nep-env New Economics Papers
on Environmental Economics
Issue of 2007‒09‒02
twenty-six papers chosen by
Francisco S.Ramos
Federal University of Pernambuco

  1. Domestic effects of environmental policies with transboundary pollution By CAVAGNAC Michel; PECHOUX Isabelle;
  2. Energy Substitutions, Climate change and Carbon sinks By LAFFORGUE Gilles; MAGNE Bertrand; MOREAUX Michel
  3. Fiddling while carbon burns: why climate policy needs pervasive emission pricing as well as technology promotion By Jack Pezzey; Frank Jotzo; John Quiggin
  4. Optimal Soil Management and Environmental Policy By LAFFORGUE Gilles; OUESLATI Walid;
  5. Does Formal or Informal Environmental Regulation have an Impact on Costs? An Empirical Analysis of the Brazilian By FERES José; REYNAUD Arnaud;
  6. On the North-South Effects of Environmental Policy: Rent Transfers, Relocation and Growth By DAUBANES Julien; GRIMAUD André;
  7. Innovation markets in the policy appraisal of climate change mitigation By GRIMAUD André; LAFFORGUE Gilles; MAGNE Bertrand
  8. The Regulator and the Judge: The Optimal Mix in The Control of Environmental Risk By HIRIART Yolande; MARTIMORT David; POUYET Jerome
  9. Economic growth and Climate change in a decentralized Economy: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach By GRIMAUD André; LAFFORGUE Gilles; MAGNE Bertrand
  10. Optimal Dynamic Management of a Renewable Energy Source under Uncertainty By BOBTCHEFF Catherine; ;
  11. Ordering the Extraction of Polluting Nonrenewable Resources By CHAKRAVORTY Ujjayant; MOREAUX Michel; TIDBALL Mabel
  12. On the Effects of Stochastic Technical Change on Optimal Sustainable Growth Paths with Exhaustible Resource By LAFFORGUE Gilles; ;
  13. On the Optimal Taxation of an Exhaustible Resource under Monopolistic Extraction By DAUBANES Julien; ;
  14. Ethanolomics: The Think-About's of the Mexican Ethanol Project By Ricardo Cantú
  15. Agriculture and Resource Exploitation: A Dynamic Bioeconomic Model of Agricultural Effort and Land Use Determination By FOUDI Sebastien; ;
  16. A dynamic model of food and clean energy By CHAKRAVORTY Ujjayant; MAGNE Bertrand; MOREAUX Michel
  17. Multi-stand Forest Management Under a Climatic Risk: Do time and Risk Preferences Matter? By COUTURE Stephane; REYNAUD Arnaud;
  18. Using Ex Post Data to Estimate the Hurdle Rate of Abatement Investments - An application to the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry and Energy Sector By LOFGREN Asa; MILLOCK Katrin; NAUGES Céline
  19. The Alberta dilemma: Optimal sharing of a water resource by an agricultural and an oil sector By GAUDET Gérard; MOREAUX Michel; WITHAGEN Cees
  20. On the Optimal Taxation of an Exhaustible Resource Under Monopolistic Extraction By Daubanes, J.
  21. Overcoming the Natural Resource Constraint Through Dedicated R&D Effort with Heterogenous Labor Supply By AMIGUES Jean-Pierre; MOREAUX Michel; RICCI Francesco
  22. Evaluating the impact of CAP reforms on land use and the environment: a two-step estimation with multiple selection rules and panel data By BEL François; LACROIX Anne; SALANIE François; THOMAS Alban
  23. Substitutions entre Energies, Effet de Serre et Puits de Carbonne By LAFFORGUE Gilles; MAGNE Bertrand; MOREAUX Michel
  24. Bubbles in Prices of Exhaustible Resources By Boyan Jovanovic
  25. Carafe ou bouteille ? Le rôle de la qualité de l'environnement dans la décision du consommateur By BONTEMPS Christophe; NAUGES Céline;
  26. Lemons are Green: The Informative Role of a Pigovian Tax By MAHENC Philippe; ;

