<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://lists.repec.org/mailman/listinfo/nep-hpe">
<title>History and Philosophy of Economics</title>
<link>http://lists.repec.org/mailman/listinfo/nep-hpe</link>
<description>History and Philosophy of Economics</description>
<dc:date>2012-02-08</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Erik Thomson</dc:creator>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lam:wpaper:12-05&#x26;r=hpe" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:sdueko:2011_010&#x26;r=hpe" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pur:prukra:1267&#x26;r=hpe" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6277&#x26;r=hpe" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lam:wpaper:12-05&#x26;r=hpe">
<title>Un aper&#xE7;u historique de l&#x2019;&#xE9;conomie exp&#xE9;rimentale : des origines aux &#xE9;volutions r&#xE9;centes</title>
<link>http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lam:wpaper:12-05&#x26;r=hpe</link>
<description>L&#x2019;&#xE9;conomie a longtemps &#xE9;t&#xE9; consid&#xE9;r&#xE9;e comme une science non exp&#xE9;rimentale. En quelques d&#xE9;cennies seulement, le paysage de la recherche &#xE9;conomique s&#x2019;est radicalement transform&#xE9; : la m&#xE9;thode exp&#xE9;rimentale occupe d&#xE9;sormais une place reconnue dans la bo&#xEE;te &#xE0; outils de l&#x2019;&#xE9;conomiste. Une histoire compl&#xE8;te et coh&#xE9;rente de l&#x2019;&#xE9;conomie exp&#xE9;rimentale reste &#xE0; &#xE9;crire. L&#x2019;article vise simplement &#xE0; en donner un aper&#xE7;u qui respecte la chronologie, mentionne les moments forts de son &#xE9;volution et identifie les pionniers de la discipline en m&#xEA;me temps que les repr&#xE9;sentants des principaux programmes de recherche qui l&#x2019;innervent. Il propose de fragmenter artificiellement l&#x2019;histoire de l&#x2019;&#xE9;conomie exp&#xE9;rimentale en quatre grandes &#xE9;tapes aux fronti&#xE8;res peu pr&#xE9;cises qualifi&#xE9;es ainsi : (i) l&#x2019;&#xE9;mergence : de la fin de la Seconde Guerre Mondiale au tout d&#xE9;but des ann&#xE9;es 1960 (ii) un lent d&#xE9;marrage : les d&#xE9;cennies 1960 et 1970 (iii) le d&#xE9;collage : les ann&#xE9;es 1980 (iv) la maturit&#xE9; : depuis le milieu de la d&#xE9;cennie 1990.</description>
<dc:creator>Daniel Serra</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:sdueko:2011_010&#x26;r=hpe">
<title>The prenucleolus for games with communication structures</title>
<link>http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:sdueko:2011_010&#x26;r=hpe</link>
<description>t is well-known that the prenucleolus on the class of TU games is characterized by singlevaluedness, covariance under strategic equivalence, anonymity, and the reduced game property. We show that the prenucleolus on the class of TU games restricted to the connected coalitions with respect to communication structures may be characterized by the same axioms and a stronger version of independence of non-connected coalitions requiring that the solution does not depend on the worth of any non-connected coalition. Similarly as in the classical case, it turns out that each of the five axioms is logically independent of the remaining axioms and that an infinite universe of potential players is necessary. Moreover, a suitable definition and characterization of a prekernel for games with communication structures is presented.</description>
<dc:creator>Khmelnitskaya, Anna B., Sudh&#xF6;lter, Peter</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-10</dc:date>
<dc:subject>TU game; solution concept; communication and conference structure; nucleolus</dc:subject>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pur:prukra:1267&#x26;r=hpe">
<title>Learning, Teaching, and Turn Taking in the Repeated Assignment Game</title>
<link>http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pur:prukra:1267&#x26;r=hpe</link>
<description>History-dependent strategies are often used to support cooperation in repeated game models. Using the indefinitely repeated common-pool resource assignment game and a perfect stranger experimental design, this paper reports novel evidence that players who have successfully used an efficiency-enhancing turn-taking strategy will teach other players in subsequent supergames to adopt this strategy. We find that subjects engage in turn taking frequently in both the Low Conflict and the High Conflict treatments. Prior experience with turn taking significantly increases turn taking in both treatments. Moreover, successful turn taking often involves fast learning, and individuals with turn taking experience are more likely to be teachers than inexperienced individuals. The comparative statics results show that teaching in such an environment also responds to incentives, since teaching is empirically more frequent in the Low Conflict treatment with higher benefits and lower costs.</description>
<dc:creator>Timothy N. Cason, Sau-Him Paul Lau, Vai-Lam Mui</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12</dc:date>
<dc:subject>Learning, Teaching, Assignment Game, Laboratory Experiment, Repeated Games, Turn Taking, Common-Pool Resources</dc:subject>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6277&#x26;r=hpe">
<title>Peer Effects and Social Preferences in Voluntary Cooperation</title>
<link>http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6277&#x26;r=hpe</link>
<description>Substantial evidence suggests the behavioral relevance of social preferences and also the importance of social influence effects (&#x22;peer effects&#x22;). Yet, little is known about how peer effects and social preferences are related. In a three-person gift-exchange experiment we find causal evidence for peer effects in voluntary cooperation: agents&#x27; efforts are positively related despite the absence of material payoff interdependencies. We confront this result with major theories of social preferences which predict that efforts are unrelated, or negatively related. Some theories allow for positively-related efforts but cannot explain most observations. Conformism, norm following and considerations of social esteem are candidate explanations.</description>
<dc:creator>Th&#xF6;ni, Christian, G&#xE4;chter, Simon</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-01</dc:date>
<dc:subject>social preferences, voluntary cooperation, peer effects, reflection problem, gift exchange, conformism, social norms, social esteem</dc:subject>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
