nep-afr New Economics Papers
on Africa
Issue of 2005‒01‒02
twenty-six papers chosen by
Suzanne McCoskey
US Naval Academy

  1. How good is growth for the poor? : the role of the initial income distribution in regional diversity in poverty trends By Kalwij,A.S.; Verschoor,A.
  2. A Comparative Analysis of the EU-Morocco FTA vs. Multilateral Liberalization By Elbehri, Aziz; Hertel, Thomas
  3. The interaction between growth, openness and inequality: Intertemporal Ramsey growth model analysis of South Africa*) By Hildegunn Ekroll Stokke; Jørn Rattsø
  4. The Returns to Participation in the Nonfarm Sector in Rural Rwanda By Andrew Dabalen; Stefano Paternostro; Gaelle Pierre
  5. Spatial Disparities in Developing Countries: Cities, Regions and International Trade By Anthony J. Venables
  6. Design the Financial Tool to Promote Universal Free Access to AIDS Care By Patrick Leoni; Stéphane Luchini
  7. Poverty Trap in a Tributary Mode of Production: The Peasant Economy of Ethiopia By Berhanu Abegaz
  8. The Effects of Market Reform on Maize Marketing Margins in South Africa By Lulama Ndibongo Traub; Thomas S. Jayne
  9. A Cross-Country Analysis of Household Responses to Adult Mortality in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for HIV/AIDS Mitigation and Rural Development Policies By David Mather; Cynthia Donovan; T. S. Jayne; Michael Weber; Edward Mazhangara; Linda Bailey; Kyeongwon Yoo; Takashi Yamano; Elliot Mghenyi
  10. USAID Contributes to Building National Capacity to Strengthen Food Security: an Example From Mali. By Duncan Boughton; John M. Staatz; Michael T. Weber
  11. Zimbabwe Food Security Success Story: Maize Market Reforms Improve Access to Food Even While Government Eliminates Food Subsidies. By T.S. Jayne; Lawrence Rubey; Munhamo Chisvo; Michael T. Weber
  12. Mozambique Food Security Success Story. By David L. Tschirley; Michael T. Weber
  13. Trends in Real Food Prices in Six Sub-Saharan African Countries By T.S. Jayne; Mulinge Mukumbu; John Duncan; John Staatz; Julie Howard; Mattias Lundberg; Kim Aldridge; Bethel Nakaponda; Jake Ferris; Francis Keita; Abdel Kader Sanankoua
  14. Payoffs to Investments in Agricultural Technology in Sub-Saharan Africa. By James F. Oehmke; Eric W. Crawford
  15. Relief Through Development: Maize Market Liberalization in Urban Kenya. By Gem Argwings-Kodhek; T.S. Jayne
  16. Determinants of Farm Productivity in Africa: A Synthesis of Four Case Studies. By Thomas Reardon; Valerie Kelly; Eric Crawford; Thomas Jayne; Kimseyinga Savadogo; Daniel Clay
  17. The Impact of Millet, Sorghum, and Cowpea Research and Technology Transfer in Niger. By Valentina Mazzucato; Samba Ly
  18. How Non-research Investments Affect Research Impact: The Case of Maize Technology Adoption in southern Mali. By Duncan Boughton; Bruno Henry de Frahan
  19. Zambia's Stop-and-Go Revolution: The Impact of Policies and Organizations on the Development and Spread of Hybrid Maize. By Julie A. Howard; Catherine Mungoma
  20. Returns to Oilseed and Maize Research in Uganda. By Rita Laker-Ojok
  21. Promoting Farm Investment for Sustainable Intensification of African Agriculture By Thomas Reardon; Eric Crawford; Valerie Kelly; Bocar Diagana
  22. Improving the Measurement and Analysis of African Aricultural Productivity: Promoting Complementarities Between Micro and Macro Data. By Valerie Kelly; Jane Hopkins; Thomas Reardon; Eric Crawford
  23. Effects of Market Reform on Access to Food by Low-Income Households: Evidence from Four Countries in Eastern and Southern Africa. By T.S. Jayne; Lawrence Rubey; David Tschirley; Mulinge Mukumbu; Munhamo Chisvo; Ana Paula Santos; Michael T. Weber; Patrick Diskin
  24. A Strategic Approach to Agricultural Research Program Planning in Sub-Saharan Africa. By Duncan Boughton; Eric Crawford; Julie Howard; James Oehmke; James Shaffer; John Staatz
  25. Will the CFA Franc Devaluation Enhance Sustainable Agricultural Intensification in the Senegalese Peanut Basin? By Bocar Diagana; Valerie Kelly
  26. Size Does Matter: International Trade and Population Size By Yochanan Shachmurove; Uriel Spiegel

  1. By: Kalwij,A.S.; Verschoor,A. (Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research)
    Abstract: Using panel data of 58 developing countries for the period 1980-1998, this study shows that the responsiveness of the $2 a day poverty headcount measure to changes in mean income and inequality significantly decreases with initial inequality and the ratio poverty line over mean income - taken as proxies for the initial density of income near the poverty line. Variations in these proxies account for the large crossregional differences in the income elasticity of poverty during the 1980s and 1990s. We find that the income elasticity of poverty in the mid 1990s equals -1.31 on average and ranges from -0.71 for Sub-Saharan Africa to -2.27 for the Middle East and North Africa, and that the Gini elasticity of poverty equals 0.80 on average and ranges from 0.01 in South Asia to 1.73 in Latin America. While variation in income growth accounts for most of the variation in poverty reduction across regions, the impact of variations in inequality and in elasticities of poverty is almost always too large to be ignored, and in particular in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
    JEL: C23 I32 O15
    Date: 2004
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:kubcen:2004115&r=afr
  2. By: Elbehri, Aziz; Hertel, Thomas
