nep-ipr New Economics Papers
on Intellectual Property Rights
Issue of 2020‒11‒16
four papers chosen by
Giovanni Ramello
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”

  1. Revisiting the optimal patent policy tradeoff for environmental technologies Revisiting the optimal patent policy tradeoff for environmental technologies By Clement Bonnet
  2. The Use of Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms by Publicly Supported Firms By Link, Albert; van Hasselt, Martijn
  3. Per Unit and Ad Valorem Royalties in a Patent Licensing Game By Montinaro, Marta; Pal, Rupayan; Scrimitore, Marcella
  4. Measuring Knowledge with Patent Data: an Application to Low Carbon Energy Technologies By Clement Bonnet

  1. By: Clement Bonnet (EconomiX - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CEC - Chaire Economie du Climat - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres)
    Abstract: The invention and the diffusion of environmental process of production and consumption goods are impeded by two market failures: the first on environment and the second on knowledge. The question arises whether the instruments aiming at correcting these market failures should be jointly designed or not. We investigate this question for a major instrument of support to innovation: the patent system. We demonstrate that a patent system and a discriminating environmental taxation that are jointly defined provide for a greater efficiency. We conclude that the two externalities interact with each other through the patent system.
    Keywords: environmental innovation,double externality,patent policy
    Date: 2020–10–19
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02971676&r=all
  2. By: Link, Albert (University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics); van Hasselt, Martijn (University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics)
    Abstract: Technology-based firms use intellectual property protection mechanisms (IPPMs) to appropriate the returns to their research investments. The empirical literature has generally focused on the use of IPPMs by private sector firms to appropriate the returns to their privately financed R&D-based technologies. To date, studies have not considered the use of IPPMs by private sector firms whose research is publicly financed. We identify empirically a number of significant covariates with the use of a portfolio of formal IPPMs consisting of patents, copyrights, and trademarks. However, our multivariate empirical analyses show that caution is needed in generalizing about such covariates when discussing any one particular formal IPPM.
    Keywords: Patents; Copyrights; Trademarks; Intellectual property; SBIR program; Program evaluation; Technology;
    JEL: O34 O38
    Date: 2020–10–30
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ris:uncgec:2020_009&r=all
  3. By: Montinaro, Marta; Pal, Rupayan; Scrimitore, Marcella
    Abstract: In a context of product innovation, we study two-part tariff licensing between a patentee and a potential rival which compete in a differentiated product market characterized by network externalities. The latter are shown to crucially affect the relative profitability of Cournot vs. Bertrand when a per unit royalty is applied. By contrast, we find that Cournot yields higher profits than Bertrand under ad valorem royalties, regardless of the strength of network effects.
    Keywords: Production Economics
    Date: 2020–11–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:feemff:307305&r=all
  4. By: Clement Bonnet (EconomiX - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Chaire économie du climat - Chaire économie du climat)
    Date: 2020–10–19
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02971680&r=all

This nep-ipr issue is ©2020 by Giovanni Ramello. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.