By: Kwon, Daye; Myers, Robert J.; Mason, Nicole M.
    Keywords: International Development, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Health Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322493&r=
  66. By: Abdullah Al-Amin, A.K.M; Lowenberg‑DeBoer, James; Franklin, K.; Behrendt, K.
    Abstract: Field size constrains spatial and temporal management of agriculture with implications for farm profitability, field biodiversity and environmental performance. Large, conventional equipment struggles to farm small, irregularly shaped fields efficiently. The study hypothesized that autonomous crop machines would make it possible to farm small non-rectangular fields profitably, thereby preserving field biodiversity and other environmental benefits. Using the experience of the Hands Free Hectare (HFH) demonstration project, this study developed algorithms to estimate field times (hr/ha) and field efficiency (%) subject to field size in grain-oil-seed farms of the United Kingdom using four different equipment sets. Results show that field size had a substantial impact on technical and economic performance of all equipment sets, but autonomous machines were able to farm small 1 ha non-rectangular (i.e., right-angled triangular) fields profitably. Small fields with equipment of all sizes and types required more time, but for HFH equipment sets (i.e., 28 kW conventional machine with human operator and 28 kW autonomous equipment set) field size had the least impact. HFH linear programming model solutions show that autonomous machines decreased wheat production cost by £21/ton to £40/ton for small non-rectangular fields, while 112 kW and 221 kW equipment sets with human operators were not profitable for small fields. Technical and economic feasibility in small fields imply that autonomous machines could facilitate biodiversity and improve environmental performance.
    Keywords: Crop Production/Industries, Land Economics/Use
    Date: 2022–07–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:haaepa:322755&r=
  67. By: Kashyap, Pratyoosh; Jablonski, Becca B.R.; Bauman, Allison
    Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban Development, Agricultural and Food Policy, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322167&r=
  68. By: Abdullah Al-Amin, A.K.M; Lowenberg‑DeBoer, James; Franklin, K.; Behrendt, K.
    Abstract: Field size constrains spatial and temporal management of agriculture with implications for farm profitability, field biodiversity and environmental performance. Large, conventional equipment struggles to farm small, irregularly shaped fields efficiently. The study hypothesized that autonomous crop machines would make it possible to farm small non-rectangular fields profitably, thereby preserving field biodiversity and other environmental benefits. Using the experience of the Hands Free Hectare (HFH) demonstration project, this study developed algorithms to estimate field times (hr/ha) and field efficiency (%) subject to field size in grain-oil-seed farms of the United Kingdom using four different equipment sets. Results show that field size had a substantial impact on technical and economic performance of all equipment sets, but autonomous machines were able to farm small 1 ha non-rectangular (i.e., right-angled triangular) fields profitably. Small fields with equipment of all sizes and types required more time, but for HFH equipment sets (i.e., 28 kW conventional machine with human operator and 28 kW autonomous equipment set) field size had the least impact. HFH linear programming model solutions show that autonomous machines decreased wheat production cost by £21/ton to £40/ton for small non-rectangular fields, while 112 kW and 221 kW equipment sets with human operators were not profitable for small fields. Technical and economic feasibility in small fields imply that autonomous machines could facilitate biodiversity and improve environmental performance.
    Keywords: Crop Production/Industries, Land Economics/Use
    Date: 2022–07–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:haaewp:322755&r=
  69. By: Akhundjanov, Sherzod B.; Pozo, Veronica F.; Thomas, Briana
    Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Teaching, Communication, and Extension
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322197&r=
  70. By: Simandjuntak, Daniel P.; Jaenicke, Edward C.; Wrenn, Douglas H.
    Keywords: Marketing, Consumer/Household Economics, Agribusiness
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322183&r=
  71. By: Goyal, Raghav; Adjemian, Michael K.; Secor, William
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy, Agribusiness, Risk and Uncertainty
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322340&r=
  72. By: Wang, Yutian; Chen, Xuan; Shi, Longzhong
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Marketing
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322250&r=
  73. By: Low, Guy; Dalhaus, Tobias; Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Marketing, Environmental Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322300&r=
  74. By: Engemann, Helena; Jafari, Yaghoob; Heckelei, Thomas
    Keywords: International Relations/Trade, International Development, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322413&r=