    Abstract: An applied general equilibrium model with oligopoly and scale economies, based on detailed plant-level data, is used to contrast the impacts of the Morocco-EU free trade area (FTA) to multilateral trade liberalization on Morocco’s economy. Simulation results show that the FTA agreement is likely to have adverse effects on Morocco due to: (a) deteriorating terms of trade, (b) reductions in output per firm in industries dominated by scale economies, (c) diversion of imports away from non-EU suppliers, and (d) potentially adverse effects on the aggregate demand for labor. We contrast this FTA with a multilateral liberalization scenario along the lines of those proposed under the Doha Development Round and find this more beneficial to Morocco, with overall welfare gains due to: (a) lesser terms of trade losses, (b) positive scale effects, (c) non-preferential liberalization of imports into Morocco, and (d) a positive impact on aggregate labor demand. We conclude that Morocco would be better off pursuing trade liberalization in the multilateral arena.
    Date: 2004
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gta:workpp:1643&r=afr
  3. By: Hildegunn Ekroll Stokke (Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology); Jørn Rattsø (Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
    Abstract: South Africa offers an interesting case study of the effects of openness because of the experiences with international sanctions and active trade policy. Shifts in productivity growth and income distribution before, under and after sanctions indicate the importance of foreign trade. The economic adjustment mechanisms involved are investigated in an intertemporal Ramsey growth model with endogenous skill-bias in technology and separating between labor and household types. Openness in particular affects the balance between innovation and adoption in the productivity growth. Economic growth under sanctions has been slow, but with an increase in the relative wage of unskilled labor. The model allows for counterfactual analysis of no-sanctions and offers a calibrated tariff-equivalence measure of the sanction effect. Openness is shown to imply technology adoption with skill bias that improves growth, but worsen income distribution. Demand-side responses, shifts in the consumption pattern, strengthen the distributive effects. The tradeoff between foreign spillover driven productivity growth and income distribution obviously is a challenge for growth policy.
    Date: 2004–12–14
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nst:samfok:4604&r=afr
  4. By: Andrew Dabalen; Stefano Paternostro; Gaelle Pierre
    Abstract: Dabalen, Paternostro, and Pierre investigate the differences in outcomes (earnings and consumption) between individuals (households) who participate in the nonfarm sector and those who do not. They use propensity score matching methods where they create appropriate comparison groups of individuals and households. First the authors find that nonfarm self-employed individuals in rural Rwanda have significantly higher earnings than farm workers and nonfarm formal employees. Second, they show that the benefits to nonfarm self-employment are much higher among the nonpoor than among the poor. Third, the authors show that diversified households—those with a farm and a nonfarm enterprise—are less likely to be poor. Finally, farm households who do not participate in the market have significantly lower consumption levels than households that do. However, the benefits to market participation appear to matter less for the poor than for the nonpoor. The authors find little difference in expenditures between market participants and nonmarket participants for comparable households in the bottom 40 percent of the expenditure distribution. This paper—a product of the Poverty Reduction Group, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network—is part of a larger effort in the network to understand rural nonfarm employment determinants.
    Keywords: Labor & Employment; Poverty; Rural Development
    Date: 2004–12–30
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3462&r=afr
  5. By: Anthony J. Venables
    Abstract: Spatial inequality in developing countries is due to the natural advantages of some regionsrelative to others and to the presence of agglomeration forces, leading to clustering ofactivity. This paper reviews and develops some simple models that capture these first andsecond nature economic geographies. The presence of increasing returns to scale in citiesleads to urban structures that are not optimally sized. This depresses the return to jobcreation, possibly retarding development. Looking at the wider regional structure,development can be associated with large shifts in the location of activity as industry goesfrom being inward looking to being export oriented.
    Keywords: cities, spatial disparities, urbanisation, developing countries
    JEL: R1 R12 O18
    Date: 2003–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp0593&r=afr
  6. By: Patrick Leoni; Stéphane Luchini
    Abstract: Typical of the AIDS epidemics is that governments in developing countries under-invest in drugs production because of the possible appearance of a curative vaccine. We design a financial tool allowing to hedge against this event. We show that the introduction of this asset increases social welfare, as well as the number of patients treated and the provision of public good.