  1. By: CAVAGNAC Michel (LERNA, TSE); PECHOUX Isabelle;
    Date: 2007–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:07.07.228&r=env
  2. By: LAFFORGUE Gilles (LERNA, TSE); MAGNE Bertrand; MOREAUX Michel (LERNA, TSE)
    Date: 2007–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:07.01.222&r=env
  3. By: Jack Pezzey (Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University,); Frank Jotzo (Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University); John Quiggin (Risk & Sustainable Management Group, School of Economics, University of Queensland)
    Abstract: Effective climate policy requires global emissions of greenhouse gases to be cut drastically, which in energy sectors can be achieved by lower emissions supply technologies, greater energy use efficiency, and substitution in demand. For policy to be efficient requires fairly uniform, pervasive emission pricing from taxes, permit trading, or hybrid combinations of the two, as well as significant government support for low-emission technologies. We compare the kind of technology-focused climate policies currently adopted by Australia and the USA, the ÔAsia- Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and ClimateÕ (AP6), against this ideal policy yardstick. We find that they omit the need for emission pricing to achieve abatement effectively and efficiently; that they over-prescribe which abatement actions should be used most; that they make unrealistic assumptions about how much progress can be achieved by voluntarism and cooperation, in the absence of either adequate funding or mandatory policies; and that they unjustifiably contrast technology-focused policy and the Kyoto Protocol approach as the only two policies worth considering, and thus ignore other important options.
    Keywords: greenhouse gas emissions, abatement, emission taxes, emissions trading, technology policy, innovation, Asia-Pacific Partnership, AP6
    JEL: Q42 Q54
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rsm:murray:m06_9&r=env
  4. By: LAFFORGUE Gilles (LERNA, University of Toulouse); OUESLATI Walid;
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.15.208&r=env
  5. By: FERES José; REYNAUD Arnaud (LERNA, University of Toulouse);
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.16.209&r=env
  6. By: DAUBANES Julien (LERNA, University of Toulouse); GRIMAUD André (LERNA, University of Toulouse);
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.26.219&r=env
  7. By: GRIMAUD André (LERNA, TSE); LAFFORGUE Gilles (LERNA, TSE); MAGNE Bertrand
    Date: 2007–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:07.12.233&r=env
  8. By: HIRIART Yolande (LERNA, University of Toulouse); MARTIMORT David; POUYET Jerome
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.27.220&r=env
  9. By: GRIMAUD André (LERNA, TSE); LAFFORGUE Gilles (LERNA, TSE); MAGNE Bertrand
    Date: 2007–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:07.04.225&r=env
  10. By: BOBTCHEFF Catherine (LERNA, University of Toulouse); ;
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.21.214&r=env
  11. By: CHAKRAVORTY Ujjayant; MOREAUX Michel (LERNA, University of Toulouse); TIDBALL Mabel
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.19.212&r=env
  12. By: LAFFORGUE Gilles (LERNA, University of Toulouse); ;
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.02.195&r=env
  13. By: DAUBANES Julien (LERNA, TSE); ;
    Date: 2007–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:07.09.230&r=env
  14. By: Ricardo Cantú
    Abstract: The Mexican Ethanol Project has the potential of power up rural economy, improve the environment quality, and substitute the non-renewable fossil energy resources. But the risk of not achieving these is latent: the market distorts that it could unleash can change the expected outcomes. Public policies, such as No Deforestation, Investments in Agricultural Productivity, and Ethanol Manufacture in situ, could help orientate the private incentives to increase social welfare. In a big proportion, PEMEX and the Mexican Federal Government would be directly, or indirectly, affected by the domestic ethanol production, opening a door for them to participate in it and avoid damage on their interests. But there's still a question to answer: how long it would take before these benefits could be felt?
    Keywords: ethanol, rural development, Mexico, public policies, oil crisis
    JEL: H30 L32 L33 Q20 Q23 Q27 Q29 Q12 Q13 Q18 R38 R11 R13
    Date: 2007–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:egb:wpaper:20073&r=env
  15. By: FOUDI Sebastien (LERNA, University of Toulouse); ;
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.25.218&r=env
  16. By: CHAKRAVORTY Ujjayant; MAGNE Bertrand; MOREAUX Michel (LERNA, University of Toulouse)
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.10.203&r=env
  17. By: COUTURE Stephane; REYNAUD Arnaud (LERNA, University of Toulouse);
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.17.210&r=env
  18. By: LOFGREN Asa; MILLOCK Katrin; NAUGES Céline (LERNA, TSE)
    Date: 2007–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:07.06.227&r=env
  19. By: GAUDET Gérard; MOREAUX Michel (LERNA, University of Toulouse); WITHAGEN Cees
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.06.199&r=env
  20. By: Daubanes, J. (Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research)
    Abstract: In a simple model of resource depletion (isoelastic demand and constant unit extraction cost), we fully characterize the set of linear effiency-inducing tax/subsidy schemes. We show that this set is infinite and all the larger as the cost of extraction is low. Depending on the magnitude of the latter, we show that there may exist optimal linear strict taxes, thus allowing the regulator to induce efficiency without subsidizing the mine industry at any date. We illustrate and argue that the exhaustibility constraint the monopolist extractor faces can be exploited by the regulator to relax the standard trade-off between inducing efficiency and raising revenues from the monopoly.
    Keywords: Exhaustible resources; Imperfect competition; Optimal taxation
    JEL: Q30 L12 H21
    Date: 2007
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:kubcen:200734&r=env
  21. By: AMIGUES Jean-Pierre (LERNA, University of Toulouse); MOREAUX Michel (LERNA, University of Toulouse); RICCI Francesco (LERNA, University of Toulouse)
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.22.215&r=env
  22. By: BEL François; LACROIX Anne; SALANIE François (LERNA, University of Toulouse); THOMAS Alban (LERNA, University of Toulouse)
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.13.206&r=env
  23. By: LAFFORGUE Gilles (LERNA, University of Toulouse); MAGNE Bertrand; MOREAUX Michel (LERNA, University of Toulouse)
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.03.196&r=env
  24. By: Boyan Jovanovic
    Date: 2007–08–24
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cla:levarc:122247000000001414&r=env
  25. By: BONTEMPS Christophe; NAUGES Céline (LERNA, University of Toulouse);
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.07.200&r=env
  26. By: MAHENC Philippe (LERNA, University of Toulouse); ;
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ler:wpaper:06.05.198&r=env

This nep-env issue is ©2007 by Francisco S.Ramos. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.