  75. By: Gao, Penghui; Secor, William; Escalante, Cesar L.
    Keywords: Agricultural Finance, Agribusiness, Productivity Analysis
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322329&r=
  76. By: Jens Abildtrup (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
    Date: 2021–12–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03721838&r=
  77. By: Mohammadi, Mati; Gray, Allan W.; Brewer, Brady E.
    Keywords: Marketing, Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Agribusiness
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322489&r=
  78. By: Silva, Nirodha De; Whittaker, Wesley; Chidmi, Benaissa
    Keywords: Agribusiness, Marketing, Research Methods/Statistical Methods
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322334&r=
  79. By: Bachev, Hrabrin
    Abstract: There have been continuous debates about the essence and levels of efficiency of farms and agrarian organizations, with an increasing focus on governance aspects in recent years. Nevertheless, most of the existing assessments are at a conceptual or qualitative level due to well-known “measurement” problems related to transacting costs. This article incorporates the New Institutional and Transaction Costs Economics framework and suggests a practical approach for assessing the level and factors of governance efficiency of Bulgarian farms as a whole and of different types and locations. The evaluation of governance efficiency of the country’s farms is made on the basis of original micro-data collected by the managers of typical farms. The "Nature of the problems in effective organization for major class farm transactions for securing needed factors of production and marketing of output" is used as an indicator for the comparative efficiency and adaptability (equal, lower, or greater to another farm/s or organisation/s depending on the extent of transacting difficulties) of individual farms. The study has found that the governance efficiency of farms is at a Good level but 60% of all farms in the county are with a Low efficiency and will likely cease to exist in near future. Major factors for inferior governance efficiency of Bulgarian farms are unsatisfactory efficiency in Supply of Necessary Labour, Innovations and Know-how, and Funding. There is a huge variation in the level and factors of governance efficiency of farms with different juridical types, sizes, product specializations, and geographical and ecological locations as well as in the share of farms with different levels of efficiency in each group. Furthermore, a strong correlation has been found between the level of governance efficiency and adaptability of farms, and diverse critical internal and external market, technological, institutional, personal, etc. factors that could feasibly increase the competitiveness of holdings. The study has proved that there is a big discrepancy between the new assessments of Governance efficiency with dominating traditional approaches for farm efficiency assessments based on factors' productivity. The study has also found that there was an improvement in the overall governance efficiency of Bulgarian farms compared to 2016. Nevertheless, the share of (good and high) efficient farms significantly declined during the same period. The suggested approach has to be further improved, and widely and periodically applied in economic analysis at various levels which require the systemic collection of a novel type of micro-data on farms governance and transaction costs.
    Keywords: governance, efficiency, farm, transaction costs, Bulgaria
    JEL: D2 L2 Q1 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q18
    Date: 2022–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:113696&r=
  80. By: Zheng, Qiujie; Nayga, Rodolfo M. Jr.; Yang, Wei; Tokunaga, Kanae
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Marketing, Environmental Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322154&r=
  81. By: Federico Carril-Caccia (University of Granada); Jordi Paniagua (University of Valencia and Kellogg Iinstitute, University of Notre Dame); Marta Suarez-Varela (Bank of Spain)
    Abstract: Food insecurity is a pressing global concern and little is known of its economic outreach. This paper quantifies the effects of food crises on international forced migration (FIMs) flows using a structural gravity model. We construct a novel dataset that measures to the severity, intensity, and causes of the food crises. Results suggest that even mild food crises tend to increase international forced migration. Severe food crises skew FIM toward less developed countries. Our results are consistent with the fact that food crises tighten liquidity constraints on migration, worsening as food crises intensify.
    Keywords: Forced migration; Food crises; Gravity equation
    JEL: A1
    Date: 2022
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:inf:wpaper:2022.06&r=
  82. By: Lim, Kar Ho; Ojha, Renu; Nayga, Rodolfo M. Jr.; Sullivan, Pauline
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Marketing, Institutional and Behavioral Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322114&r=
  83. By: Merfeld, Joshua D.
    Keywords: Consumer/Household Economics, Labor and Human Capital
    Date: 2022–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aesc22:321214&r=
  84. By: Silva, Andres Montes; Astorga, Andres; Fau´ndez, Rodrigo; Santos, Karla
    Keywords: Food Safety, Nutrition, and Policy, Health Economics, Household and Labor Economics
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322093&r=
  85. By: Feng, Wenhui; Page, Elina T.; Sun, Bangyao; Cash, Sean B.
    Keywords: Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety, Marketing, Health Economics and Policy
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aaea22:322313&r=
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.
This page is being maintained by Thomas Krichel. It was last updated on 2024‒05‒02 at 13:06.