nep-sbm New Economics Papers
on Small Business Management
Issue of 2013‒11‒02
five papers chosen by
Joao Carlos Correia Leitao
Universidade da Beira Interior and Universidade de Lisboa

  1. Succeeding in Innovation: Key Insights on the Role of R&D and Technological Acquisition Drawn from Company Data By Conte, Andrea; Vivarelli, Marco
  2. “Mobility, networks and innovation: The role of regions’ absorptive capacity” By Ernest Miguélez; Rosina Moreno
  3. Firms’ financing constraints: Do perceptions match the actual situation? By A. FERRANDO; K. MULIER
  4. Explaining Japan's Unproductive Two Decades By FUKAO Kyoji
  5. Processes of firm growth and diversification: theory and evidence By Alex Coad; Christina Guenther

  1. By: Conte, Andrea (European Commission); Vivarelli, Marco (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore)
    Abstract: This paper discusses the relationship between a company's investment in innovation and its success in introducing new product and/or process innovations. In doing so, this analysis departs from the standard approach which puts forward a homogenous R&D-based knowledge production function by introducing different types of innovation investments (R&D and technology acquisition) for different sets of companies. Using the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) dataset comprising more than 3000 Italian manufacturing companies, the econometric analysis adopts a set of techniques which allows to control for the sample selection, endogeneity and simultaneity problems which arise when dealing with CIS data. The main findings are summarised as follows: (1) beyond the acknowledged effect of R&D in increasing the probability of success of product innovation, a larger-than-expected role is played by technology acquisition in the innovation process; (2) the relative importance of R&D and technology acquisition varies significantly across different types of companies where crucial dimensions of analysis are company size and the technological domain of a sector.
    Keywords: R&D, product innovation, process innovation, embodied technical change, sample selection, SUR, community innovation survey
    JEL: O31
    Date: 2013–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7671&r=sbm
  2. By: Ernest Miguélez (Economics and Statistics Division, World Intellectual Property Organization & AQR-IREA & CReAM); Rosina Moreno (Faculty of Economics, University of Barcelona)
    Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to assess the extent to which regions’ absorptive capacity determines knowledge flows’ impact on regional innovation intensity. In particular, it looks at the role of the cross-regional co-patenting and mobility of inventors in fostering innovation, and how regions with large absorptive capacity make the most of these two phenomena. The paper uses a panel of 274 regions over 8 years to estimate a regional knowledge production function with fixed-effects. Network and mobility variables, and interactions with regions’ absorptive capacity, are included among the r.h.s. variables to test the hypotheses. We find evidence of the role of both mobility and networks. However, inflows of inventors are critical for wealthier regions, while have more nuanced effects for less developed areas. It also shows that regions’ absorptive capacity critically adds an innovation premium to the benefits to tap into external knowledge pools. Indeed, the present study corroborates earlier work on the role of mobility and networks for spatial knowledge diffusion and subsequent innovation. However, it clearly illustrates that a certain level of technological development is critical to take advantage of these phenomena, and therefore “one-size-fits-all” innovation policies need to be reconsidered.
    Keywords: absorptive capacity, inventor mobility, spatial networks, patents, regional innovation. JEL classification:
    Date: 2013–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ira:wpaper:201316&r=sbm
  3. By: A. FERRANDO; K. MULIER
    Abstract: This paper uses a non parametric matching procedure to match survey replies to balance sheet information. It draws on the SAFE survey on access to finance for a sample of 11886 firms in the euro area which are matched with their nearest neighbour in an extended dataset with balance sheet information on 2.3 million firms. We investigate the role of firm characteristics with respect to the experience of facing financing obstacles in the period 2009-2011. We distinguish between firms' perceived financing constraints and actual financing constraints. We find that more profitable firms are less likely to face actual financing constraints. Also firms with more working capital and lower leverage ratios are less likely to be actually financially constrained, however profitability measures seem to be more robust. Firms are more likely to perceive access to finance problematic when they have more debt with short term maturity. Finally, firm age, but not size, is important in explaining both the perceived and the actual financial constraints.
    Keywords: SMEs, financial constraints, survey data, statistical matching of data
    JEL: E22 G30 G10 O16 K40
    Date: 2013–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rug:rugwps:13/844&r=sbm
  4. By: FUKAO Kyoji
    Abstract: Using industry- and micro-level data, this paper examines why Japan's productivity growth has been slow for such a long time and how it can be accelerated in the future. Japan's capital-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio continued to increase after 1991, which must have contributed to the decline in the rate of return on capital in Japan by decreasing the marginal productivity of capital. On the other hand, accumulation of information and communications technology (ICT) capital and intangible investment in Japan was very slow. Compared with large firms, which enjoyed an acceleration in total factor productivity (TFP) growth in recent years, Japanese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) were left behind in ICT capital and intangible investment, and their productivity growth has been very low. Furthermore, as large firms expanded their supply chains globally and relocated their factories abroad, research and development (R&D) spillovers from large firms to SMEs seem to have declined.
    Date: 2013–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:eti:polidp:13021&r=sbm
  5. By: Alex Coad (SPRU, University of Sussex, UK); Christina Guenther (WHU - Otto Beisheim school of Management, Germany)
    Keywords: Diversification, firm growth, Penrose, Machine tools, Growth process
    JEL: L6 L11 L20 L25
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sru:ssewps:2013-11&r=sbm

This nep-sbm issue is ©2013 by Joao Carlos Correia Leitao. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.