    Keywords: option design, AIDS, social choices
    JEL: G13 I12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zur:iewwpx:214&r=afr
  7. By: Berhanu Abegaz (Department of Economics, College of William and Mary)
    Abstract: The paradox of EthiopiaÕs agrarian economy is that, despite underwriting a world civilization, the transition to an industrial economy has eluded it. Using a model of AfroAsiatic tributarism, we attribute this outcome to endemic extractive contests between a predominantly landed peasantry and a titled, prebendary overlord class. The latterÕs strategy of political accumulation inevitably engendered immiserization of overlord and peasant alike by privileging diversion over production. The surplus was then dissipated on unproductive consumption, national defence, and internecine strife. Lacking a strong state to mitigate predation and political instability, the Ethiopian peasant rationally ÔchoseÕ to be efficiently, albeit self-sufficiently, poor.
    Keywords: Ethiopia, feudalism, tributarism, overlordship, landlordship, gebbar system
    JEL: N57 O55 P52
    Date: 2004–10–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cwm:wpaper:6&r=afr
  8. By: Lulama Ndibongo Traub (Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University); Thomas S. Jayne (Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University)
    Abstract: This article determines the effect of market reform on the size of maize milling/retail margins in South Africa. Simulations indicate that the deregulation of maize meal prices has caused a 16 to 20% increase in the mean retail price of maize meal since 1997.
    Keywords: maize, marketing
    JEL: F14
    Date: 2004
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:idpwrk:83&r=afr
  9. By: David Mather (Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University); Cynthia Donovan; T. S. Jayne; Michael Weber; Edward Mazhangara; Linda Bailey; Kyeongwon Yoo; Takashi Yamano; Elliot Mghenyi
    Abstract: This paper summarizes and synthesizes across the results of a set of country studies on the effects of prime-age adult mortality on rural households in Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, and Zambia. Each study is based on large representative rural household surveys. These findings have implications for the design of efforts to mitigate some of the most important effects of rural adult mortality, and for key development policies and priorities.
    Keywords: HIV/AIDS, sub-Saharan Africa, mortality
    JEL: I11
    Date: 2004
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:idpwrk:082&r=afr
  10. By: Duncan Boughton; John M. Staatz; Michael T. Weber
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0011&r=afr
  11. By: T.S. Jayne; Lawrence Rubey; Munhamo Chisvo; Michael T. Weber
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0018&r=afr
  12. By: David L. Tschirley; Michael T. Weber
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0019&r=afr
  13. By: T.S. Jayne; Mulinge Mukumbu; John Duncan; John Staatz; Julie Howard; Mattias Lundberg; Kim Aldridge; Bethel Nakaponda; Jake Ferris; Francis Keita; Abdel Kader Sanankoua
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:002&r=afr
  14. By: James F. Oehmke; Eric W. Crawford
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0020&r=afr
  15. By: Gem Argwings-Kodhek; T.S. Jayne
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0021&r=afr
  16. By: Thomas Reardon; Valerie Kelly; Eric Crawford; Thomas Jayne; Kimseyinga Savadogo; Daniel Clay
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0022&r=afr
  17. By: Valentina Mazzucato; Samba Ly
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0024&r=afr
  18. By: Duncan Boughton; Bruno Henry de Frahan
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0025&r=afr
  19. By: Julie A. Howard; Catherine Mungoma
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0026&r=afr
  20. By: Rita Laker-Ojok
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:0027&r=afr
  21. By: Thomas Reardon; Eric Crawford; Valerie Kelly; Bocar Diagana
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:003&r=afr
  22. By: Valerie Kelly; Jane Hopkins; Thomas Reardon; Eric Crawford
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:004&r=afr
  23. By: T.S. Jayne; Lawrence Rubey; David Tschirley; Mulinge Mukumbu; Munhamo Chisvo; Ana Paula Santos; Michael T. Weber; Patrick Diskin
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:005&r=afr
  24. By: Duncan Boughton; Eric Crawford; Julie Howard; James Oehmke; James Shaffer; John Staatz
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:008&r=afr
  25. By: Bocar Diagana; Valerie Kelly
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msu:polbrf:009&r=afr
  26. By: Yochanan Shachmurove (The City College of The City University of New York and the University of Pennsylvania); Uriel Spiegel (Department of Economics, Bar Ilan University)
    Abstract: Classical theory of international trade has long advocated trade liberalization and open borders. However, this process is not necessarily beneficial to all countries involved. This paper focuses on two modeled economies that initially share the same technology and per-capita income, but differ in population size. With trade, the profit of the large duopolist is reduced to the benefit of the duopoly in the smaller country, as the large country is no longer able to benefit from its larger population. This may explain why one country would want to open trade with high barriers while another country would prefer low barriers.
    Keywords: Duopoly, Free Trade, Protectionism, Population Size, Nash Equilibrium
    JEL: D4 F1 L1
    Date: 2004–07–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pen:papers:04-035&r=afr

This nep-afr issue is ©2005 by Suzanne McCoskey. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.