nep-ipr New Economics Papers
on Intellectual Property Rights
Issue of 2019‒10‒21
six papers chosen by
Giovanni Ramello
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”

  1. Foreign Competition and Domestic Innovation: Evidence from U.S. Patents By Autor, David; Dorn, David; Hanson, Gordon H.; Pisano, Gary; Shu, Pian
  2. The Unexpected Consequences of Generic Entry By Micael Castanheira; Carmine Ornaghi; Georges Siotis
  3. When authors become inventors: an empirical analysis on patent-paper pairs in medical research By Arianna Martinelli; Elena Romito
  4. Bargaining Failure and Freedom to Operate: Re-evaluating the Effect of Patents on Cumulative Innovation By Gaessler, Fabian; Harhoff, Dietmar; Sorg, Stefan
  5. Patterns of innovation during the industrial revolution: a reappraisal using a composite indicator of patent quality By Nuvolari, Alessandro; Tartari, Valentina; Tranchero, Matteo
  6. A geography of corporate knowledge flows across world regions: evidence from patent citations of top R&D-investing firms By Mafini Dosso; Didier Lebert

  1. By: Autor, David (MIT); Dorn, David (University of Zurich); Hanson, Gordon H. (University of California, San Diego); Pisano, Gary (Harvard University); Shu, Pian (Georgia Institute of Technology)
    Abstract: Manufacturing accounts for more than three-quarters of U.S. corporate patents. The competitive shock to this sector emanating from China's economic ascent could in theory either augment or stifle U.S. innovation. Using three decades of U.S. patents matched to corporate owners, we quantify how foreign competition affects domestic innovation. Rising import exposure intensifies competitive pressure, reducing sales, profitability, and R&D expenditure at U.S. firms. Accounting for confounding sectoral patenting trends, we find that U.S. patent production declines in sectors facing greater import competition. This adverse effect is larger among initially less profitable and less capital-intensive firms.
    Keywords: innovation, patents, trade
    JEL: F14 O30
    Date: 2019–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12638&r=all
  2. By: Micael Castanheira; Carmine Ornaghi; Georges Siotis
    Abstract: Generic drugs are sold at a fraction of the original brand price. Yet, generic entry typically produces a drop in the quantity market share of the molecule losing exclusivity. This effect is economically and statistically significant for a large dataset covering hundreds of prescription drugs sold in the US during the period 1994Q1-2003Q4. This paper proposes the first systematic analysis of what appears to be a market anomaly.We propose a model to characterize the market equilibrium before and after generic entry. We identify precise conditions under which entry reduces the quantity market share of the molecule. Intriguingly, this is more likely to occur when the remaining patent-protected molecules feature low horizontal differentiation. We test this and other theoretical predictions of the model and find they are validated empirically.
    Keywords: Non-Price competition, Pharmaceutical industry, Generic entry, Consumer choice
    Date: 2019–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/293928&r=all
  3. By: Arianna Martinelli; Elena Romito
    Abstract: This paper investigates the effect of patenting on follow-on knowledge in cancer research. Using a difference-in-difference approach on an original dataset of patent-paper-pairs we are able to estimate the causal effect of the granting of a patent on scientic development in the same domain. Furthermore, we disentangle between private companies and universities in order to assess whether patenting impacts differently on the two groups. In addition, we study to which extend the degree of applicability of an innovation is further affects the relation. To address these issues we build a novel dataset matching patent data (retrieved from USPTO) and publication data (retrieved from Thompson-Web of Science). Results show that patenting reduces the rate of citations of the paired publication indicating a decrease of related scientic activity only in case the citing agent belongs to a public institution. In addition, the the more invention is applied, the weaker is the negative effect. This paper makes a contribution to the debate on IPR and economics of science.
    Keywords: IPRs; Patent; Scientific publications; Applicability.
    Date: 2019–10–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ssa:lemwps:2019/32&r=all
  4. By: Gaessler, Fabian; Harhoff, Dietmar; Sorg, Stefan
    Abstract: We investigate the causal effect of patent rights on cumulative innovation, using large-scale data that approximate the patent universe in its technological and economic variety. We introduce a novel instrumental variable for patent invalidation that exploits personnel scarcity in post-grant opposition at the European Patent Ofï¬ ce. We ï¬ nd that patent invalidation leads to a highly signiï¬ cant and sizeable increase of follow-on inventions. The effect is driven by cases where the removal of the individual exclusion right creates substantial freedom to operate for third parties. Importantly, our results suggest that bargaining failure between original and follow-on innovators is not limited to environments commonly associated with high transaction costs.
    Keywords: bargaining failure; Cumulative innovation; freedom to operate; opposition; patents
    JEL: K41 L24 O31 O32 O33 O34
    Date: 2019–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13969&r=all
  5. By: Nuvolari, Alessandro; Tartari, Valentina; Tranchero, Matteo
    Abstract: We introduce a new bibliographic quality indicator for English patents granted in the period 1700-1850. The indicator is based on the visibility of each patent both in the contemporary legal and engineering literature and in modern authoritative works on the history of science and technology. The indicator permits to operationalize empirically the distinction between micro and macroinventions. Our fi ndings indicate that macroinventions did not exhibit any speci c time clustering, while at the same time they were characterized by a labor-saving bias. These results suggest that Mokyr's and Allen's views of macroinventions, rather than conflicting, should be regarded as complementary.
    Keywords: industrial revolution; macroinventions; microinventions; patents
    JEL: N74 O31
    Date: 2019–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:13958&r=all
  6. By: Mafini Dosso (European Commission - JRC); Didier Lebert (ENSTA ParisTech, UniversiteÌ Paris-Saclay (France))
    Abstract: This exploratory study looks at the structural and geographical patterns of corporate knowledge flows from a regional perspective. The methodological approach combines the centrality indicators developed in the social network analysis (SNA) and complementary tools from the graphs theory to assess the betweenness centrality of regions (or poles)- their ability to control knowledge flows within a network or to impact its cohesiveness - and the relative contribution of individual firms (or layers) to the centrality of regions. The combination of the two approaches brings relevant insights on the way large R&D-driven firms organise their knowledge sourcing and generation across world regions
    Keywords: patent citations; knowledge flows; graphs theory; regions; top corporate R&D investors.
    JEL: L14 O33 R58
    Date: 2019–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ipt:wpaper:201903&r=all

This nep-ipr issue is ©2019 by Giovanni Ramello. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.